I don't know about other hobbyists, but I've always been turned off a little by very explicit reviews.  While I understand it helps one to know what's on the menu for a particular lady, once that is known, the only thing that is important to me are things like:

1) If she had an incall, was it nice?
2) Was she courteous and safe?
3) Was she misrepresented?
4) Did you have a good time?

All other things are subject to "YMMV".

DFK, BBBJ, even non-clock watching - those are all at the discretion of the lady.  I never expect those things to happen.  What happens between us is between us, and it's always different.  Of course, I would expect a lady to do different things with different people.  I've certainly been with ladies with whom I'd do different things, but not all with everyone.

I don't think there should be an expectation that a lady do certain things with everyone, so any reviews I do (on other boards) are generally answering the questions above, but are not specific.  Usually her website will tell you what is available.

What do you think?  ARe explicit reviews helpful, and do you enjoy reading them?

While I don't like particularly explicit reviews,(one of the main reasons I don't review" I do want to know if DFK and BBBJ are on the menu. I "do" expect those things to happen and if I know they are not on the menu I will usually choose to pass on the lady in quesion.

As far as expicit reviews go however, we are in agreement. I don't really want to know every single detail of what went on with a lady that I am about to see and every other guy she has ever been with.

I am Not the same with everyone...I am Not Robotic...and the only time I believe there should be an Expectation on me is when there is a lot of e-mailing and phone chatting going on that leads to a big build up and anticipation...otherwise everyone is different which means every experience is different as well...I personally do Not read my reviews...I just want You to be You and I will be me and let's just have a lot of Fun

A potential client recently wrote me and said "I just read all (over 100) of your reviews".

Uh - okay.

You just read about my (over 100) BBBJs, DFKs, DATYs etc. (a fraction of my activities)?

Reviews are vulgar and if I didn't have to allow them I wouldn't.

No offense to you, but this comes up at least once a month and it goes nowhere.  If you like long detailed ones read them.  If not skip them.  Pretty simple.  All I can say is everyone should just let everybody else do them as they feel as long as they are honest.  It is the reviewers review, not anyone elses.  And folks should not criticize those that go into detail because the TER instructions for the review says...

"This section should be used to describe the provider, the experience, and whether or not you enjoyed it in graphic emotional and sexual terms. Don't make this space a recap of the General section. Instead, go for a blow-by-blow tell-all of your session with the provider from your own unique point of view."

So again, house rules say do "blow-by-blow tell-all".  It may not be your favorite style, but folks that do that should not be criticized until you get the rules changed.  Which would be the suggestions board perhaps.

There is nobody that I want to know "that much" about. lol

If he books with you I hope you aren't "too" good, he has stalker written all over him.

I can review & still be discrete.  Not reviewing is not the answer.  Yes, it takes a little effort.

Every time is different, even with a Favorite Lady.  If I were to review each one, they'd also be different.  

NO, I don't care for overly explicit reviews, or pictures either!
skb

Under MOST circumstances, DFK/BBBJ/DATY are not YMMV items. If a hobbyist shows up fresh and clean, and her reviews/profile indicate they are available, then they should be.  
Extra time is an example of YMMV, the menu should not. Again, under most circumstances.

I do like to read the explicit details. You can gain some insight by reading them that you cannot get from her profile. A good example would be the flexibility of the provider, or different positions that are available, or will she move from the bed to a standing position, to a couch, a night table etc.
You can sometimes find out of she talks too much or wastes time too.  

I absolutely would want to know if DFK is on the menu.  If a woman says she is GFE and there is no DFK I would want to know that.

What is the point of a review if not to share the details?

due to the explicit nature required on some. Yes,there are the important(it seems there are four) questions that need to be answered. They have been addressed in above posts. Some boards offer a 'pull-down' option to answer those and other questions. If I have taken a fancy to a particular provider my desire for professional decorum becomes paramount. I WILL NOT share with others info. that has been afforded within the 'pull-down'. I will simply state as to a 'good time' or a 'great time'.

I have mentioned before the 'double edged sword' that I feel reviewing is. The guys(not all)want to know the menu and if it was delivered willingly and with the best of attitudes. I do not care to speak in(what I deam)irreverent tones concerning the ladies I choose to see. IMO that shows disrespect towards the ladies. Some men feel the juicier the review the greater the possibility of an incredible adventure. Not always the case.

Hanging my butt out there; one can usually tell(by my reviews)which ladies I will choose to see on a frequent basis. Thank goodness for sites that I can review with the respectful tone.Thanks for the question.

who commented about how they like reading my reviews because they look for the same type of encounters. They're not looking for 'alphabet soup', but more an indication of her reactions to certain techniques, conversations she enjoys having, etc. I understand that there are some guys who just want to see a confirmation of what is listed in the 'stats' section of the VIP info, and I have no problem with that.

Having been around for a while now, I know which reviewers are along the same lines as me when it comes to these encounters, and I have met some wonderful ladies through their recommendations. I have also had the opportunity to steer some gentlemen towards a few ladies that I know appreciate certain techniques that are more subtle in nature than an acronym lends itself to.

How many guys she has DFK,BBBJ,DATY,Rimmed,and a host of other acronyms!  I figure if you see a lady with 50 reviews, she has done the above with 100 to 200 guys!  Is it like people who find a huge lump on their neck, but don't go to the doctor because what they don't know won't hurt them???  I have not had the disappointment of a YMMV session yet.  I go to a provider VERY clean, groomed, the whole 9 yards.  

But I cant sit and worry about how many others she has done this with....save that for your SO!!!
Do you worry about how many mouths the dentist looks at? Or how many assholes you MD has fingered?  Sometimes I can't believe what I'm reading on this board!!!
I write reviews in detail, I read reviews with detail, and other than 1 TOFTT, I have never been disappointed!  It's part of the game!  Personally I hate the 1 paragraph reviews that tell little, and don't know how they even get posted!  It says "JUICY DETAILS"!!!

The thinking that "I pay to see a provider". "I do things with her I could never do with my SO"
"But I don't want to put in all in a review because it's impolite or degrading to a woman who sells sex for a living"!!!  Semms a little misplaced here,  Don'tcha Think?

Stan,

I agree.  There's nothing wrong with posting explicit reviews, especially when they are expected on the site.  The reader certainly has the choice to read them or skip them.

In addition, it's good information to know what's on the menu as well.  I guess my point was that consideration should be made that YMMV, and that these activities may not be available to all.

I didn't mean to criticize anyone who writes, or enjoys reading such reviews.

I don't think I said anything about being impolite or degrading in a review.  This was simply that YMMV within sessions going over, or in the alphabet.  I didn't make any mention of worrying about how many people she's done this with.

I'm not sure where those comments came from.

I always roll my eyes when I see providers (or guys) complaining about the level of detail in reviews. What the fuck do they think "blow-by-blow tell-all" means? Then they're shocked that the glowing, gentlemanly, non explicit reviews don't get approved.

Complain to management if you want the rules changed, live with it as is, or delist. Enough with the bitching at the guys who write the reviews the way the site dictates.

I promise you, if a woman has fifty reviews she has seen well over the couple of hundred men that you give her credit for. More than likely the number is in the thousands, not the hundreds.

and why the alias, is it possible that your actual reviews won't stand the test of public scrutiny? It's real easy to say that you do this, or you do that from behind the anonymity of an alias.

A certain amount of explicitness needs to be included otherwise the review will be rejected.