Has TER changed it's criteria for awarding a provider a "10" in performance.  Take a look at this one and share what you think;

A review so vague that you can't even tell whether the client actually penetrated the provider, much less got a BBBJ, anal or any of the other things that ostensibly rate a "10".  I don't think TER has changed its criteria; I think that they just fall asleep at the wheel from time to time.  I roll my eyes at perhaps 2 out of every 10 reviews because they are virtually useless in telling what the lady actually did ("everything was a blur" my ass!).

That's the only question.  Probably the latter. Why?
1) It's his only review.
2) There's nothing in the review that would lead one to think she deserved a 10.
3) She's in her 40s, which at least jibes with the fact her first review is 22 YEARS OLD!
The only way this review got approved is TER just didn't really screen it according to TER's own criteria.

The review is gone.

But doesn't it being his only review beg the question why TER did not pay more attention?  I know when I started my first two reviews took longer and were more closely examined by the approvers - but that was 10 years ago so . . . .

They nearly destroyed the place by pulling out of the US market after FOSTA/SESTA. So it makes sense they cut back on staff. Perhaps that explains it. At least the did something about it when an obvious fraud was exposed.