So I am about to see a well-reviewed provider for the first time today and I send the standard confirmatory text. Now I booked a nice long 3 hour incall but I get a return text suggesting that unless I'm in the mood for lunch, 2 hours should be "sufficient". Am I alone in thinking that it's kinda weird a provider would want less time? Or do providers prefer a shorter window for first meets in case the guy is sketchy? Thoughts?
then stay with the 3 hours. Otherwise, take the two hour appointment or find another provider. More then likely she will be rushing you out one way or another before the 3 hour mark.
Frankly, I would never book a provider that I have not seen for more then 1 hour. It's better to be disappointed for 1 hour then to be disappointed for 3.
She may have gotten a request from another hobbyist for time right after a two-hour with you, and she's trying to squeeze in both. If she can get you to pay for an hour of lunch, then it's not quite so bad turning down the other guy. If she can get you to agree to a two-hour, then she gets more money.
Or maybe she's not comfortable with three hours on a first date, although I find that to be a strange idea, given the stories that providers here have told.
It's not a matter of sketchy, when you get past 2 hours some providers want a meal in the mix someplace rather than just 3 (or more) hours of unrelieved work, even from repeat and well liked clients. Notice of more than a couple hours would have been nice, but I don't know what the conversation looked like, so maybe something made her realize you both had different expectations
She's telling you that her normal practice is exactly that, and if you aren't interested in socializing then you should plan on a 2 hour appointment. Be happy that she gave you the upfront notice rather than providing lackluster service or just assuming.
I've heard a lot of reasons why this is so over the years, but really it doesn't matter, what matters is she's told you up front what experience she's willing to provide, now you just have to decide from what's available, what experience you want and are willing to pay for.
When for some reason she did not think she could deal with three hours of sex. We don't know if she says in her pricing structure if the three hour package included some down time to eat and of course give her body a rest, mostly the rest. Geez fucking a dude for that long that is possibly not attractive really reduces the natural lube and some guys get all cattywumpas if a hooker reaches for lube during the deed.
I am still reeling at Tobis nightmarish client that fucked her raw and that was for 90 minutes, no hang on for 2 hours.
Yeah the hooker probably read that post and chopped off an hour of action to save her lady parts because she might have a booking the next day she doesn't want to cancel.
Whatever the reason she might have to rethink her packages and only offer what she knows within reason she can deal with, because EVERYBODY knows no trick wants to watch a hooker eat
In my experience, when a dude books three hours, it's because he wants a totally relaxed date. This usually means sharing some wine and conversation. I love me some 3hr dudes. They're always chill.
As for the OP, I can only think of three explanations for her wanting to change the 3hr to a 2hr: 1. Dude somehow gave her the indication (through something he said or possibly in his previous reviews, or whatever the case may be) that he expected to fuck her silly the whole time, so she decided to nip that shit in the bud. 2. She wants/needs to do something by a certain time on that date, and while a 2hr would leave her with sufficient time, a 3hr wouldn't. This could be anything from picking up her dry cleaning to seeing another client. 3. She somehow got the vibe that she wouldn't be able to stand the OP for an entire 3 hours.
My money is on option 2, but it's hard to say. I personally wouldn't read too much into it.
Posted By: hbyist+truth=;(
When for some reason she did not think she could deal with three hours of sex. We don't know if she says in her pricing structure if the three hour package included some down time to eat and of course give her body a rest, mostly the rest. Geez fucking a dude for that long that is possibly not attractive really reduces the natural lube and some guys get all cattywumpas if a hooker reaches for lube during the deed.
I am still reeling at Tobis nightmarish client that fucked her raw and that was for 90 minutes, no hang on for 2 hours.
Yeah the hooker probably read that post and chopped off an hour of action to save her lady parts because she might have a booking the next day she doesn't want to cancel.
Whatever the reason she might have to rethink her packages and only offer what she knows within reason she can deal with, because EVERYBODY knows no trick wants to watch a hooker eat!
this guy had already booked a 3 hour date. Sounds to me that this provider's website had that option of a 3 hour date. If the provider didn't want to have 3 hour dates, then why did she have that option on her website in the first place? Duh!!
If the provider only wanted 2 hour dates for first time visits, then that should have been clearly stated as such, not after the fact.
The Forest Waits
Posted By: Tobi Telford
In my experience, when a dude books three hours, it's because he wants a totally relaxed date. This usually means sharing some wine and conversation. I love me some 3hr dudes. They're always chill.
As for the OP, I can only think of three explanations for her wanting to change the 3hr to a 2hr: 1. Dude somehow gave her the indication (through something he said or possibly in his previous reviews, or whatever the case may be) that he expected to fuck her silly the whole time, so she decided to nip that shit in the bud. 2. She wants/needs to do something by a certain time on that date, and while a 2hr would leave her with sufficient time, a 3hr wouldn't. This could be anything from picking up her dry cleaning to seeing another client. 3. She somehow got the vibe that she wouldn't be able to stand the OP for an entire 3 hours.
My money is on option 2, but it's hard to say. I personally wouldn't read too much into it.
Posted By: hbyist+truth=;(
When for some reason she did not think she could deal with three hours of sex. We don't know if she says in her pricing structure if the three hour package included some down time to eat and of course give her body a rest, mostly the rest. Geez fucking a dude for that long that is possibly not attractive really reduces the natural lube and some guys get all cattywumpas if a hooker reaches for lube during the deed.
I am still reeling at Tobis nightmarish client that fucked her raw and that was for 90 minutes, no hang on for 2 hours.
Yeah the hooker probably read that post and chopped off an hour of action to save her lady parts because she might have a booking the next day she doesn't want to cancel.
Whatever the reason she might have to rethink her packages and only offer what she knows within reason she can deal with, because EVERYBODY knows no trick wants to watch a hooker eat!
Again, we did not see the conversation; therefore, it's impossible to know the pre-date arrangements that very well could have advanced as the date drew closer.
As we talk to guys, they become more comfortable expressing their desires for the date. In Tobi's case and mine, three hour dates are usually really chill. I've noticed the two hours are the hardest. Three hours tend to be more like a date than a three hour banging
but it does sound to me like the OP was looking for a "totally relaxed date" just like you said, but the way she phrased her words that two hours would be "sufficient" I think he would be in for anything but a "relaxed date" My suspicion is that he would be rushed out the door well before even his two hours were up, I have to go along with those who suggested he simply move on and find a different lady.
I have no problems with watching her eat...I simply won't pay her for that privilege.
And EVERYBODY? You've been here long enough to know that all encompassing is not the reality. There's a few somebody's out there that will pay a gal to eat. Some dudes even claim that it's the "gentlemanly" thing to do!
Posted By: hbyist+truth=;(
When for some reason she did not think she could deal with three hours of sex. We don't know if she says in her pricing structure if the three hour package included some down time to eat and of course give her body a rest, mostly the rest. Geez fucking a dude for that long that is possibly not attractive really reduces the natural lube and some guys get all cattywumpas if a hooker reaches for lube during the deed.
I am still reeling at Tobis nightmarish client that fucked her raw and that was for 90 minutes, no hang on for 2 hours.
Yeah the hooker probably read that post and chopped off an hour of action to save her lady parts because she might have a booking the next day she doesn't want to cancel.
Whatever the reason she might have to rethink her packages and only offer what she knows within reason she can deal with, because EVERYBODY knows no trick wants to watch a hooker eat!
She is probably thinking WTF am I going to do for 3 hrs with someone I don’t know? Apparently she thinks, she can’t fuck continuously for 3 hours so, don’t take any extended stay hard on drugs
There isn’t any conspiracy against you or anything weird about it.
I like at least 2 hour dates. I always bring, or have on hand a bottle of wine and a bowl of cut up fruit (supermarkets have already done the work for you). It has been appreciated EVERYTIME. Many times you are meeting after work, and between traffic and possible distance to the location, you don't have time for dinner. Having fruit on hand will typically guarantee an unrushed experience
Her session is a two hour experience. Buy it or don't as you like. You are overthinking it.
Honestly - if I were you - I would go for it. If she is a well reviewed provider, what's the worst that might happen? She probably has a really good performance that she does. If it's not quite all you want - try someone else next time. It's not like it's the last session you'll ever do.
I actually think it is decent of her to tell you how long the ride is and what the ticket costs without trying to extract more out of you than she wants to give you.
If you still want to see her. The word "sufficient" was a weird thing to say.
Posted By: Stvpatrick33
So I am about to see a well-reviewed provider for the first time today and I send the standard confirmatory text. Now I booked a nice long 3 hour incall but I get a return text suggesting that unless I'm in the mood for lunch, 2 hours should be "sufficient". Am I alone in thinking that it's kinda weird a provider would want less time? Or do providers prefer a shorter window for first meets in case the guy is sketchy? Thoughts?
What strikes me as odd and slightly unprofessional, is her are using the word " sufficient "… How on earth is this an unknown provider supposed to gauge what is sufficient for your needs? Maybe it's just me, something about this just strikes a nerve… You requested a specific service in a specific time frame and she has told you that she is unable to provide that. Personally if I were a client, I would be inquiring as to why or I would just move on to the next one… Seeing as how she advertises this should be available, right?
Posted By: AnotherDonJohn
If you still want to see her. The word "sufficient" was a weird thing to say.
Posted By: Stvpatrick33
So I am about to see a well-reviewed provider for the first time today and I send the standard confirmatory text. Now I booked a nice long 3 hour incall but I get a return text suggesting that unless I'm in the mood for lunch, 2 hours should be "sufficient". Am I alone in thinking that it's kinda weird a provider would want less time? Or do providers prefer a shorter window for first meets in case the guy is sketchy? Thoughts?
And you're right it should be available but I question this, I doubt we have been told about the entire exchange. He might have said a few things that she balked at and instead of just letting the guy go, she might have thought, "Oh well I can handle two but not three hours with this monger". We will never know.
I had a guy elude to me in an email that he wanted the entire time "in action", I refused the appointment because I physically cannot handle that and I had not seen the size of his winky. I could have reduced the time of the appointment but just preferred to not deal and let him find someone who could.
...I would move on. This wasn't a suggestion by her of a different time (1 pm instead of 2 pm) due to schedule conflict or Monday instead of Tuesday but a change in what you wanted to book. If I request 3 hours and she counters with 2 hrs and dinner I'm not interested. That wasn't what I wanted.
I did wonder though after reading your post if her web site or ad stated she did 3 hour dates or not. Is it possible you were requesting something she didn't offer ? Was there a rate given for 3 hour sessions?
If it's clear from her info that what you requested is available then yes it's weird that she countered and I would definitely just move along.
I believe that you are correct that the provider had a 3 hour option on her website, regardless of pricing, the guy picked the 3 hour option. Provider turns around and says that she can only do a 2 hour session. That doesn't sound very cool on her part.
Like you said, I'd move on. Not worth the hassle and there's plenty of fish in the sea.
The Forest Waits
Posted By: xyz23
...I would move on. This wasn't a suggestion by her of a different time (1 pm instead of 2 pm) due to schedule conflict or Monday instead of Tuesday but a change in what you wanted to book. If I request 3 hours and she counters with 2 hrs and dinner I'm not interested. That wasn't what I wanted.
I did wonder though after reading your post if her web site or ad stated she did 3 hour dates or not. Is it possible you were requesting something she didn't offer ? Was there a rate given for 3 hour sessions?
If it's clear from her info that what you requested is available then yes it's weird that she countered and I would definitely just move along.
Have a first time hobbyist for that length of session. If she is not right for him, he is out money and if he is a nightmare she then most likey will suffer through it to the best of her ability.
No way I would offer that length for a first timer.
Granted, I'm still new to this, but so far when we've reached the two hour mark, none have refused to go for three. Maybe it's because I'm an easy date.
So I am about to see a well-reviewed provider for the first time today and I send the standard confirmatory text. Now I booked a nice long 3 hour incall but I get a return text suggesting that unless I'm in the mood for lunch, 2 hours should be "sufficient". Am I alone in thinking that it's kinda weird a provider would want less time? Or do providers prefer a shorter window for first meets in case the guy is sketchy? Thoughts?
...You had already booked a 3 hour date sometime past. I missed that at first though your first sentence makes it clear. (wonder if others missed it too) She is recommending a change after everything has been set when you sent the confirmation communication for today's get together. That to me is more odd than what I thought which was in initial contact she recommended something different from what you requested.
I'm still recommend just moving on. But I'd be curious why the 3 hour date was ok when she agreed to it but not now. There needs to be some discussion between you two. Make a decision based on what comes out.
Since you said it was today you have probably done whatever by now. Hope you it turned out the way you wanted.
If you meet a new lady for a typical session. 2 hrs is about the max before you get board and it is time to go. Early in my hobby life I met a lady for 2hrs with the understanding if we were having fun to go longer, we went 3 hrs. (yes she was compensated for the extra time) But rarely will you want go longer in the bedroom.
Now on the other hand I do not understand why a lot of providers do not like extended dates. I mean time out of the bedroom, dinner, sightseeing, bar hoping, motorcycle rides, etc. If they really believe they are being compensated for their time, then whats the problem. On the other hand if they think they are being paid for sex then I can see where extended times 3-4 or more hours of straight sex maybe less desirable. So ladies make up you mind are you an escort or sex provider.
If they sell multi hour packages some are very good at making sure there is something other than screwing included. Not many ladies can handle 3 hours of fucking without a break.
Why some ladies don't offer more multi hours? Well they might have and had a client that did want to fuck for the entire time and it put them off so they changed their plans. And I doubt a hooker knows for sure what the guy has planned for her in the time since specifics are not discussed. Also some just don;t want to hang out that long with a monger. Depends.
Oh and to answer your last question.....some are just escorts in the very sense and some are just sex providers and some do both.
time- yor posting at 9:20am.....cud the simple most logical answer be, youve set the appt. for 10am...& noon is a regular standard time ppl eat lunch? If someone has had breakfast at 7 or 8am, tryin to force a quick snack at 9:30am just ins't going to be a solution... If ya would have set the apt. for 2pm for 3hours, possibly the answer might be different. I know this is our job & that's all ya see us as. But in reality we do need to eat, sleep, shower, etc.... I personally enjoy long appts. but meeting someone for the 1st time, Id rather save someone thier money rather than waste it trying to pretend like I'm having a great time when theres a personality conflict.
Posted By: Stvpatrick33
So I am about to see a well-reviewed provider for the first time today and I send the standard confirmatory text. Now I booked a nice long 3 hour incall but I get a return text suggesting that unless I'm in the mood for lunch, 2 hours should be "sufficient". Am I alone in thinking that it's kinda weird a provider would want less time? Or do providers prefer a shorter window for first meets in case the guy is sketchy? Thoughts?
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
VIP MEMBER
, you are now a VIP member!
We thank you for your purchase!
VIP MEMBER
, Thank you for becoming VIP member!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!
