TER General Board

It is implausible but theoretically possible..
Jacque_Jenesais See my TER Reviews 1621 reads
posted
1 / 13

SO. The difference in this situation is pretty black and white…

Men: Do you have any chance of having some 20-30 year old children you just-may-not-know about?
Women: Well, we don't have to worry, we get the blessing of ALWAYS knowing if the kid is ours…

What happens if a dude doesn't know he has an adult daughter out there of providing age… would you be upset if you found out they were a provider, even though you didn't know they existed as your child in the first place?

I don't know how you found out if you had a kid in the first place.. I'm too lazy to think of a clean way this mess happened...

-- Modified on 11/14/2013 6:28:26 PM

SinCitySinner 67 Reviews 303 reads
posted
2 / 13

And no chance of having had any kids that are of younger age since I've never had unprotected sex...

89Springer 345 reads
posted
3 / 13

Are you asking if I would be upset if I found out I had a child, and then found out she was a provider after I found out about having a child?

As for the original question, there's certainly a possibility I could have a kid I don't know about, but remote.

escalade1964 65 Reviews 280 reads
posted
4 / 13

I certainly do not worry about it.

Cannonhome1 334 reads
posted
5 / 13

I'm not talking about being a provider. But unknown children. Three years ago I got a call from someone claiming to be my brother. Turns out he really is!!! He was give up for adoption as a infant and searched for his birth family for 25 years. He found me through my new ancestry.com page. Now I have a terrific big brother!

It took me three days on the computer to track down his birth father. That was interesting. But now they have a warm relationship.

skyjockey46 293 reads
posted
6 / 13

Geez, tell one hooker you want her to call you Daddy and you're branded for life

ArthurDent 32 Reviews 257 reads
posted
7 / 13

i wouldn't be extremely surprised if there was an unknown love child out there.

But one that became a provider?  How would I know?

Of course, if someone told me that after a session (and could prove it), they'd likely be accompanying me on the ambulance after the resultant heart attack or stroke.

GhostWriteroftheDamned 353 reads
posted
8 / 13

WTF?

WAY better than being some kind of "Aroma Therapist" or multi-level marketing bullshit.

Patriarchal/religious precepts deemed it unseemly, and government has a very difficult time getting their "cut" from it; but if viewed objectively we're ALL WHORES in our chosen vocations.

TheHoundOfCullin 9 Reviews 229 reads
posted
10 / 13
Look2Me 15 Reviews 252 reads
posted
11 / 13

that I could have a daughter in that age range. I'd be more upset to find out she existed and I didn't know than to find out she was a provider. What's done is done and it's how you move forward that matters. If we had chosen to get to know one another well enough for me to know she is a provider.. then I assume there is a measure of trust and communication that is beyond the ordinary and I think I could talk about it with her without being upset. I'd rather be supportive of her, not focus on her job. I just don't think sex is in any way shameful.

GaGambler 258 reads
posted
12 / 13

I've been sexually active since I was 14 and I am 54 today, but realistically there are two women/girls I was with in my youth that I have wondered about a couple of times. Actually come to think of it, I could have sired a child in TJ back in 74 with a hooker that I had unprotected sex with, maybe his name was/is Udo? Keep in mind that this was in the pre AIDS era and bareback was the norm.

Following that train of thought, geez I could have a grand daughter of "providing age" and no, why would I be upset to find out she was a provider, many of my best friends are hookers. and who knows, maybe she could hook me up with her friends? lmao

Jacque_Jenesais See my TER Reviews 374 reads
posted
13 / 13

…and still recognized today…

I think there's a prostitute in the genealogy of Christ as well… can't remember, it's been a long time, lol.

But, if one is truly spiritual, yes, you're right… no one is without sin.. in fact, the one who is worse off is the one who looks down on another because his/her sin is 'supposedly worse' than theirs.  

(Pharisee with head held high during prayer vs. Sinner who begs for mercy with head low.) The humble heart is much more justified. From what I gather, the arrogant and self righteous is worse off.

Hell, I'd rather hang out with someone who is humble than perfect and prideful any day. How boring lol.

-- Modified on 11/14/2013 9:34:13 PM

Register Now!