...I know I sure as hell can't.

I think this may partially be one of those generational things.  Even among non-providers, I'd say more than half the women under 30 whom I know have some kind of ink on them someplace.  I'd rather see unmarked women entirely also--but if I restricted myself that way, I'd have a far smaller field to shoot at.

So:  My policy is that there are tattoos and there are tattoos.  Some of my very favorite ladies have some ink--a couple of them even look attractive, in a way.  (The tattoos, I mean--needless to say, the young ladies I see are all gorgeous.)

Sounds like the young lady you're describing would probably be too heavily inked for me to look beyond, just as you found--so I'd probably move on.  But don't rule out every provider for that one little butterfly on the behind or around the navel or something--you'll be missing out on too much.

I know this has probability has been discussed a thousand times, but can someone tell me what is so sexy about tattoos?  The other day I was looking at ads on BP (I know some of you don't like it but for where I am its the best option) and I saw a gorgeous woman. The first photos I saw she fully clothed and had every thing I wanted long hair,big breast, pleasantly plump, and a cute face. But as I scrolled down there were photos of her in lingerie. She had tattoos covering her breast,belly,ass,and legs. She just looked dirty to me (and I don't mean dirty little secret but haven't taken a shower in awhile). I think the female body is the most beautiful thing ever. Why would anyone want it marred ? Where would you but a tattoo on the Mona Lisa, Botticelli's Venus or for the ladies Michelangelo's David. Let me know what you think. P.S. I tried to add images but couldn't figure out how to do it

I'll say I don't like them and find them to be turn off, but, with the exception of the latest one, all of my favorite girls have had at least a few. I guess that makes me a hypocrite, lol.  These were all of the easily hidden variety though.

They don't do it for us, dumbass!

For all the fellas who dislike tattoos their are plenty who love them, so why post bs?  Skip the ads that, do have tattoos & pick a provider who has none.  I love all mine, and keep them on my photos to bypass the guys who do not care for body art.  Chemistry is everything!

Yes, most women on BP have tats, and not the good kind. But, many providers have none at all and some have them done very tastefully. Personally, I share the same views on them as you do, and prefer a woman without them, but I would not toss out a 10 because of a tattoo, either. Would you prefer a dog ugly fat chick with no tats, or a lean, fit, big breasted hottie with them? I mean, the obvious choice is the latter without, but I am making a point.

People do it because it is in vogue at the moment and regret it later.  

imagine what those artfull tats will look like when those individuals God willing to live long enough to be 75 or 80 plus....

Whatever.

are looking in the mirror when you post that

It's not a price thing it's a location thing. I find plenty of girls with no or one small tattoo. But IMO no woman with large tattoos can ever be a 10

I was signaling that I was opening a can of whoop-ass on him.
Just because one says one is new, it does not protect you from ire if you are stupid on this board.  
Everyone has his/her opinion and this is mine.

For other guys no one over a size 2 can be a 10, and again for others no one UNDER a size 6 is a 10. Funny how that happens.

You sounded less like a retarded robot.

So, either you like them or you don't, and some like lots of them and some like just a few, perhaps.

But to those of us who have loads of ink, it's about art and expression. Every time I look in the mirror, I get to see beautiful, colorful art and am reminded of what they symbolize for me. Each of my pieces express elements of my individuality and my life experiences. It really has nothing to do with sexiness.  

Pot, meet kettle.

it's like taking a peek into their private world where they secretly rebel.

Having trouble following the thread, huh?

Worthless to me. just go away

-- Modified on 1/19/2014 3:47:09 PM

Now grab that dunce cap from last time. Lol.

Now go back to the gym for one last set meathead

Btw, next time, you peek your little groundhog head up to debate,

You should see what AnotherDinJohn said about my barista friend, who he's never met. I really tried not to take offense at that.

I feel the female form is art. In fact Ibelieve it to be a masterpiece. If you look at the other works I mentioned I'm sure you would agree to put another design on them would be to marr them. I have been to your site and I think you are a very attractive woman and I am earnestly sorry if my use of the word offended you.

The last one had a butterfly above her butt, and it appeared to flap its wings as we did it doggie style. I enjoyed that.

Gonna have to take your side.  Call me what you want, but each time the needle goes in, so does the chance of Hep B/ Hep C.   Most places are clean, use fresh equipment, fresh ink, etc., but why take the chance?  But, if you are looking BP as a place to go mongering, take whatever chance you worry about with a lady with ink and multiply by 100 or more.  You'd be a hell of a lot better off with someone here covered with ink head to toe, than swapping fluids with a BP chick.  

Sure...

I'm in the over 50 bunch, so when I was a kid, it was unthought of for a girl / woman / actually anyone to have a tat.  I didn't run into the tat thing until I was in the service.  Tattoo parlors mostly existed in troop towns.  Once it became yet another fad, the followers all lined up to follow the fad, love it when the followers say they did it to express their individuality.  How long will the fad last, who knows.  Hopefully, those with high ambitions in the business world realize that certain rules exist that could preclude one from obtaining a desirable job because of prior bad decisions.  I don't think there is a law yet that says you can't discriminate against someone covered in ink.  And to answer the original question, tattoos would only be sexy in the eye of the beholder.

It's their bodies, they don't care what you think.

I'm also not a DaVinci painting, so the analogy doesn't really apply.  

I don't think I ever said people can't, or don't have a right to do, whatever they want with their bodies.

So if someone's username is tortilla1234, should I assume that they are a tortilla in real life? Get real. TER members have random usernames, doofus.

I also went to the site and didn't see the first tattoo????  Not crazy about airbrushed photos at all.   But that topic has been covered in other threads.

I don't want any tats on my OWN body, but I really don't think much about other people having them.
I could complain that all the providers on a given site aren't exactly what I'm looking for, but that wouldn't make much sense, would it?
Since beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and thine eye offend thee-- you're already screwed.