Let me know how you feel about this after reading the entire page because it relates to a TER member here & the way a provider has changed her screening policy.

The lady has every right to change her screening.
Client has every right to write a review.
Have seen more than one provider he has reviewed and probably could have written those reviews myself.
Have seen a lot of talk over many years about the 10/10 providers on this site soooo
Also looked at scores of other known names and numbers not out of line.
IDNK so can not besmirch either on the basis of her website change- but the lady is pissed.

... that I would never book a date with this Provider.  Displaying her negativity and baggage openly isn't attractive.  Neither is no MSOG especially at her price point.  

Ok, I saw her screening complaint in red(!) drama on her webpage, and as mentioned, she does seem pissed about the review. Then I saw and read that ter member's review and it was the lowest performance score on her page.

She looks amazing.....above my pay grade though.  I heard shes going to offer a $500 poor man's package where she meets you at an upscale wine bar for two glasses of wine.  The first one she drinks and the second one she throws in your face then walks off with your $500 and out without you.  If you're into fetishes, she'll throw the first one in your face, drink the second one then walk off with your $500 and out without you.  

I checked out her site and found his reviews. A few points:
1) Both have been around for a while and each has some creds as a result.
2) Clearly she had his review removed, so it's hard to tell why.
3) He's a tough but fair review scorer so maybe she didn't appreciate a score that was low by her standards. I say tough but fair because I've seen some of the women he's reviewed.
4) All that said, calling out his handle on her site is over the top. I've never seen anyone do this and I would not see anyone who did it. I would not be surprised if she's also Black Listed him.
Thanks for a good post.

she complained about, and being very familiar with the contents of reviews, I can see both sides of this.  Here is my analysis . . . .

Here's a link . . . .

His review of her is still up, and its not even a bad review.  He seemed to chalk it up to a chemistry thing.  And ur right about her naming him the more I think about it.  I think she shot herself in the foot with her diatribe.

1) he has been around for a long time / she has since first of the year and not received her 20 for the 100 list
2)still find his review - so do not know what you missed
3)do not know how tough in general he is but has graded a number of ladies who do not have the glammed up photos a 9 who are years older desires. On performance has graded massage upgrade  providers higher in most cases.
Do not know if she blacklisted him but rep here locally is such that it most likely would be meaningless.
As for the 9 in looks a poor performance will affect looks more then the reverse as well as maybe not meeting the visual expectations of her pictures.

Before the class jumps on me with the "1K isn't beer budget, dude", keep in mind with this young lady, 1k in the min and she's free to set whatever price she wants.Guys just have to learn to stay in their lane...so we all settled down now.
The guy went in with the Min 1k package because she reminds the guy that there's no MSOG. He didn't get the PSE deal, which probably gave her the ratings of 10/10's and yet he wants to compare his 1k deal to what the 10/10 crowd got?? He even said "I had the high expectations due to the (frankly crazy) consistent 10/10 ratings Carol has received, and I felt deceived by them."C'mon man.
Then he deliveries a backhanded compliment on her looks and psychical features, he did give her a 9 there...but check out the details in how he went at her. Her pictures and VIDEOS lay out what she looks like. By the way, she has more visuals then I can remember anyone having. If you don't her look based on that, then I don't know what to say.
Now she loved kissing, and she gave a good BBBJ and she let him CIM. Those, other then Greek are pretty good bells and whistles to get. And he gave her a 7....that I'm scratching my head on but....
I think the guys went in, thinking 10/10 but with the bleacher seat price he dissed out, he wanted behind the plate action.
But calling him out, I'm not a fan of, not cool...But if I had the jack, and she toured Vegas, I'd hit her up. I'd so the PSE deal.....of course.

But did anyone notice her pics show her face clearly but she smoked hid her face in the vids?  Smh?

I'd be interested in what exactly was his egregious action.
Other than a lower score and unenthusiastic description of the encounter, he didn't really have anything bad to say.

I know this Provider & had seen her a few times before under another name, she’s rebranded under her current persona & raised her rates. I know this because I realized I hadn’t seen her tweet or update P411 in a while, so emailed her & said I was looking fwd to her next tour in my city. She replied saying she’d love to see me, gave me her new dates, website/socials etc. Come to find out I’d been following her on Twitter for some time not knowing about the rebrand. Now knowing it’s her w/ increased prices I knew immediately I wouldn’t be booking again - more on that below.

she made it quite clear on her webpage that her decision to make screening more intense is punitive and not from any actual threat visited on her.  She told us, if "WE" don't like, we should go thank HIM."   She just didn't like the review, and now she is going to take it out on anyone who is a member of TER.  Like I said, this is passive-aggressive bullying and attempted intimidation of customers she hasn't even met yet.  Anyone that sees her is not going to get in without promising a 10/10 review, and then what good is their review to anyone except her?  She can go fuck herself, because I wouldn't, not even at half the price.  She is the new poster-girl for GPS.  

Now that she is a bit older  
Probably has more professional pictures.
Raised her rate significantly
Let me take a guess.  
Her looks scores were not all tens  
Her performance were not all nines unless she did anal for ten.
Quite possibly she might have had an occasional seven before .
Not beyond belief .
What were her scores?

-- Modified on 8/17/2023 6:38:24 PM

Her most recent profile was Charlotte Desir and she had scores that were consistently very high, including a lot of 10/10 because she’s hot, does anal and generally provides very good service. I do agree with the above comment about her being deliberately too chatty to keep the action to a minimum, which was also my experience and also why I would not see her again at her rates (which are maybe slightly higher but not by much from her prior profile).

I don’t recall exact numbers as her old persona has been removed from here. But she had high scores, 10s and 9s for looks and 10s, 9s & the occasional 8 for performance. There may have been a 7 peppered in there but don’t quote me on that and nothing lower for sure. When the fun starts she’s one of the best & with that body she was ATF material for sure, if not for the delay tactics & price tag.

And what was her prior name/handle? Might be time to expose her?
.
And I agree fully with cdl - her increased screening has nothing to do with her safety, it has everything to do with guaranteeing high scores. Perhaps Admin should take a closer look at this because that seems to violate TER’s policies.

I’ll post in the next day or two whether I think the provider in question is a true “10”.

Now it's 1k. So before, old rate you were cool to see her again, now...it's a no
I'm Just curious.

This is not a bad review, so I am unsure what the provider is upset about? I have read some of this gentleman's reviews and I have not found any that are mean or disrespectful. I think he was honest and gave constructive feedback. What exactly is she saying she needs to tighten her screening process for? Screening is for safety. There is no indication there was any physical/verbal altercations or issues with payment.  If she does not want reviews posted then she should say that on her website and also tell prospective clients. Calling out this gent in red on her site is a bit tacky.

Seems most were given White List Referrals for the 10's.  I wonder how many actually repeated?  If I gave a 10/10, I'd see her weekly.  

Good analysis

Many of these 'high-class' or 'high-cost' ladies get very upset when they get less than a 10/10 or 10/9 score. Why, you ask? Because their goal is to get into the TER Top 10 either worldwide or in their home base. They feel that drives their business up. So, if she gets a 9/7 it lowers her score and lowers her ranking. I've seen a few go nuts over this. Some object to the reviews and try to get the gent to increase the score or remove the review. Others delist and adopt a no review policy. IMO it's a bunch of BS, and I'm glad TER doesn't allow the reviews to be removed if the gent can simply show the arrangement of the date by text or email.

Where does she complain about the review? We don't know if her negative experience was in person or because of the review. Too vague. But, encouraging people to contact the client just means his story will be the only one told. Can't see that'll get her anywhere. If it's just a money and expectations thing, screening doesn't change that either.  

$700hr & at 5hrs she started tapering it in favor of the lengthier session.

a bad review.  It seems like he wasn't happy about the aftermarket modifications to her looks.  He knew her rate going in but from what she says in her website, maybe he complained about her rate due to her "alterations."

she has a TER profile under her former name.  Guys should have the benefit of reading her previous reviews.  If there are no ads in her old TER profile you can search the internet to see if her ads are still floating around in cyberspace.

It looks like this provider’s profile is no longer available on TER so it’s hard to gauge previous experiences. However I do know, that in my opinion, there are words/terms/phrases that you would not associate with high-class ladies.  
In this scenario I would point out the mention of MSOG in the pricing structure. Surely there must be a classier and more polite way of expressing this concept.  Add this business with calling the client out on her site and it’s just not what I would expect from someone with any sense of class whatsoever.  While she may be beautiful with great skills as a provider, I would suggest that she represents herself as high price, as opposed to high class.

It appears that her prior persona, Charlotte Desir, has been scrubbed from TER and Twitter/X. Perhaps the OP or a prior client can resurrect that data and merge it with her current profile through a Problem Report.

that her temper tantrum backfired on her. Her TER profile is removed along with her rant about the OP on her own website.  

Another re-brand coming.

Of course I can't mind read but it seams like he was a lot of work. Sometimes clients are, its the biz but usually they are appreciate especially when the guy has an issue finishing and then she makes it happen.  

She's using AI to change the color of her lingerie in some pictures but it's the same person.

It appears that the two new reviews are bogus.  Click on the reviewer's name and "No Such Page" Exists.  https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/karen-noir-380290/

She took down her p411 but here is a screenshot of it b4 she took it down

She’s gorgeous. Why all of the names and rebrands? From Elisabeth Skye to Charlotte Desir to Carol Ann to who knows who else … seems expensive, ironic and a waste of time, especially if she’s providing good service.

What’s the matter QB are you all caught with General Hospital and needed some nonsense to soothe the ennui

I'm all for someone wanting to make changes to their body and I've seen many boob jobs but damn...those are horrible!!

I agree. I don't think she's at all attractive.

I'd only stumbled on her ad page on tryst.link in recent months and didn't know she had prior identities or provider pages. I agree she's gorgeous and seemed to give consistent good service.  

Saying something about a TER client. What am I missing?

I posted this over two weeks ago & she has deleted it from her site. She was calling out a TER fella who wrote what she thought was a bad review because it was not her normal 10/10 rating. We all can be a 10/10 every time. It is what it is.

And I saw yesterday and today that she’s back on Twitter/X as Carol Ann acting like nothing happened. Hopefully gents won’t book her and she’ll learn a lesson.

Thanks for clarifying….I could tell she had deleted her TER account and hence I could not find the Review which irritated her.  Just from her attitude itself throughout her website, I would never book a date with her.  I am not  factoring in all the comments critical of her actions either.

I check in here sometimes. That's why I asked what did I miss?. Mkay?  

Not to justify this high price not high class provider, but getting into the top 100 list is big deal because some guys only use that to look for girls to see in a new city or their current city for new girls. They might not have time to go through all the ads or the reviews, just get the summary. So then 10/10 score is important. At least this is what one provider told me bc she would rather I not write a review that if it wasn't a 9 or higher.

One girl told me she rebranded because of a stalker. Another had to because she lost her password or maybe got hacked, I forget. She said she lost all her reviews because of that when TER blocked her account. Another one just felt like graduating to a different persona and rate structure instead of raising her rates. Not sure about this girl, sounds like the latter reason.

Have you seen Laura Luisa or Aurelie Griffith? They both have multiple reviews in consecutive months at 10/10 to get them into the top 100. Maybe they're really that great?

You're right Holly, no matter how "good" a lady is there will be someone who doesn't care for her looks and/or performance.

lol. Not that I know what a cow's anus looks like, but that is what her lips made me think of!