A more thought-provoking post than that which I usually find.
Yes, I would prefer a LTR to the periodic interludes with my ATF or the other providers with whom I've spent my time. That said, I've already been married once. For my divorce in 1975, I had to give my ex the house, the cars, alimony, child support and over half the cash value of my business. I say over half because to raise half the cash value of the business, I had to sell some heavy equipment and take the loss between what I paid for the equipment and the residual cash value for what I was paid for the equipment. "Half" (as it applies to domestic relations law)is a concept that more than scares me; it also pisses me off.
However, I made several decisions many years ago (consciously or unconsciously). Result: my life is pretty much consumed by work. One of the byproducts of these decisions is that I have neither the time nor the energy for someone who gets upset because I didn't remember "our four-month anniversary" or other such "important" holidays.
My ATF says she's in the business because she is high maintenance. That may be, on the other hand my relationship with her is rather low maintenance. All I need do is make sure her donation is in the proper amount and place. Yes, I do bring her flowers or candles or a little teddy bear when I visit. I take her to nice restaurants. I like to treat my ATF as I would like to be treated. In return, she is the drop-dead gorgeous woman on my arm for social functions (and the stares and jealousy of the others in my industry to me is priceless). From time-to-time, she keeps me warm through the night. After we finish rolling around, we usually cuddle and talk like old friends. While we are friendly and, perhaps, even romantic; I don't mistake her for a friend or our relationship as a romance.
I've had a number of mistresses and ATFs. I've taken most of them on vacations and always treated them well. Two common threads run through all these women. 1) They are all intelligent and well-read. 2) They are all visually stunning. I'm a realist and for lack of a better word, a businessman. I can understand an exchange of value for value. We just have to agree upon the amount of compensation for services rendered. I also understand that while I may be a little sharper than most of the knives in the drawer, I'm rather larger than most men and not as easy on the eyes as they are. I know my ATF's company is a result of a commercial transaction and not an affair of the heart.
Perhaps, I could have married a second wife, a woman who was as intelligent and as beautiful as some of the women noted above. I don't know. Perhaps, I'll never know. But, I do know there are a number of women who have had their educations partially financed, houses, cars, health insurance or other expenses partially paid by funds provided by me in exchange for their temporary company.
IMHO, my relationships with my ATF is a more honest transaction than that between me and my (now ex) wife. My wife allegedly married me for love. In the end, all she demanded was money; or I was going to jail (the judge's words). For the time we were married, I could have had the most expensive PSE for less than my ex-wife received in our divorce and have had a helluva lot less stress. This is why I have an ATF and will never have another wife.