A provider recently told me that many of her clients want only oral. She said something like "as I reach for a condom they stop me and say just keep on what you're doing.."

Now most of the time I need the penetration and release to get true relief but now I wonder what other's experiences are?

Most wives don't perform oral.
It is something that a man doesn't get
often enough. Most men can get bare back sex
from their wives. So why get it covered from a provider??
Men Love BLOW JOBS!!!!!!!

I'm not sure what the question is..
Is it:

a) What do your clients usually prefer?
b) What percentage of your clients prefer ONLY BJ's?
c) How many of you have clients who ONLY prefer BJ's?

In that case, B, or C would be non-applicable, as I haven't had ANY client express that they ONLY want oral. It's a variable menu and we both go with the flow..

Sometimes they are exhausted or stressed and want just the release with little work; prefer the 'after' chatting and cuddling..
I'm for whatever works..whatever makes him a happy guy.





-- Modified on 5/24/2003 7:34:53 PM

When hobbying, I will choose a BBJ over intercourse with a condom simply because I can no longer feel anything when wearing a condom.  This causes me to frequently lose an erection, resulting in great frustration.  Wasn't always the case, but middle-age takes it's toll, I guess.

When they start making vaginas  that can provide enough stimulation to be felt through the R-30, bullet proof latex condom*, I'll gladly go back to vaginal sex.  I certainly miss it tremendously due to the more intimate nature of the act.

I should mention that I do enjoy anal sex (with condoms) simply because of the greater pressure and sensation that it provides.  

* No need to offer well-intentioned recommendations on condom brands.  I've tried them all and thrown away dozens of boxes with the same result.  Also, the thin ones (.05 mm) are typically too small, so no luck there either.

...intercourse about 80% of the time, and a BJ to completion (covered or not) about 20%.  On those occasions when multiple pops are an option, I try for one of each!

Decisions, decisions; My head(big & little) could explode trying to make this choice. They're both SOOO good.
Research!; That's it. I'll selflessly volunteer myself for an extensive 10year, 10,000 provider comparison to find which is better.  

 Wish me luck.
   FR225

That's an interesting observation. How do you know that "most wives" don't give bjs? I don't think it would be easy to make an empirical observation of that. By definition, even the most married among us would only have a limited sample.

I would, however, conjecture  that most wives will not give a bj to completion, and that is the "provider advantage."

I've read many reviews of proividers spending 20-30 minutes OR MORE to get their hObbyist to come that way(how may hobbyists  fall in love with their provider for that selfless act, esp when their provided might be  sucking through latex for so long--after all how many men enjoy cunnulingus through a dental dam?).

I doubt most wives would be willing to be so longsuffering with their "hUbby"ist.

Any thickness of latex really inhibits my sensitivity.  I always bring my own now, the thinner type, which is a little better.  But I'll always start with BBBJ.  If my partner is good, and they usually are (Thank You TER!), then I generally continue to the end.  It all depends on my "involvement" with the provider.  If a second pop is in the cards, then CFS comes into play.

A guy I know was once asked to describe the worst BJ he ever experienced.  His answer:  "Fantastic".

You didn't actually specify, but I'm assuming that the question relates to covered intercourse vs BBBJ?  All this certainly depends on the gal, but if the BJ was covered I'd definitely say intercourse.  Otherwise it's maybe a 49-51 choice for BBBJ in most cases.  But I'm glad I don't have to choose either/or.

Not to be gross, but one reason I have opted to keep the bbbj going has been when I notice a lack of freshness on the provider's part.  

Nothing wrong with a good bbbjtc.  In fact, I would go so far as to say that if the bbbj is going really well then I will take to completion.  But, if it becomes uncomfortable (teeth many times get in the way) then time for the jimmy.

As far as cbj, I think that while it is almost a waste of time for the immediate pleasure it seems to make sex much better.  I think it warms up the condom, or possibly just gets it to seat properly.  When I don't get a cbj before sex I feel like I'm wearing a tennis shoe on my johnson.

For whatever reason, I like some form of bj before sex.

I know that most wives don't give head
because I am a provider who's clients
continually explain how their wives
used to when they first got together
but she didn't do it to completion
if she would even do it at all and
as a provider who absolutely loves to
give oral pleassure I find it mutually
rewarding for me and my partner. It is
usually a "treat" for a man to recieve
a BBJTCIM Besides a second cup should
always be available if the woman is any kind of provider

and I'll show you a man who cheats on his wife.

I am proof of that!!!!

I'm new to this, but what is the risk, percentage-wise, of getting a BBBJ? Most people on here seem to think that BBFS is so much more dangerous than BBBJ, but how safe is BBBJ? What can you get from BBBJ? Does anyone know? Same question for HJ.

Thanks in advance.