........when it comes to a tramp stamp. It seems that most men aren't fans. But they drive me f**ing insane, in a good way.

It also happens to be my favorite part of a woman.

The lower back with a gentle curve that dips in with those adorable matching dimples just above an extremely sexy, tight ass.

Add a tasteful tramp stamp to the mix and I am in heaven.

Thanks for listening.

but if all things are equal, I don't really like tats, and the fewer the better IMO. A few really don't bother me, but biker looking chicks, with ink all over their body, just don't do it for me.

It has to fit the look of the woman. the single tramp stamp is clich but ok. A tribal arm band is boring to me. A few small random tats  may look dumb, if not done right imo... but I'd still book.

Face and neck piece make me cringe! ...would not book. Foot and hand pieces are out too.

Well done, large, colorful piece can be sexy and a turn on ( think 'suicide girls' ) and make increase the desire to book.



HalfHour

a lady who has obvious tattoos, or a tramp stamp? Do you think they are sexy, or are they a turn-off?

Younger women these days are much more likely to have tattoos, body piercings ... and mostly likely shaved/waxed ...

1) no tattoos are always OK
2) small discreet tattoos are always OK
3) obvious but very artistically executed tattoos are OK

whether they are sexy beyond OK depends on the lady more than the art or lack of it.

i have never seen a tramp stamp that falls into the above categories. now that i thikn of it, i have been out to dinner with ladies in all 3 categories above but never with a person wearing a tramp stamp.

hmmmm......

Tat's are cool!
Doesn't seem to make a lady,more or less attractive.If they are beautiful,well, their still beautiful with tat's! IMHO

A few's cool. But the whole sleeve deal, or all up and down their leg I can definitely do without.

Now that I think about it, out of the ladies I've seen only one didn't have any tats. That could very well be different now seeing as how I haven't seen her nekkid in something like 8 months.

Oh well. Guess it's just one of those things you have to look forward to when you see some of these ladies.

I've been shown the error of my ways by a hottie with a few.

While I have always liked body piercings I used to detest tats.  But then I met Samantha in DC/MD whose body is a work of art and I love to just gaze at her lovely 'wings'.

However if she is a Playboy centerfold there is no way I want to see any part of that lovely body covered up.  For those type of women it seems just wrong to cover what it already so sexy and feminine.

I once knew a lady that had body art that most would consider extreme.  Knowing that lady's personality, it suited her perfectly, and was a definite turn-on, part of the reason I enjoyed seeing her.   I also know a civvie that has lots of body art...I would see boink her tomorrow, if she weren't married to someone I know.  

That being said, I have no problem with tats if they are complimentary, and not distracting.   Tats on the face, neck, hands, and /or tits would be a turn-off automatically.  The Tramp Stamp, I have no problem with so long as it's not ugly or over the top.  A small one on her butt (rose or heart), wouldn't bother me, and a tat on her ankle I would ignore.   Arm tats...I am not swift on.      

Overall, potentially a turn-on or turn-off.  Depends on the lady, and the factors I described.  All things considered, best to have none, and remove this from the equation.

On that note if I see another  set of angel wings or barbed wire around a bicep I'm gonna call it the way I see it.  Bullshit.  I don't want to see you.  Now if your tats have a story i might be interested.
Doc

It really depends on the person wearing it.  

Personally, I would choose someone with no art.  I never understood why some very beautiful women want to look like a fourth graders doodle pad, but that's just my opinion.

....just as implants are.  Being an AARP member, I grew up when females had neither.

If I want tattoos, I'll look for a Popeye comic.

If I want something round and artificial, I'll blow up a balloon.

My slogan:  "Nothing man-made on a woman"

How do women think they will look collecting
Social Security sporting implants and tattoos?

Oh man! That is exactly what I was thinking about. How would I look with those tats when I get old? They are probably each very nice, very artistic, and an expression of her personality (or, possibly, the guy(s) who owned her if she was a biker chick). If I have to look like that when I get older, no way am I getting a tattoo anywhere on my body.

Although I respect a persons right to do whatever they wish with their body and that includes tattoos, I do prefer ladies without them.  IMHO, a woman's body is a work of art "as is".  Of course, we all have our own particular tastes when it comes to different forms of art work ...LOL.

Anyhoo, I would consider a few tattoos or a tramp stamp which are tastefully done to be okay and they won't prevent me from seeing a particular lady.  The only kind of tats that are definite turnoffs are those with names of boyfriends or whatever.

Minus the implants...about as horrific as saggy men with tats will look.

Ink definitely represents a specific attitude, and if done properly, the more the better!