TER General Board

Incentive
dma2637 1 Reviews 3945 reads
posted
1 / 37

Hi. With the pandemic, what precautions are hobbyists taking during a visit with a provider?  What activities are you refraining from?

Thank you.  

-- Modified on 9/10/2020 8:25:14 PM

-- Modified on 9/10/2020 8:25:10 PM

36363jensen 4 Reviews 190 reads
posted
2 / 37

other than seeing someone you have some clue about -- like her honestly telling you how she is, and expecting the same from you -- there really is not such thing a precautions. Other than holding your breath the whole time or taking some scubba gear you WILL be breathing the same air. If so if either of you are contagious it is near certain the other will become infected.

Twoontuesday 11 Reviews 218 reads
posted
3 / 37

Submitted for your consideration and approval...

 
There are three possible fucked up outcomes: LE sting, ROB or shitty session.

 

If your monger sense is blowing up, not a good sign.

 

That being said, you can drive around the block before your session and see if there's a bunch of LE cars parked...

 

 
You won't know if you're gonna get robbed until the magic door closes and you're already inside...always good to know some martial arts...

 

 
If you bring your A-game, you can turn sour lemons into lemonade; but there's no guarantees.

 

Roll the dice my monger brother and hope for a YO Eleven!!!!

 

 

YMMV

TheGovernor 142 Reviews 159 reads
posted
5 / 37

For the most part I have been sticking with my regulars....Limiting my encounters once a week....Same with the lovely ladies I spend time with....Never strayed from my schedule since the beginning of February.

inicky46 61 Reviews 156 reads
posted
7 / 37
1192967 45 Reviews 144 reads
posted
8 / 37
Jacque_Jenesais See my TER Reviews 210 reads
posted
9 / 37

for COVID testing.

Obviously the results are "false positives" or "false negatives" and the results come back much quicker than the real ones.

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 162 reads
posted
10 / 37

holding their breath for more than 2-3 minutes, but luckily, that's long enough for a lot of guys to finish, according to what many providers have told me.  

 
If I'm going to get Covid from a session, fuck the air, I want to get it from DFK or contact by my tongue with  her pussy.  Go big or go home.

useyrhead 4 Reviews 208 reads
posted
11 / 37

So far, though, I’ve not succeeded in talking any providers into outdoor sessions.  ;)

Dynomite 172 reads
posted
12 / 37

I went to see a provider last week who took my temperature and then took her own to show she wasn't sick.  Not fool proof, but at least it's something.

GaGambler 225 reads
posted
13 / 37

People can also spread the disease BEFORE they show any symptoms. So it might be "something" but it's not much.  

 
I hate to piss on your parade, but this is my issue with masks as well. People think they are doing "something" but the science really says otherwise.

 
Don't get me wrong, I am not saying you should hide in your basement, unless of course you are in one of the very high risk groups in which case that really is not bad advice. I am just saying don't get lulled into a false sense of security unless of course you have the immune system of a cockroach like I do. lol Most providers, (that I see at least) are young and healthy and don't have as much reason to be scared of COVID than people older, fatter and in poorer health overall.

Kitty76 See my TER Reviews 192 reads
posted
14 / 37

HELLO HOBBYISTS,  
  First of all, Everyone here on this site should have thought about the whole covid--19 when it started.  There's no need to worry about it now that we are this far into it.  So, stop worrying.

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 162 reads
posted
15 / 37

where were you at the beginning?  Did you buy into the hysteria like most of your sisters?  Lol   Its funny how, as the real facts come out, its not the boogie man we all thought it was.  

goCubz20 8 Reviews 194 reads
posted
16 / 37

Not as a precaution, but just for "fun", I thought about asking a provider to wear a sexy mask... like a belly dancer mask, or wedding veil sexy type of thing. I posted this idea on another TER board but thought to throw it in here too.  

Someone mentioned a masquerade mask would be cool too.  It may be fun and break the ice during a session, to get over all this pandemic and talk of masks!!

Cheers!

impposter 49 Reviews 159 reads
posted
17 / 37

Venetian Masks are a whole "thing."  
http://duckduckgo.com/?q=venetian++mask&iax=images&ia=images
.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnival_of_Venice#Carnival_masks

Posted By: goCubz20
Re: sexy masks
Not as a precaution, but just for "fun", I thought about asking a provider to wear a sexy mask... like a belly dancer mask, or wedding veil sexy type of thing. I posted this idea on another TER board but thought to throw it in here too.    
   
 Someone mentioned a masquerade mask would be cool too.  It may be fun and break the ice during a session, to get over all this pandemic and talk of masks!!  
   
 Cheers!

eastside70 47 Reviews 189 reads
posted
18 / 37

My 1000 employee company has been performing temperature checks every day since late April. We've had 18 positive cases to date which NONE were discovered by temperature checks, but by positive test results. Negative test results are required in order to come back to work after vacations.  

The majority of our positive cases have occurred over the past month or so when people were coming back from vacations and kids going back to school.

WICardinalfan 160 reads
posted
19 / 37

Eyes Wide Shut.  

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 143 reads
posted
20 / 37

a few months ago, and things started heating up.  First a little DFK, then I put my hand up her skirt and got her good and wet while she unzipped my fly, pulled out my sausage and started blowing me, and the next thing we knew, we were butt-naked having sex on the Spanish pavers beneath us.   It was great, and I would love to repeat, but unfortunately, we were told that we were not welcome at that restaurant anymore.

useyrhead 4 Reviews 185 reads
posted
21 / 37

Ha! Very funny.

 
A blanket on the soft ground in a somewhat isolated spot on a not too hot day is more up my alley. But this is still a hot thought.

impposter 49 Reviews 180 reads
posted
22 / 37

What did the Spanish pavers have to say about it?

Posted By: coeur-de-lion
Re: I was out on a patio with a provider . . . .  
a few months ago, and things started heating up.  First a little DFK, then I put my hand up her skirt and got her good and wet while she unzipped my fly, pulled out my sausage and started blowing me, and the next thing we knew, we were butt-naked having sex on the Spanish pavers beneath us.   It was great, and I would love to repeat, but unfortunately, we were told that we were not welcome at that restaurant anymore.
Maybe this? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zOvyRjVQLjE

lester_prairie 12 Reviews 110 reads
posted
23 / 37
lester_prairie 12 Reviews 91 reads
posted
24 / 37

People who die with (not from) CV19 are counted as dying from CV19.  No flu or virus in past history has been categorized like this.  It is not possible to compare death rates with CV19 with any other virus in history.  

36363jensen 4 Reviews 114 reads
posted
25 / 37

Strictly speaking I suspect we have. In fact the flu virus itself really doesn't kill anyone. It is nearly always due to some related factor, such as over taxing the immune system, weak components of the body that fail due to the increased stress and the like.

Oldtimemonger 98 reads
posted
26 / 37

Ever hear of AIDS?  Nobody actually dies from AIDS! Death comes from the opportunistic infections not AIDS itself. Me thinks you are not the sharpest knife in the drawer.

GaGambler 99 reads
posted
27 / 37

You know I really don't like agreeing with you, but you NAILED this one. lol

 
That said, what we should all be agreeing about is the fact that the statistics are all but meaningless where COVID is concerned. No one seems to be differentiating between the death of someone who is 94 years old with advanced lung cancer who dies of said lung cancer but has tested positive for COVID with an otherwise healthy 25 year old who contracts COVID and then dies from some upper respiratory issue a couple of weeks later. Both go down as COVID deaths, but they are two VERY different statistical groups.

lester_prairie 12 Reviews 98 reads
posted
28 / 37

The question was how were earlier flu deaths were categorized versus how we are comparing CV19 deaths.  Every death WITH CV19 is now called a CV19 death -- that's official policy according to Dr. Brix.  

Oldtimemonger 119 reads
posted
29 / 37

Yes , but:..... What about the 30 year old diabetic who gets covid? Diabetes usually takes about 8 years off your life expectancy . The average life expectancy of our 30 year old is 78 minus 8 for diabetes. He should make it to 70.

If he dies at 30 from covid, he has lost 40 years of life he should have had. Even the 94 year old might have lived to 101. Nobody (including medical doctors ) can predict for sure how long a person will live.

There is also the 10-15% possibility of lung / heart damage even if you don't die of covid. We don't know if the damage is permanent. I suspect the 60 year old is more likely to be permanently damaged than the 25 year old.

The problem with the stats is not the stats by themselves. It's the interpretation of the statistics that is the problem. After all, we could say had it not been for diabetes our 30 year old would still be alive so don't blame it on covid.

Even if the average person who died with covid had only lost 5 years of life, do the math on how much human life is down the drain.

You are welcome to interpret the stats any way you want but it won't change the seriousness of the disease.

36363jensen 4 Reviews 117 reads
posted
30 / 37

I don't doubt you can find some examples but for the most part I think everyone on the "it's not just the flu" side agrees that risk of death is largely for those with existing health issues, be those issues age related or some other cofactors.  

 
But what most have been arguing against is the "it's the same as the flu" so nothing to worry about if you're not old or frail. We now are getting a much better picture, and we had good indications even back in March and April. Multiple organs are impacted and damaged, it causes some serious blood related changes, thickening the blood, damaging capillaries and generally producing flow problems that stress the body. We know it is causing strokes and blood clots. We know it causes some nerve damage and apparently some lasting lung damage.

 
Given the concerns some have about the aging population and the demands on healthcare costs, results in shifting resources into that line of production and away from other production when the size of the workforce is declining relative to aggregate demand (think the whole social security/medicare problem + private sector), the indications that COVID-19 survivors may well be adding to that problem is not trivial.  

 
With regard to the cause of death classification I don't think that bar has been moved nearly as much an some want to claim. I agree there will always be something of a judgement call on that but what some want to claim here amounts to pure conspiracy theory.

-- Modified on 9/19/2020 12:38:22 PM

36363jensen 4 Reviews 91 reads
posted
31 / 37

That is simply not true.

 
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvss/vsrg/vsrg03-508.pdf

 
The only real difference here is that given the virus and disease is so new they are trying to provide some guidance. At best what the guidance is saying is that "if you are not sure what to list as the underlying cause of death then COVID-19 is probably a good choice." It is NOT saying if the person was infected no matter what the actual cause of death was say COVID-19.

 
You can also go read some of the other Vital Statistic Reporting Statistics reporting guidance documents as well and you'll see they are all saying the same thing: be sure about the actual underlying cause of death, not the proximate cause.

GaGambler 164 reads
posted
32 / 37

I am perfectly willing to concede "it's not just the flu" but that doesn't discount my point that the hysteria caused by using overblown numbers is causing more damage than the disease itself. Nor does it invalidate my point that NOBODY seems to be able to agree on what the "real" numbers are. Even the CDC admits their estimate of the total number of infected people could be off by a factor of TEN. When you can't even get your stats accurate to within a full decimal point, any conclusions you come to using such data are so inherently flawed as to be statistically worthless, except of course to score political points.

lester_prairie 12 Reviews 109 reads
posted
33 / 37

HHS reported 63 California hospitals received $50,000 for each eligible coronavirus patient they admitted between Jan. 1 and June 10, 2020.

Oldtimemonger 93 reads
posted
34 / 37

Your state of Minnesota was getting 300k per Corona patient. California was one of the states ripped off. Elective surgeries would have brought in a hell of a lot more than the covid patients . 50k did not even cover ICU costs.

Oldtimemonger 111 reads
posted
36 / 37

It is usually based on the insurance companies formula. Obviously a cut on a finger that needs 5 stitches  pays less than a coronary bypass.

Regardless, ER services were down 70% ( lots of people visit ER for minor things but it pays the hospital well ) because of fear of covid.

Elective surgery is the other big profit center and that went to 0% last spring. Many hospitals were half empty because they had to prepare for the worst case covid scenario.

I don't have access to all the financials but the link below should give you some idea.

36363jensen 4 Reviews 94 reads
posted
37 / 37

Admittance not the same a death just for a starter. You can shift your ground all you want but all you're doing is proving that you don't care about the claims you make or fact but only about pushing your agenda -- whatever that might be now.

Register Now!