Are most escorts attracted to the same sex, or are they attracted to the opposite sex, or are most providers truly bisexual?

Most providers are attracted to money.  The veteran professionals don't seem to care whether it's in a pocket or a purse before it comes to them.   Exclusion of same-gender customers seems to me to be more often in Newbie and very young providers. Just my own observation.

... that it's unlikely that MOST escorts are bi-sexual... based on TER numbers at least.  

Straight up honesty.   Not speaking  for all but some if not many  can "turn on the switch " when they got a fish  on line  that wants that duo experience . For double  rate of course.  

.... who opted out of a session with me were either under 23yo and/or a newb. There are exceptions,  of course. Some providers are lesbian and told me that they don't want to mix business with too much pleasure

-- Modified on 1/1/2018 1:17:13 PM

..... if they can fall in love with women?
Two different issues.

Is it safe to assume that you're attracted more to men? Do you see women? Are you a bottom or top or both? What is your preference? Im a straight male.  I know some women that are truly bisexual and have periods of only wanting women...providers and civvies. However, they always come back for the D. I feel that there is a smaller percentage of truly bi women. I cant put a number or percentage on it...noone can. But i have learned that the majority of providers I know arent truly bi...they do it for the money. In your real life, how many ppl do u know that are truly bi?

You bring up good points AND show exactly why some of the TER profile questions should be answered by the provider, or at least have the provider's input.  

That "really bi" in the profile is most often put up by men after a doubles session.  I would be surprised if Lesbian hobbyists would bother putting that in the profile because they would NOT consider their session a "bi-sexual" experience, so there may be thousands more that see both men and women but their profile doesn't indicate same.  If I'm wrong on this I will defer to Lopaw.  

but I've found that most providers enjoy being with women, myself included

What I've observed over the years is that nearly all provider profiles are created as singletons before those providers are mentioned in doubles reviews.  Thus the "really bi" gets into profiles when they're originally created (or when updated through a problem report), not when the provider is mentioned in a doubles review.  Just because a doubles review gets published doesn't mean the two providers' individual reviews will be updated with "really bi", if they didn't already say that.  

GIGO,  The figures based on profiles are meaningless. Most "hobbyists" would know if a girl was really bi if she had it tattooed on her ass. Of all the unreliable stats you could pull from the reviews here, it is the single most unreliable.

1) Ask.  Or just listen.  
2) Observation/experience.

... or how many are gay for pay, especially based on TER profiles. When a profile isn't created by the woman herself it is  questionable, especially concerning attributes that most clients would have no clue about since it isn't a part of their typical session. The "2 Girl Action" category  is wrong more often than it is right, just as you'd expect when someone else fills it in other than the provider herself. Most guys filling in that stat wouldn't have a clue and just assume one way or the other. I long ago stopped looking at provider profiles here except to see her personal page link where I have a much better chance of finding or her true client preferences.

I was visiting a house and made a selection. As we headed up the stairs, we were followed by another member of the staff who popped into the room with us and asked if I was interested in a 2-girl session.  I declined. She left and me and my first choice got down to business.  While she's riding me CG, I was talking to her about the girl-girl stuff (and other stuff) and she said to me, "Actually, I'm a lesbian and I prefer girls."  I managed to finish, but it was kind of a mood killer.

Kinsey said:

There is no reason to assume that escorts have gender preferences that differ from the general population. Therefore one would expect the same distribution as in the civie world. Not accounting for the monetary motivation to appear so.

to argue that your opinion has credibility as a hobbyist, but you do it from your alias.  If you showed your reviews and I could see that you have seen a lot of providers that were "really bi" or a good number of doubles sessions you have reviewed, I would be more inclined to think you have the personal experience to back up your arguments.  As others have said, just crunching numbers requires too many assumptions.  I would rather hear about things you know from your OWN personal experience, like GaG, Lopaw and others post.  Vague allusions to "over the years" tells us nothing.  

I guess that if we are talking about "real life," then the distributions should be roughly similar.  (But maybe hobbyists and Providers are, in general, more adventurous and less inclined to suppress sexual feelings,compared to Kinsey's samples. That might skew things a little.)
.
Within the hobby, I quote lopaw (above): "Some providers are lesbian and told me that they don't want to mix business with too much pleasure."  And I quote me (above), when a Provider told me, "Actually, I'm a lesbian and I prefer girls," at least girls that she knows.  
.
I guess the Kinsey Scale Poll would have to break it down or specify "in your REAL life" and "in your HOBBY life."

The myth that most providers are lesbians has been bouncing around for a long time. One possible source is a 1968 Playboy interview with Truman Capote. While discussing the Holly Golightly character from “Breakfast at Tiffany’s,” Capote made the unsubstantiated claim that 80% of prostitutes are lesbians. Both Capote and Playboy were pop culture icons at the time, so their words had a credibility even without any evidence to support them.

... is to have the providers create them. However, when I suggested that, the idea got very little support, and in fact you were one of the few people (and only woman) to support that suggestion.

... and any other posts from aliases if you wish.  I have the right to post under my alias, and you have the right to ignore my posts if you choose.  Since you think I'm lying in my posts about my experience, it's probably better you don't waste your time with them.  

have expressed an interest in lesbian activities, or at least FMF activities.   I've engaged in the latter with quite a few of them.

So defensive.  I was just suggesting that if you've come to argue, you should show, or give, your credentials as to why you should be taken seriously.  You have been here less than a year, unlike other alias's or member's without reviews that have been here 5 or 10 years, TALKING ABOUT THEIR OWN EXPERIENCES.  You post a lot of "opinion" but don't say how you learned these things through specific examples that would lend credibility like they do. I'm just suggesting how your arguments could be more persuasive or effective.  You are free to ignore ME rather than feeling compelled to respond from such a weak position.

I would say I'm a Kinsey 2... maybe 2.5.

Then why in the fuck do you still quote said data and use it as the basis of your argument.  

... of a self-professed troll.

You carry a purse CDL...

Metaphorically, men are a '55 Chevy while gals are a Ferrari.

have been the fat, white and yellow envelopes in the past?  If that's true, then yes, being around that long gives you some credibility on a variety of topics, but it raises the obvious question, why did you have to keep changing your name?

Agree... you cannot assume anything "personal" about a provider based on their profile or even the specific activities you observe or engage in with them.  
.
I've met people who work at McDonalds who are vegetarians, I know some who sells weed (legally now in California) that don't smoke it or take any recreational drugs. I know people who work at a church who are atheists. There are sure to be providers who are heterosexual, homosexual, bi-sexual, pansexual, and even a-sexual in there personal life, and yet they provide services to clients that don't correlate with their own sexual (or non-sexual) preferences or desires.  
.
At the end of the day, who the fuck cares? You are booking sessions with providers for specific services for a specified amount of time - nothing more.  If you must have sex with someone who's personal sexuality aligns with your preferences, we call that a relationship... and even then, you could (will? end up disappointed.

"No offense guys, but women are better looking than you and I bet you think so too. "

really a suitcase . . . . on wheels.  I keep my fortune in quarters.  

Good question!  Other questions related to profiles--how does the first reviewer know:

We can move on to your other point later, but for the meantime, I read your post as a concession that the numbers are bullshit and not to be relied upon. Is that a fair statement?

If Truman Capote was taking the poll, maybe they told him "lesbian" to have an excuse to turn him down.  (Like the Samoans telling Mead what they thought she wanted to hear, rather than the truth.)
.
I wonder how many of my dates switched teams after meeting me?  

... her lack of experience and/or confidence with another woman 1-on-1.  It is nice to know that right up front so that neither of us wastes the other's time. As experienced a lady monger as I am, I do prefer providers to be a bit aggressive and take the lead in our session. Nothing sexier to me than a sexually aggressive woman who has no hesitation in taking what she wants. Fortunately there seems to be no shortage of ladies who are eager to take control of a horny woman

You're asking me to concede something I already conceded.  I said in my OP that there's no way to know if the "really bi" flag is accurate for every provider.  My point wasn't about whether each data point in a profile is reliable.  My thought was that if MOST providers are TRULY bi-sexual (which was the OP's question), there would be many more "really bi" profiles than there are.  (For one thing, many of those truly bi-sexual providers would want to advertise that by ensuring their profiles reflected it.)

You state that bi-sexual providers would want to advertise this fact "by ensuring their profiles reflected it" but in the very next breath you lament the fact that the profile is NOT created by the provider. Talk about talking out of both sides of your mouth, but lets move on to your argument that the profile should be created by the provider herself.

...An honest question: why does a provider's Bisexuality mater ? As long as they are doing the agreed-to job I could care less.

Why is that a contradiction?

... which applies to p4p in general, but in this case specifically:  When do you have more fun at a party?  When you're the only one having fun, or when everyone is having lots of fun?

As long as I can get mine too, I just like to fuck! I'm definitely bi sexual,  tri sexual... whatever,  I just like to fuck. I have to say though, sex with a man is different than sex with a woman but it's ALL fun as long as we all get off. I couldn't "fall in love" with a female, I can certainly enjoy fucking her brains out 😚
XOXO  
TL

... as I prefer that the provider be genuinely into women.  It's no different than any other client's preferences. We all prefer different things. If we  didn't there world be no reason for profiles or lists of services offered.

The saying may come off ignorant but idgaf. I've been out for over 10 years at as a bisexual woman. Yes, I even went through the awkward, "sitting parents down on the couch" event.  

By your way of thinking, why even have reviews at all? We can just take the lady's word that her pics are accurate, she really is 25 and not 45, 120 lbs, not 180 etc etc etc.

and then wonders why I question whether he has ever written any reviews himself.  Geez.  

I like women as friends, and havs had a few bi experiences...but prefer men,  But yes most women ive met in this business  are    Bi Sexual..😚

but since hookers tend to be more open minded about sex in general and most can separate sex from all the emotions that go along with sex with most other women, I do believe the number of providers that are at least somewhat bi is higher than in the general population at large. Or perhaps they are just more likely to act on their "curiosity".  

So its nice to. know..Your Heterosexual Man..👿

Women can be straight, gay, bi, or simply "bi curious"  

Are you denying that you played the Construction Worker in the Village People from 1977 to 1979?

He's always running around calling people "Cocksucka!" What does that tell you?

Say what you want about me, but I am still very much alive.  

THAT is funny as hell, not to mention true. lol

I have no idea how such rumors get started.

If someone called you a cocksucker, whether true or not, you would just challenge them to mortal combat.  If you killed them, then it was deemed that they were lying.  If he killed you, they would stand around your body and say, "The cocksucker's dead" but at least you didn't have to hear it again.  

I didn't say or even hint at anything like that.  I was clear that reviews serve as a verification device in case of a profile being inaccurate (and there's also problem reports).

probably a 2
interested in certain TS providers and have a Mfm fantasy