Write Review
2,075,347 Total Reviews 3,940 New Reviews
11,826 Users Online

TER General Board

I think it's a crappy idea. but I'm not surprised, considering the source
dman 5211 reads
posted

I suggest that the numerical scores are all subject to interpretation.  These ladies are people, not numbers.  And if you weren't a virtual illiterate, you could read their reviews and know that the numbers vary widely, and you cannot distill the essence of the experience with any of them down to ONE number.  BTW, is that number the performance average, the looks + performance average, or some weighted formula?  And who decides this algorithm?  And do you increase the weighting with more reviews, and do the scores get calculated contingent upon certain aspects of the performance, etc, etc, ad infinitum.  Read the damn reviews, if you can.  It will inform you.

MathTeacher6035 reads

Wouldn't it be wonderful if when you are scanning the the list of providers sorted by date, if their was a column with basic imformation like ... average review.  It would save a lot of scanning time to be able to zone in on those providers who consistanly provide good service.

suggestion:

just as the RBI leader is based on a min. number of games, so should the ave. review value require a certain number of reviews.

ReplyQuoteReport
Felicia FoXX6332 reads



-- Modified on 1/30/2002 1:54:04 AM

ReplyQuoteReport
dman5212 reads

I suggest that the numerical scores are all subject to interpretation.  These ladies are people, not numbers.  And if you weren't a virtual illiterate, you could read their reviews and know that the numbers vary widely, and you cannot distill the essence of the experience with any of them down to ONE number.  BTW, is that number the performance average, the looks + performance average, or some weighted formula?  And who decides this algorithm?  And do you increase the weighting with more reviews, and do the scores get calculated contingent upon certain aspects of the performance, etc, etc, ad infinitum.  Read the damn reviews, if you can.  It will inform you.

ReplyQuoteReport
MartinLuther4846 reads

this post belongs in Suggestions/Policy, not here.
You may not like my response.
But then, you asked.
LM

ReplyQuoteReport
MathTeacher5129 reads

Vengful, aren't we.

I DO know something about you. You HAVE TO BE RIGHT, and will not let AMYONE else have their opion.

ReplyQuoteReport
MartinLuther5707 reads

--

ReplyQuoteReport
dviantboy6239 reads

Good thing you're teaching Math, not English.  Provider could probably give you some lessons, my friend.  ;-)

DVB

ReplyQuoteReport
ZedEx6378 reads

..."vengeful", "anyone", and "opinion" are the correct spellings.

As mentioned below you can (if you a VIP member) search for providers by their average ranking.

-- Modified on 1/30/2002 9:12:21 PM

ReplyQuoteReport
dviantboy4851 reads

dman, you're full of crap.  You have 25 reviews, all of which have numerical rankings and it looks like they reflect your reviews.  All Teach is looking for is a display of a filter that is already available, as Provider so eloquently pointed out.  And, yeah yeah, I've added a pint of testosterone, too.  Whatever.

DVB

ReplyQuoteReport
dman5442 reads

And THAT single number could represent just about any weighting, and it was not clear WHO's weighting that it DID represent.  As Provider pointed out, The database search function in the reviews that exists.  I would add that this existing function is FAR more useful than what MathTeacher was suggesting, but it also requires a TINY bit more effort to use.  I admit that Provider's response was more constructive than mine.  I too have learned a lesson from "Provider" here (I poured on some extra testosterone in my answer here due to some BS that MathTeacher was spewing at me in a prior thread, and I shouldn't have).  I would add that THIS lesson from Provider was not as much fun as the lesson she gave me previously in the "proper" way to eat a lady's pussy  :-)

ReplyQuoteReport
slickwillie4649 reads

step outside of class for awhile and observe all the wonderful ladies. It's not about bottom line numbers, it's about personal preference! Damn.......didn't you learn anything in school besides math?

ReplyQuoteReport
carlspackler6104 reads
.



-- Modified on 3/30/2002 6:35:52 PM

ReplyQuoteReport
provider5281 reads

Review rankings you don't want to read will not come up in your search.  It is already sorted by date.  Basic search vehicle 101 technique.  Guess it isn't a bad idea if TER already decided to do it.
Whew!  There is way to much testosterone flowing today.  Use your hand!  I won't tell anyone!

-- Modified on 1/30/2002 8:01:59 PM

ReplyQuoteReport
Purelust6079 reads

something meaningless. Lighten up guys. I'm supposed to be the only ass here. And dman, would I rather be right, or would I rather be happy? I would rather be happy. But of course you have the right to make your own choice.

ReplyQuoteReport
Post Reply Back To Forum
Register Now!