I'm just curious guys.  How does someone post a review of "10", once in a lifetime, and then talk about getting a CBJ?  Are some of us so hung up on looks that performance is secondary?

Could it be that his idea of a great BJ is not the same as yours and maybe, even maybe a BJ is not all that important to him.

He might have had the performance of his lifetime, regardless what went on and what was covered.

mine are taking four days or more to get approved so I would suspect that somebody is actually *looking* at them to be sure they conform to the rules.....

How effing hard is this to figure out? YOU were not there. Unless you were sitting in the corner watching the play by play, just get the f/k over it.

Jayzus Christ, get over yourselves guys. Seriously. Your standards are not shared universally. Hence, your 10 and someone else's 10 aren't necessarily the same. Deal with it.

guys are always giving performance scores that don't conform to TER guidelines... Not to mention the subjectivity of appearance...

And yes, it is possible to have a great CBJ. As sins suggested... Get over it.

the performance marks as oppossed to the appearance marks?

The appearance marks are subjective. The performance marks are supposed to follow certain standards. Nothing no one else hasn't told you already.

BTW; you're correct that i would like to get a cbj "ONCE" in my lifetime.

bbbj was offered, and everything else required for a 10 in performance was on the menu, but the guy, for his own reasons asked for a cbj. Just a theory, but quite possible. Plus, some gals out there can make a cbj feel very much like a bbbj.

there are very few virtuosos of the cbj but they do exist....

Shouldn't it be up to the guy what the performance was? Rating system or not..they people doing the rating weren't there and didn't feel or see anything.

And besides, she may have very personal reasons for not doing bbbj.

Never had a CBJ. I think I would feel too funny watching someone lick latex to enjoy it, but as someone above said, I'm sure the girls have their reasons.

It seems to me that some of us are so hung up on BBBJ that they cannot have a 10 without it.

A gal I am seeing in my civvie life loves to give me bbbj's and she's very good at it. She's not much for intercourse and we don't do that very often. So when I hobby I look at the BJ, covered or otherwise, as nothing more than prep for some fucking. I don't care if a provider sucks my dick I get plenty of that in my civvie life. I want to sink the pink.

There have been descriptions of BJs that start out BB and, somehow or other, ninja-like, you end up cloaked but you don't even notice it. It just feels so good you'd swear it was BBBJ. I've known a couple of condom ninja girls like that.

"Once in a lifetime" because, after the first time, you become suspicious if it's someone not known to do BBBJ but it feels too good: a quick peek or feel spoils the fantasy.

In looking at the Performance FAQ, it states that a provider is eligible to receive a rating of up to 7 and can only receive a higher rating if she offers (among other things) a BAREBACK BJ. By definition and objective TER standards, it would seem that a *covered* BJ would make the provider ineligible to receive a rating of 10.

While most of the review is subjective, there are some objective standards to which we agree when we become TER members, right?

Don't knock CBJ's.  I had one from a provider in another locale that I'd been wanting to see for a while.  I knew it was CBJ, but was interested enough in her personality I'd read in the reviews(and she was exactly my body type) and I had to continue.

You could not have convinced me it was a CBJ had I not seen the condom on my junk as it was happening.  Wow.  Girl had talent.  Not sure how she did it, but I did not feel short changed at all!  Now obviously, there was no CIM, but short of that, it was a great BJ.

I've had FAR worse uncovered bj's...to be sure.

review standards to give a 10.  I just avoid ladies that do CBJ.  There are guys that request it ot of fear of STD's, and ladies who only offer it for the same reason.

This isn't rocket science...don't like CBJ, make sure to do your homework.  I've passed on a couple of absolute hot ass ladies because of it.

As for a 10 with a CBJ....Nope, doesn't qualify by TER guidelines, or mine....and I've given a few 10's

BBBJ is not required by TER guidelines for a 10. Rare combination I suppose, but possible.

rats ass how fucking Bi they are.  That should only count in doubles.  The only good it does me is the fact that she doesn't mind DFK AFTER DATY!

I stand corrected, it is possible, but shouldn't be!  

Get rid of that Bi shit (most are just gay for pay) and put something important....BBBJ!

hot little number, and she joined another lady friend and me for an extended dinner date.

She danced for us, played with us, ate with us, drank with us, and at the end of the night we DP'd her (the other lady friend with a strap-on).  She had such an orgasm she literally couldn't even walk afterward.

Once in a lifetime, in my book.

Regardless of what the TER rules are about giving a "10" (I always thought that a BBBJ was requirement also) a covered would never be considered a "10" to me.  I am a lover of DATY and I've never done that covered so figure that it's only fair.  I know that some girls don't do it and that's fine - to each their own.  I prefer to find someone who not only will do a BBBJ but enjoys it!

like a once in a lifetime experience to me. the gainsayers should take heed.

WOW!!  So many comments.  So many points of view.  I guess what I was trying to say is that a "10" to me would have to be more of a PSE.  As a younger man I had plenty of BBBJ from some pretty hot civilian women, as well as everything else you can think of uncovered, with lots of lust and passion.  I just don't think I could ever describe an experience that included CBJ as being "once in a lifetime".  I'm not sure I could say which one of my more outrageous memories would fit the bill.  But at my age, the only thing I am sure of is that I've already had that "10".  ( Sigh)

It is a subjective business.

TER is creating a values judgment that the rest of us have to work with and are limited by, and virtually dictating to providers that they need to offer these services for the review system here to be of benefit to them...