As most members know, TER's policy is to delete your old review  on provider X if you post a new one on provider X. An understandable policy since TER doesn't want to reward with VIP status and otherwise condone mere repetition if there is a lack of further helpful info.

But I occasionally have this situation: I've reviewed a provider, given (say) a very high grade (e.g., 9/9). It was completely truthful. I thought she was fantastic. I also got the impression (I'd mention it in the review it if were otherwise) that this was the provider's standard service, that I was not benefitting from the upside of YMMV.

Then I see her again maybe 2 weeks later. It is again a fun time, but (say), I notice some other things: perhaps something offered before is now off the menu; or perhaps I see that occasionally she is more good natured than other times, or perhaps it's just an off day for her, or she's not feeling her best.

The point is obvious: there's a dilemma. On the one hand, one wants to provide other hobbyists with additional data. On the other hand, one doesn't want to penalize a provider with, say, a 9/7 (even if justified that day) if it also means deleting the prior 9/9 that was truly earned.

Or maybe her hours have changed, or she has a new look (new body art, new piercing, new hair color or style). OTOH, hobbyists might want to know that; on the other hand, is it really worth generating an entire new review for this info?

What do other hobbyists do in this situation?