Last week I saw someone who's boobs were listed as a D in her profile. She didn't show them on her website and when I saw them they were a B at best. she had implants but they looked like a couple of small peaches were shoved under her skin. Not "super nice"
Do you put in her profile the same thing she puts in her ad? If she says she's a D, do you just take her word for it? Maybe men aren't the beat judges of breast size but it doesn't take a rocket scientist to tell the difference betwee a B and a D.

I think a reviewers primary responsibility is to his fellow mongers, repeating a lie does the exact opposite.

To me breast size is far from the most important factor in choosing a paid date, but for many (breast men) it is one of the most important factors for them. It is quite conceivable that a woman could lie about her cup size and use only flattering pictures, helped by a push up bra to make herself look larger than she is.

I think the OP should be truthful in his review, and that is my position on everything where it comes to reviews.

for the stats needed to create the original profile.
when they write the review they don't ask themselves, "how tall was she?" or "how old was she?"  They just used what the provider put on her website.
That's why you will see providers who are 10 years older than what it says in there profile. Or have breasts 2 sizes smaller.
Problem reports are fine but TER won't change it unless you have proof. Your word alone won't change it if she has 20 other reviews after the profile was created and nobody else said anything.

The provider I saw said she was a D in her website but had no nude shots, only in clothes. The first reviewer listed her as a D even though it was obvious she was a B. He just went by her website and didn't trust his own eyes. Other reviewers after him maybe put a B but it's hard to change the original profile.

word aginst the guy who created the profile. Why should TER believe me if I say she has B not D cups, even though its true? TER may think I want to hurt her business by saying she has smaller boobs so it will stay D unless there's real evidence.

You didn't see any pics of her ahead of time?  The main reason I don't bother to use a different cup size is that no matter what I put down, it's not going to change her profile unless I submit a problem report.  And what's the point anyway.  Besides, I always have a good idea of what they look like courteous of my research on he, seems like you did not do enough of that if you were not happy.

Swim

You could file a problem report and someone could change it again later. Put it in the body of your review. Honest but not attacking.

as long as it seems "right".  It can be hard to correctly guage with all the push up & padding out there.  If I think the web site or ads are full of BS, I'd include that in the intro as a first impression (no rose).  
skb

no I dont sneak I just ask. Some show me their bra to prove their size, some don't.
it is easy to tell after looking at it though.

It doesn't help putting it in the review menu selection sjnce it doesn't change the original most of the time.
better to mention it in the juicy details...

As a big breast fanatic, I also find this to be a real pet peeve, right up there with the fucking tards out there that can't distinguish "baby fat" from grossly obese.  I spend a lot of time doing problem reports on both of these issues.  

What if it is???

http://www.novafm.com.au/article_nasa-bra-boosts-boobs-when-women-are-horny_105881

was listed as White. She had a East Europaen accent. Other reviewers said this too so I reported it and her ethnisity was changed to Baltic. If it was me against the profile it would't of been changed. But there was a few of us so that was enough proof. The guy who made the profile probaly didn't know what Baltic was.

Cup sizes are not universal. So you say her breasts looked like a B cup to you, but was she really small framed? Her bra size/ boob job size may have very well been a 32 D. But if you are use to "bustier" women, then a 36 D or 38 D may be what you were anticipating. If you ever hold up a 44 D bra, you could wear that as a hat! But a 32 D well, you could neatly fit a muffin in one of those cups!

In a recent case, there was an attractive (no, beautiful) provider with MSOG = Yes in her Profile. Curiously, the FIRST reviewer, the one who created the Profile, actually wrote that he was denied MSOG but offered another shot for an additional fee. Seven of eight reviews said they were denied msog or given an upsell for more (but all refused the offer) and the one claiming YES to msog didn't sound so convincing (maybe not remembering all the details of his session) to me.  

A Problem Report, with reference to each reviewer, got her Profile changed to MSOG = Sometimes.  (Now I know that "Sometimes" means "More money!")

Those written details DO help lone complainers get unreliable Profiles changed.  

If a bunch of reviewers all say the same thing about boobs (size, implants, etc.) in their Details, it should help to make the Profile more accurate by facilitating action on a Problem Report.

As I said above, if reviewers include their estimates in their written details it makes fixing Profiles easier. Just a few words help.

"Her Profile said baby fat but I thought she was very overweight ... "
"There is no way that she is a 36D.  I'd estimate 32C. ..."
"Her Profile says 32C but that was before her boob job. She is now 36D and rock hard. ..."
"She no longer wears her hair short and black as stated in the Profile. It is mid-back light brown now."

A lot of us don't really know what the size-letter combo means ... we just know a nice handful when we feel it!  Anyway, wikipedia (and other websites) explain what the numbers and letters are supposed to mean.

TER needs to make an unobtrusive pocket tool so we can conveniently measure and record relevant info during a meeting.  Not just bra size measurements, but maybe a magnet or built-in stud finder to find all the piercings; a small color sample chart (with a check box or memory marker or take a snippet with you) so we can get her hair color correct; a "stubble depth gauge" (with memory setting) so we can properly report "shaved" v "partially shaved" - I mean, once your stubble is over 2 mm, you're no longer shaved, just trimmed; a tiny pair of calipers to measure fat around her love handles (baby fat v obese); or maybe a tiny portable conductance meter (with memory) to measure fat v muscle; and maybe a tiny pin-prick blood test meter to measure oxytocin (controversial as an orgasm marker) or other markers of a genuine not-faked orgasm.

Getting her to agree to the blood test could be tricky, but if you just ask "Do you mind if I prick you?" she'll probably say OK.

TER could use profits from the pocket tool to offset membership fees.

Remember, it's all in the interest of getting more accurate Profiles.