that are pissed are only pissed because they want the women to see that they are.

Every review I've written since starting on this site in 2006 has been an alias because I NEVER tell the woman what my TER handle is.  Nothing's new except the limitation on their ability to fuck with the guys.

And no, you won't get many responses from real men because of said ability of the women to fuck with the guys' hobbying with DNS and Blacklists for retaliation of board posts.

Almost all future reviews from me will be under an alias, (unless it is a provider that I am close with and I give her the option of alias or my real handle)

No need to expose my personal shit on every post I make under the real handle.

In fact, I've replaced some old reviews of the girls I repeated, so that it isn't associated to my handle.

Soon I may run the risk of people seeing less than 2 or 3 reviews on my handle, thinking I'm a noob. lol

Know who they're seeing by my handle.

And btw, whatever it was that made her leave I'm all for. lol

Another thing I wonder about is the ability to continue to use my white-listings as a way to ease pre-screening.  Does doing alias reviews preclude this?

Do the alias reviewers still get free vip for turning in the review?  
(the alias identities have to be linked to the original user ID somehow just as the post counts are)

In the past I've had gentleman try and submit reviews to TER and they were refused because the reviewer did not have a presence on the discussion boards.    

So how are those 2 options going to work?  

Anyone know or care to comment?  

I've seen alias reviews done on other boards before.  
I would prefer to be able to use whitelists and reviews as a screening tool, but it I can't; then I can't.  

Any reviews that I can't screen the reviewer are worthless. I have no clue there tastes, how hard a reviewer they are, and the like.

There is one guy that I believe writes shill reviews for a certain agency as all but one of his reviews are of that agencies girls and they are all glowing except for that one. If he started to use aliases I wouldn't have noticed the pattern. There is anther guy that tends to review a bit low his best review he gave out is a 7/7 out twenty ladies that get normally much higher. How would I know a 6/7 was a high score from him if he used an alias each time?

Add that to the fact that the most common use of an alias is to remove any accountability. Fake reviews were already an issue, aliases will make that problem much worse in my opinion.