Looking at the Ad Board, I see a number of Ads for virtual sex... face time.. or Zoom stuff. Has anyone tried it? Can a review be done? Personally, I can't see how it might fit the bill, but everyone is different.
Once i scheduled a very hot couple.. who still advertise here.. went to their room.. watched them have sex.. and got myself off.. but it was not really satisfying.. not for me anyway. I have also participated in an MFM.. and enjoyed it a lot.. so being a voyeur works for me.. but not virtually is my expectation. So wondering what sort if experience others have had. Over 70.. so wanting to be careful about the obvious..
Thanks
Were having lunch today. lol I have always offered Virtual Fun, but everyone's needs are not the same. Set up a consultation, so we can focus on your goals..
TER guidelines are pretty clear that a meeting in the flesh must occur for a review to be published.
Thats what I thought Fish.. wondered if TER may have adjusted their rules to accomadate
Personally I think it's a lousy idea, but I wasn't consulted
Yes, was thinking of that but it is a conditional one it seem. Perhaps an open question but clearly was implemented due to the impact of COVID on in person meetings.
That said, just HOW can anyone give more than a 7 in performance for a virtual event -- no DFK, BBBJ or anal? Seems that really bi might get you to an 8 (and I forget if they ever added more than 1 guy as a point eligible act). But not if they are on different cameras.
I didn't ask the question to make Fish look bad.
I am genuinely interested... so ...now that we know that this can be reviewed has anyone seen one? Obviously not..
either before or after his answer. I suspect he just forgot about the special exemption that was made a few months back.
In the defense of fishbro, up until recently that was the policy of TER.
Personally I wish he were right, I think "virtual sex" reviews are worse than just a waste of time. I think they have the potential to either increase or decrease a providers overall rating based on a service I will NEVER partake in.
And don't worry about fish, he has MORE than enough friends who have his back, myself included.
As for checking out any virtual reviews, you might try checking the reviews of the ladies advertising on the "virtual" ad board, they are the ones most likely to have "virtual" reviews.
I was kidding... I know he can take it
the point of relaxing the point system for virtual sex when it requires certain activities to earn a good score for in-person sex. Allowing 1-10 for virtual sex punishes the women who are actually seeing customers. How exactly do they get to 10 in virtual sex? Do they stick out their tongue to the camera to simulate DFK? Do they stick a dildo in their mouth or ass to get two more points for a 10? It just seem ludicrous to me. That's not he same as having a guy pumping your ass with his dick.
I agree the absolute max for virtual sex should be a 7, the same as with a massage. Otherwise, it creates a disincentive for a provider to actually see a guy when she can get a potentially better score from just doing a zoom session.
Scrap the ENTIRE idea of "virtual sex" reviews altogether.
There really is no comparison to phone, skype, video sex with the real thing. As you said, just because she will stick a finger or dildo in her mouth or ass says NOTHING about what she will do in person.
At the very least I think "virtual sex" reviews should not be mixed with a providers "real" reviews and there should be a completely separate section for them much like their is a separate section for "massage parlor girls"
a separate review section makes a lot of sense, because it really is apples and oranges.
I think it's more a comparison of Apples and the twigs from an apple tree. I would get about as much satisfaction from a "virtual" session as I would from a nice helping of twigs. lol
grossly under valuing all the fiber in those twigs. LOL
On a serious note though, the rationale for allowing these was that most people were not participating, on either side, and the thinking was the providers MIGHT be able to at least pay the bills and eat if they could setup the video show. The reviews would then allow the same type of feedback/validation as session reviews do.
I don't know if that is really still the case, seems like there are a number of ads available -- other than internationally touring girls which cannot get visas for anywhere pretty much. If not we probably should scrap the whole thing, unless there really is a niche here that is growing. In the later case, clearly the reviews should not be mixed in with real, in person session reviews. A lot of ways that could be implemented without too much effort I think.
Say Melons and Berries, not apples and oranges. I stand corrected, Lester.
Fully agreed. It's not even apples and oranges. It's apples and glue. How can one evaluate a hooker session by their videos?
What the fuck ? Ugh.
Nasreddin Hodja once said that whoever sells the smell of food shall receive payment in sound of money.
Looked at some of the ads there...not one had a review for virtual sex..I don't tnink anyone is jumping on that wagon
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
We thank you for your purchase!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!
