Made an appointment to see Sara, a Thai provider, at 9:30 a.m. for one hour.  Got started on time, her English is limited but everything went well.  I would give her a 7 for appearance and an 8 for performance.  At the end of the hour we were cuddling and chatting, she was clingy which I like and we were both enjoying ourselves so I just let it go on.  She seemed unconcerned with time, said her next appointment wasn’t until the afternoon, so we just kept chatting and cuddling.  Eventually we started kissing again and although MSOG is not usually on my agenda, lo and behold we ended up going for another round.  Although I initiated the kissing she initiated the sex; I was not expecting it and wasn’t even sure I could do it.  

Booker should have made sure that Sara was aware more money is required before extending a visit.
I feel sorry for Sara in this situation seems like booker kinda just threw her out there. From how you
described it, you did nothing wrong. I understand why you would feel sorts bad though.

I'm not saying it's wrong to want more time, but you KNOW if you book for an hour and stay two there is a good chance she won't be impressed. Let me outline this for you:

When will YOU ever learn

I get it, guys can be a PITA with wanting more and more and more. I really do. I don't think your gig is a walk in the park. But if even I know that, then she surely knows that. And if she knows that then:  

Yup, which is why I can't extend a date unless I know him. It's both tacky and awkward to have to add more to what's already there. If he does not know how long, I can't really go on a maybe. We have lives and schedules that might conflict. Now, if he already says coming in that he might want to extend if we hit it off, no problem. I can plan for the extra time but that whole donation addition is still off putting.  

(Or 3 sides if you throw in the booker.) I agree with skarpie.

But she's not asking for advice and the ladies already discuss kick out routines pretty regularly lol

did you want the entire novel? Lol

It was a "yes or no" question.

If the girl had said OTC even though her English is limited, then fair enough.  But she didn't, and you assumed that it would be.

I saw a lady on a trip. She was not ready but offered a drink, munchies and tv. I clarified that this was otc. Had a great time and she decided to come to dinner with me. I offered some money which she declined. Never assume. Always ask.

seriously, I pretty sure I know the booker and saw one of her girls a while ago. If Sara is anything like Summer she only knows 3 or 4 phrases in English.  She will probably add "time is up" very soon.  

This thread isn't about me

-- Modified on 9/30/2015 1:07:46 AM

Why, oh why did you assume you were OTC? You have engaged the services of a hooker. She is not providing you sexual services for her own fun or any other reason, save monetary compensation. I'm sure you're Casanova, Don Juan, and Brad Pitt all rolled into one, but she is still a hooker, and you are only there because you are paying her for her services!

No, if all hookers believed people were responsible for their actions, your mother would have swallowed. Or at least drank heavily enough that you came out unable to work a keyboard like a responsible person. Not that it appears she would have had to try much harder.

I suspect this will be controversial, but here goes anyway.  In contract law it is generally presumed that a service provider or contractor is the knowledgeable professional in a  agreement. It is generally the case that the fees and services are specified and enforced by the contractor as a professional. There appears to be no difference here. If this is her business, she should be controlling the situation. I know there is this idea floating about OTC, but strictly from a business perspective this concept is not normal by any means. I suspect it would not survive legal scrutiny were it to occur in any other profession..

It's different if she's independent and you two have a long history then and only then you might be able to interpret it as OTC . OTH you should have known that she will have to answer to her boss/agency and you seemed to take advantage of her naivete/inexperience in addition to lack of English skill. Maybe she just assumed that you can stay and fuck as much as you like then pay the full bill at the end -the way one dines at a restaurant.

-- Modified on 9/29/2015 11:00:20 PM

The time is almost up and client got another erection and he stood there expectantly waiting for me to "take care of it". I got dressed, ignoring it altogether, asked him if he wanted a quick shower before leaving. He stood there with his dick in his hand. I told him I have to be somewhere and to move it along or go without the shower.  

If the leach who is trying to manipulate more time for free doesn't get it, he can mess with her business by posting a unfavorable review in retaliation.  

By all means when you grow some balls and post under your real handle and not an alias, then i may play with you.

Hbyist+truth, you should have a sign that lights up with you at an ATM that says would you like to go again my friend.  The picture should be of you in jeans and some pumps with a small clutch.  That way he blatantly gets the message while thinking with his big head and little head.

...So I decided to take advantage of a situation knowing full well that there was a chance we weren't on the same page?!

Since when does someone answer the question "when" with a "yes or no?"

Did you miss this part..

Plain and simple: you knew the time was up; regardless of what she did, you should have either left or offered to pay for an additional hour.

He took advantage; he was wrong. Regardless of your legalese mumbo jumbo.

Thanks to all for the thoughtful responses, and I regret that some posters have indulged in unnecessary personal attacks (on each other, not me).  

Maybe that would stop the annoying posts (Hint...that is a yes/no question)?

Go ahead and make another alias.
You always do.

It has been years since i saw that sketch. I literally laughed out loud

Yes, he definitely took advantage of a new provider who didn't know how to properly communicate her wishes. "Maybe" this is one of those "spirit vs letter" of the law situations, but it's pretty obvious he took advantage of her.  

So, the ladies of DC and anywhere need to be more proactive and not let this type of shit happen. Just as johns should not reward hookers with fraudulent images etc get a away with it, hookers should not allow tricks to do that.  

and statements like his are completely irresponsible and WRONG.

I had already gone slightly past my time w/massage and chat, when he flipped over and started playing with his cock. He asked if I thought I could come again. I asked to use the bathroom and got dressed. As you pointed out, that is a VERY risky move, but there were mitigating circumstances. For one, he'd had a few to drink and the first time had been very difficult. Also, it was late...he was a few hours behind, time-zone-wise, so for him, it felt early in the evening...I, on the other hand, was weary and also had a 90-minute drive ahead of me. And most importantly, I could tell he KNEW that he was taking advantage. It was calculated, not innocent. That irritated me.

If you read the prior posters comments regarding contracts, he is correct.  And in the event that there is a dispute a customer can write a review on Yelp about the services.  

I know a American woman that was basically a sex slave. She ran away from a horrible home situation and was desprate. A guy helped her out and turned abusive and forced her to sell sex. His tools of choice was turning her into LE who would arrest her and send her home (a fate she feared more than death) withholding the drugs he made sure she was addicted to and plain old violence. She has more than one scare from him. She had her first review during this time. She got several more before her handler got arrested for selling drugs.They don't give a damn about reviews as they will just change up names and/or move them if they are negative or paint a bullseye on her.

When people think that every hooker, especially every hooker from a different country is a sex slave, people get inured to the problem at the expense of the real victims.

Some foreign nationals are forced but more than are forced are not. Most reviewed ladies are here by choice but a few are not. Most Americans here are willing but a few are not. What having this in the shadows does is force everthing in the shadows and protects the bad players.

by sensationalizing sex slavery and making it sound as if all hookers are being trafficked the "do gooders" exacerbate the problem by keeping it in the shadows where real criminals are free to act.  

And the fucker FOLLOWED me to where I was going to continue his date. All in all, it was over 4 hours and three of them were spent trying to get rid of him after his appointment with him following me around town talking about how much he loved "hanging out" as I repeatedly told him to leave. Verbatim. Some of these guys are fucking insane.  

Isn't that what she said?

But for the most part your right. Buy opposing laws that will allow the ladies do what they do with full police protection allowing those that find find them coerced, robed, raped, or in otherwise in a place they need of help. Worse many of these "do gooders" are actually in it for plainly selfish reasons. Many get funds to help victims from they the government and spend it on largely discredited research and lobbying for more money. It sickens me.

Geez, I won't even entertain the thought of seeing a john that has been drinking. I smell booze and the session is ended right there. More power to you for dealing with that.

You would be surprised that some of the heavy hitters have done just that. You really think we hookers don't share this info?

I wouldn't see a lady if I believe a lady has been drinking, I am out of there. Nether side should put with disrespect or allow themselves to be taken advantage of.

and that's what she was responding to.  

Whoa there buckerooo, that's not what I meant at all. I did not link fear of saying no to language at all. Ease up.

You should.  

Just a strong smell of alcohol on his breath....just when I got close.

Well said.