I no longer pay attention to either the provider's (TER) profile info or some of the reviews. I move forward with contacting a provider based on a combination of 5 things; looks (can be deceiving by itself), price, gut feeling, number of reviews, and reading the reviewers other reviews to filter out the exaggerations.
The last 4 providers have not had the build or breast appearance that's reported on their profile. According to my last 2 providers, all of their reviews was a gross exaggeration of what really went on. I am sensitive to two things, however. 1. Men's perception is very subjective and not all but some will lie on a review just to satisfy a guy need to impress their peers with their wild imagination. 2. I had heard that the profile comes from the first reviewer. Perhaps a bbbj was given to the first because she's new but as time went on the provider became more about protecting herself. On the other hand, my 2nd to last provider had very flat and unattractive breasts, though the profile reported the breast appearance as 'Super Nice.' I can't think of a world when men would find her breasts as 'Super Nice'.
I think Claude Simon said it best which I think is TER's major weakness (with no clear resolution):
“To begin with, our perception of the world is deformed, incomplete. Then our memory is selective. Finally, writing transforms.”
Finally, It's true that no review site can guarantee a 10 or even a 9 or 8 on most of my visits so I'm not so critical of TER as I am on the reviewers. TER should show the profile info that came from each reviewer so it's no solely based on what the first reviewer experienced.