Just because she falls asleep when YOU are shtupping her doesn't mean real men don't get TRUE shrieks of delight out of her. True, I tell you! Her eyes were open the entire 3 minutes.
I was looking at the ratings for a provider who has 4 pages (ten reviews per page)
She started in 2008 and the oldest three pages have a performance average of 8.1 but the last half of 2012 has an average of 6.8.
What do you make of this?
Scores themselves mean virtually nothing to me, which is why the Top 100 list is so meaningless.
Reading the reviews, I get the impression that the pictures that she is using may be a few years old and she is slightly less attractive. Current reviews report a lower enthusiasm level then she had a few years ago.
5 years deduct 10 years from their TER ages and websites.
And many use the same pics for years (and years and years).
So if she was 35 five years ago...she's now IRL near 50. You'd be exhausted too if you had been at this for 15 years with no exit.
The truth is that many providers here are well into their 30s and 40s. They're not fooling anyone. But that doesn't mean they can't look great.
As far as the "no exit" thing...yes, many providers get used to the money and very quickly realize that they can't find anything that pays nearly the same. So they are essentially stuck in this, because they never saved much from all the good times.
And when she shows up as a 35 y/o nice looking MILF...no problems.
But 15 years later and those same pics are still up...along with the TER age of 35-39...you then have...
The OP's comments.
Happens a lot.
As far as the "no exit" thing...yes, many providers get used to the money and very quickly realize that they can't find anything that pays nearly the same. So they are essentially stuck in this, because they never saved much from all the good times.
And I have given up trying to ask providers for their real age. Yes, you are right in that many lie about it.
But anyone who believes reviews and takes them at face value is an idiot.
That's the same fuckwad that buys stock based on a research report.
Not always true.... I've been around for 8 years, & have my real age posted on my website, 32. My TER profile also states age as 31-35(again, accurate). And I take new pics every 2-4 months. While your theory may hold some weight pertaining to some ladies, you can't put every one into the same category.
And many use the same pics for years (and years and years).
So if she was 35 five years ago...she's now IRL near 50. You'd be exhausted too if you had been at this for 15 years with no exit.
There was a reason I used 35 in my example.
Me thinks you'll still be 35 when you're 45.
And using those pics of you when you were 35 as well.
Oh...I did say "many"...NOT all LOL
And many use the same pics for years (and years and years).
So if she was 35 five years ago...she's now IRL near 50. You'd be exhausted too if you had been at this for 15 years with no exit.
we are at least 5 years older than we really are, and I have never fudged more than 2 ha ha. If I say I am 31-35, you are going to think I am damn near 40, when I might only be 32.
Early 30's there is not much need to "fudge" the age...but as you comment that some will by a couple of years.
But as women age..and hit that 35-40 age range...shit happens. It's life. Hence the photoshopped pics...age variances of 5-10 years...berating reviewers for telling the truth and so on!
Hopefully YOU will exit here in a year of so as you have commented previously. If not...we can revisit YOUR stats in 5-10 years and I will be willing to bet the farm that you'll still be 32 LOL
But as women age..and hit that 35-40 age range...shit happens. It's life. Hence the photoshopped pics...age variances of 5-10 years...berating reviewers for telling the truth and so on!
Hopefully YOU will exit here in a year of so as you have commented previously. If not...we can revisit YOUR stats in 5-10 years and I will be willing to bet the farm that you'll still be 32 LOL
But far too many have said the same thing.
And they're still here pretending to be 34 for the 10th year in a row ![]()
5 years advertise their age honestly; on TER and their website.
And many update their photos on a regular basis; not only to make sure they provide an accurate representation of themselves but also, with any luck, maybe they can minimize some of the negative assumptions you’re throwing out there.
So if she was 35 five years ago...now she will not hesitate to tell you she is 40.
But who could blame her if she was exhausted after 15 years of listening to this kind of relentless cynicism?
We can compare notes just using the hookers in ChiTown if you want.
Or just peruse all of the regional boards (and here on the GD board as well) for all of the complaints like the OP here is making. It's not an anomaly...it's the norm.
And those that stick around here for 15 years...and actually read this drivel...what a shame LOL
Only you and a couple of others actually give a shit about what's posted on this board. The others simply do their job...raise their family..and actually have a decent life.
You and the other sourpusses vent on this crap as if it is a personal attack on YOU. Always the narcissist hotplants...right?
And many update their photos on a regular basis; not only to make sure they provide an accurate representation of themselves but also, with any luck, maybe they can minimize some of the negative assumptions you’re throwing out there.
So if she was 35 five years ago...now she will not hesitate to tell you she is 40.
But who could blame her if she was exhausted after 15 years of listening to this kind of relentless cynicism?
Just because she falls asleep when YOU are shtupping her doesn't mean real men don't get TRUE shrieks of delight out of her. True, I tell you! Her eyes were open the entire 3 minutes.
That somehow in some crazy way you could ever picture ME and ole hotplants doing the nasty LOL
And I honestly think only the true lesbians get shrieks of delight out of her. Or so she screams...over and over and over
Or maybe those hookers were screaming that she wasn't paying them enough?
I do recall that my pal Back_In_Black may have gotten it on with her though...I think ![]()
Numbers are not the whole story.
... read the reviews. Don't just look at the ratings and averages. Read the "juicy" stuff and if the reviews are consistent over that period of time, then it's the reviewers that are being stringent about their ratings.
However... after reading the reviews and you see a fall-off of her performance and maybe her appearance, then you have something to think about.
Do a bit more homework and decide for yourself. We can't do the thinking for you.
Serpius
She started in 2008 and the oldest three pages have a performance average of 8.1 but the last half of 2012 has an average of 6.8.
What do you make of this?
Notre Dame wouldn't have had an opportunity to embarrass itself.
Thank those reviewers that are finally telling the truth ![]()
She started in 2008 and the oldest three pages have a performance average of 8.1 but the last half of 2012 has an average of 6.8.
What do you make of this?
I'm getting tired of your wit. Don't make me get up out of this chair!
Just tell me how much you want...and voila ![]()
Oh...you want me to sign the return as well?
Hmm...what are you offering?
And it's a bitch getting out of those old "bean bag" chairs...especially at YOUR age ![]()
it is called the law of diminishing returns..as long as her pussy doesnt wear out..you have no worries..
She started in 2008 and the oldest three pages have a performance average of 8.1 but the last half of 2012 has an average of 6.8.
What do you make of this?
Pussy can be surgically "repaired"