I know there's whole milk and skimmed, and gray suits and blue, and all sorts of other personal preference stuff, but how in the world can there be such huge differences in reviews such as for Jodie in Chicago (see TER review section)? Of 4 reviews, 3 agree that she's not the girl in the Eros-Chicago pic and a poor provider (2 of those call her a total rip-off with performance ratings of 1 while the 3rd is a little softer on her but still says she's absolutely nothing near the buxum beauty in the pic), and the 4th, which is the most recent, says she's the greatest thing since sliced bread (9/9 or in that range). Seems clear that either the 4th review is of a different girl and it got lumped in with the other 3 (name's maybe the same) or was written by Jodie or her boyfriend or mother. What other possible explanations, other than a total surgical and psychological re-build? Anybody out there know Jodie first hand and can confirm one way or the other who and what she is?
I dont know her at all, but is probably either two different girls or a phony review.
It might be that Jodie or her agency use that one Ad for multiple girls. Lots of bait and switch but from time to time the real one shows up (It also suits them that they can claim that the pictures are verified)
I know of a provider in SF that has other girls picked up on her calls when she is out of town or busy.
Since the fourth reviewer designy has quite a bit of reviews over long period of time, it is probably not a "planted" review. IMHO.
-- Modified on 7/13/2002 11:31:31 PM