I read this from time to time on many provider's ads. Not an uncommon thing right?  

And I've never had a girl ask me to sign a document forbidding a review.  That would be silly on a couple of levels.  First of all, what would be binding about it?  You certainly wouldn't sign it with your real name, would you?  Also, if she's on TER it would be grounds for de-listing.  Makes no sense at all.

That would very interesting to see how a provider would handle it,  

Have asked that I not submit a review.. One felt it could be used against her if LEO ever got involved.. but never a signed contract.. The contract is the product of an illegal act so that sort of contract cannot be supported (of course).. That is Contracts 101..

A contract to conceal a crime would be void. But you could properly have a contract not to reveal person information, I think. That would likely be enforceable -- assuming, of course, both parties know each other's names.  

perhaps with some high profile individuals ?
If lets say you are in Nevada where this shit is legal, and lets say  
I'm a Justin Bieber ( hahaha ) I may ask the provider to sign some kind of  
Confidentiality agreements , but as LamontCranston69 mentioned , you'd have to  
disclose your personal info . I don't know ,It seems like if you are rich and famous you  
have to fuck yourself LOL  (JK)  

Confidentiality agreements are completely worthless and unenforceable where it comes to illegal activities.

I have never been asked to NOT submit a review.  I have been asked to SUBMIT a review (assumption being we had a great session, etc....I have also been asked to do a NEW review-making it more current time wise, but to reiterate-I have never been asked (yet) to NOT do one.....And my thought is that if a gal is in the business and is on this and perhaps similar sites-if in the upfront discussions I was told DO NOT DO A REVIEW OF OUR SESSION-I would likely not have a problem with that as there would be no session to review !!

Actually it is not so clear the contract is automatically void ... because proving criminality is not automatic either.

to enforce things like this.

Wherein doctrines such as voidness for illegality could be raised.

If I were confronted by a provider with this type of contract I would immediately take my donation & leave & post a thread on my local board about this practice. Incidentally I tell the provider that I am a reviewer & if she has a reasonable objection I wont post a review.

We can always say "get a lawyer's advice."  The down side of that is that in just about every court case, 50% of lawyers end up losing.  
 

So the criminal aspect would only arise if one of the parties to the contract would be interested in pursuing a criminal case against the other party. Otherwise it stays as a civil proceeding. If the P4P details came out, either party would still have to prove it to nullify the contract, which takes the whole thing in another direction. I think what souls was saying is that that is unlikely because neither party would be willing to implicate themselves criminally to win a civil case. That would just be stupid. But some people are, I suppose.

-- Modified on 6/17/2016 3:38:38 PM

pursued by high profile individuals. I was only asked once to enter into one with a radio show person many years ago, but I declined the offer. The contracts wouldn't mention the business aspect- they are just attempts to protect the person with the most to lose if it got out that they slept with someone. As has been posted, the business aspect would render the contract useless. But there are also situations where SDs and SBs enter into these, such as in mistress cases. I've never seen such a contract, but it would be interesting to see how they're worded.

That in itself would be revealing the P4P aspect, and that would in turn nullify any non disclosure agreement as you can't have a ""legal" contract to not disclose details of a criminal act. So the entire premise is ludicrous and laughable, and makes about as much sense as an LE check

Escorting is not illegal. Escort services are illegal if the service being offered includes sex.
 Even TER when you google it - reads -
"The Erotic Review is the top community of escorts, hobbyists and service providers."

Come back after you've served your time and let us know how it went.

from one and other  
 I think I read one place how one nice respectful escort form TeR took her clint to court and judge did order him to pay?
 
I can t recall who did it and where I did read- but I did - may be someone would remind me this story and clarify Jacks state of mind  
regarding of escorts and sell of the sex?

My word is all she should need.

Gotta agree with GaG on this one. This thread is based on a contract of no reviews (if I'm correct) so if a review were published anyone would be fucked anyway that were crazy enough to get legal with It and take it to court.
Btw, this is the craziest and almost as stupid a thing as I have ever heard of!  A contract between an escort, a hooker, a courtesan (or whatever people call any of us) and their client,  is just plain freaking dumb Imho.  
Maybe pornstars? Yes, maybe I could see that but simply just a no reviews contract is.......well pretty much useless unless all involved are just idiots.  
Hugs and kisses
T

+1! If we advertise here we should expect a review if you are on here as well.  If there were such a contract,  it'd probably be best to not be on this site at all. This whole contract thing just is insane anyway UNLESS the lady is a pornstars. That, I totally get.
XOXO,  
TL

I'm with you on that one! Lol!!
XOXO,  
TL

not in practice.  Just ask Charlie Sheen.  For years, his standard non-disclosure agreement was just to prevent any woman from saying they had sex with him, with no mention of money involved.  Other celebs have had similar non-disclosers with hookers, groupies SB's, civvie girls, etc. They simply agree they will not ever claim they had sex with the celeb