TER General Board

Hey, stop making sense, wouldya? (eom)
mrfisher 115 Reviews 1547 reads
posted
1 / 24

Would you look at it?

I will be honest and say yes, but I'd hate myself in the morning.

romeogolf 34 Reviews 493 reads
posted
2 / 24

In order for there to be a Top 100 list for the best of the best of us guys there would have to be a review process underway  rating us as well, how else could we be fairly and properly listed ?

All I can say is, if there was such a "List" it would be especially humbling for most of us.

For some guys who have given a 5,6 or 7 to a lady in the looks category, or the guy who gives a " just laid there" performance review might just understand what it feels like to receive the same disappointing scores himself.

Just saying !

lovinladies6969 11 Reviews 248 reads
posted
3 / 24
WhitelistedAndLovingIt 202 reads
posted
5 / 24

...they have. It's more indicative of their character than simply the amount of reviews they write.

ReaganMoore See my TER Reviews 289 reads
posted
7 / 24
Dr Who revived 251 reads
posted
8 / 24

But would you change the parameters on how many reviews needed for that "top ten" list?  And possibly would it be shown by city?  Wow...that would really be an interesting list to see...nah...Just kidding :)

scoed 8 Reviews 236 reads
posted
9 / 24

But with great shame in doing so.

scoed 8 Reviews 229 reads
posted
10 / 24

I would likely see 2, 3, and 4's in looks and 4, 5, and 6's in performance. I would be stoked with anything above a 4. A mirror is all the humbling I need.

ReaganMoore See my TER Reviews 259 reads
posted
11 / 24

I think the number of reviews should be reasonable. You tell me what you think reasonable is. Some great guys only see companions a few times a year. Some see a few a week.

I really don't want to voice an opinion on how the list is weighted. I am not even on the top 100 in my city, and thats fine by me. There are threads below that continue to show that the debate on the review system and its resultant rankings. It will never be a perfect system. I know providers who are hell on wheels that are not on that list. I know companions who are on that list that not only have not had a review in a year, but their websites are down and last anyone heard they were no longer working.

Providers should have no ability to review and or comment on the guys. Its like holding a gun to the guys head for the review. Treat me well or you never see me again. No, guys should have the opportunity to be as non-biased and as independent as possible. Please note I said the " opportunity ". There are those who claim that we already hold the review card over guys heads. I wont comment since I personally don't.

As many of you know I am not a fan of the rating system. But it is a necessary evil. In your position you really do need every unique piece of information to make an informed decision. Making an uniformed decision can be a huge mistake. For every good encounter I am sure someone somewhere had a bad one. Bait and switch, rob, fat nasty fugly untrue photo chick etc. We the providers should not be placed in a position to coerce the outcome of the review.

Creating a top 100 list of guys will be as messed up as the top 100 list of companions. It will be rife with arguments over who is cute and who is handsome. Who is fat and who is skinny. And since women can be so extra caddy we will complain and rate on so many other issues. Trimmed, not trimmed, stubbled? The list goes on. Not to mention it will be rife with abuse and misuse. This happens on the provider side, rest assured it will happen on the client side.

In no way am I discounting that providers need a system to get the word out about idiot clients and unsafe situations, but we already have that.

Just my opinion.



MP67 11 Reviews 215 reads
posted
12 / 24

But I do know the ladies can review you as well as you review them.

I know this because, though I've never seen it, my friend at the time told me she reviewed me. Gave me high marks which helped to inflate my already overinflated ego...! ;)

But in all actuality, I think it would be a good thing to let some of us who think we're God's gift to knock us down a peg or two.

I say 'us' meaning us guys as a whole, even though I personally don't have to worry about a lady giving me anything than a fantastic score.

Seriously. I'm fuckin' me. Come on. Shit! ;)

MP67 11 Reviews 262 reads
posted
13 / 24

That would be THIS guy. Both times. ;)

ReaganMoore See my TER Reviews 254 reads
posted
14 / 24

You see, it starts already and there is not even a list. !!!!!!!!! lol

MP67 11 Reviews 210 reads
posted
15 / 24

The thing is, you can't share it.

Yeah, I know. As soon as I send it one or two ladies will ask for it.

You want a frontal, or a back view? Naughty or nice? ;)

GeishaOlivia See my TER Reviews 260 reads
posted
16 / 24

The most important thing to me in this biz is how a man behaves. I know a ton of guys who would be off that list, oh wait a min, they are on the blacklist lol

inicky46 61 Reviews 255 reads
posted
17 / 24
inicky46 61 Reviews 193 reads
posted
18 / 24

And the lower half of MP's face is completely hidden from view.  But there is a very nice shot of her tatoo (among other things)!

Duplicitouslust 24 Reviews 210 reads
posted
19 / 24

Dear Ms. Moore:
In light of the fact that you are in this demimonde as a provider what would be your ideal hobbyist\John? What the standards and stipulations that you would use to determine who would be in your top l00 hobbyist? Would you have a combination of gifts,sex,looks,money,and entertainment that would not be behind closed doors? Also would there be subcategories of this as well? Also finally would there be a point scale that you would give to these categories? Also what is the highest score anyone could obtain and from there would there be a tier of hobbyist so one could know how it is broken down? Also would there be regional provider associations and what is the minimum number of encounters over a period of time say a quarter before they could become eligible to qualify for ratings? Also Ms. Moore would there be a regional board and would the results of those be combined to see who would rank nationally? Also what would be the minimum standard for providers to meet before they could have a vote? Would the weight of their vote be in direct proportion to the activity they have with hobbyist? Also what makes a good hobbyist and then separate that in your categories with what would make an exceptional hobbyist? Then from there develop a list on who would match this description and why? Also although it may be a little subjective have two or more providers comment before he or she is put before the full voting committee of providers. Thus not making the selection arbitrary.

TrulyMsMocha See my TER Reviews 186 reads
posted
20 / 24

Posted By: mrfisher
I will be honest and say yes, but I'd hate myself in the morning.

MP67 11 Reviews 173 reads
posted
21 / 24

Oh well, she's delisted anyway so I guess it doesn't matter... ;)

inicky46 61 Reviews 204 reads
posted
22 / 24

Don't worry, even though you were drunk you did not spill the beans!

DoucheyLust 162 reads
posted
23 / 24

Don't you need to go into a corner and jack off?

tarasterling See my TER Reviews 158 reads
posted
24 / 24

When my friends ask for references I am always excited to say "Yeah, that one is so great!!!" It would be fun to be able to recommend my favorite people to one another.

Register Now!