Glad to say that this time honored technique of avoiding real response to a statement is till in use.
To throw one right back at you ... just cuz I don't mind my my own saliva doesn't mean I want someone else to spit in my drink.
For the non-overecucated:
REDUCTIO AD ABSURDUM*: (from Latin reduced to an absurdity) is a type of logical argument where we assume a claim for the sake of argument, arrive at an absurd result, and then conclude the original assumption must have been wrong, since it gave us this absurd result. This is also known as proof by contradiction. It makes use of the law of excluded middle - a statement which cannot be false, must then be true
My point is that to classify someone as closed minded because he doesn't enjoy something you do isn't a good argument. My example was that although most men would not like bukakke, others probably think it’s great. Most reach our threshold somewhere in the middle of the extremes and, for me, it helps to first examine the extremes to find where I might fall.
Using your scenario and his argument, you would be closed minded simply because you don't want to spit in the waiter's mouth and have him then spit it back into your glass. Or, using the first scenario and your argument, you may not want someone to serve you back your own load, but if you shoot in your own mouth its ok.
Closed minded might be defined as an unwillingness to hear argument where the open minded would be open to discussion. An example might be a Christian not willing to hear why a man might want to marry another man. Testing and trying the options doesn't make one open or closed minded, but merely open to experimentation, adventurous (used loosely), or uninformed. Using the same example, after the zealot hears the argument he isn't closed minded because he decides not to engage in activities discussed.
You're right, when it comes to someone spitting in my drink I'm not just close-minded, I'm down right bigoted.
To clarify ....
My response was meant to point out that your comment about bukakke was, in my mind, completely irrelevant to etienne's comment that he liked the taste of his own cum. The fact that you considered it an appropriate response to his comment was, to me, absurd, hence reducio ad absurdum.
As far as what I think you were getting to in you second paragraph. It all depends on who the wait-staff person is. If it were someone I'd be only too happy to swap spit with anyway, like Jenni of SD, Tattogirl, NOSC, etc, I'd love it if she served me back my own load. Nothing sexier than the taste of me on my lover’s lips.
AND
I agree with the plezher's answer below, I think it shows the women a certain level of respect. To go one step further, isn't it a bit hypocritical to rate provider (and civilian lovers for that matter) on their willingness to swallow your load when you won't do it yourself?
I would think it would lose something in the relay, myself. I think a bi threesome would be preferable, but I am sure that concept is anathema to most on here.
I personally am not adverse to doing a snowball, as long as it's mine. In addition it would really depend on who I am with, and how hot the session is.
Let's hope that you are not asking your provider to eat your boogers either.
Boogers aside, my experience is that snowballing sends a message to most women that you are not just using them, but are interested in sharing erotic experiences. All of which make the experiences more erotic, and so on and so on.
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
VIP MEMBER
, you are now a VIP member!
We thank you for your purchase!
VIP MEMBER
, Thank you for becoming VIP member!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!
