Hi Guys

But the moderators there are hard ass. They don't put up with much shit. Shit that flys here won't pass the smell test there.
I doubt that the post you're referring to will EVER be taken down.  
Post the disclaimer and hope for the best and just ignore the gawdy calls....Good Luck

I wouldn't be surprised if this post here is removed soon but in the hopes it remains.... please email me.  

it attracts mostly low-end mongers.  BBFS is one of the specialties there and the members are obsessed with it.  Its a lose-lose for providers.  If you give a guy BBFS and wanted to stay UTR, forget it.  You will be outed so fast it will make your head spin.  If you refuse BBFS, many posters will put up a retaliatory post saying they received it, simply because you refused their request.  This happens almost weekly on the LA board, but most of the girls give up after the management push back like you described, so you don't hear about a lot of it until another poster said he saw the same girl and she DOES NOT offer BBFS.  Of course, then the first guy with the fake BBFS claim says its YMMV.  There have been many times when providers have tried to correct the record and the censorship policies by management requires a Herculean effort by the provider to get it corrected.  The guy that runs the boards is a complete asshole.  

It’s worse than that.  The guys on there try to flig their shit on other boards.  BB is out there now.  I get it.  But why do they destroy a good thing by posting it?  I’ve reach a level of intamecy with a few ladies, but never have I betrayed that trust.  I hate the locker room jock slapping.

I'm not going to search for or look at the site just yet, but ... Do they have copies of your ads from other sites? With your pics?  
.
Search both General AND Newbie for "Takedown Notice" or "DMCA Takedown Notice" (and maybe "Take Down Notice"?).  If the criteria are there, you can do everything yourself w/o having to hire a lawyer.  If they do not comply to a legit Notice, their ISP will totally cut them off from the internet.  
.
As I recall, your photos do not need to show "copyright" on them; they do not need to be officially copyrighted with the US copyright office; but you have to be able to prove that they are "you."  That's another reason for Providers to watermark their photos.  "Adeline Dare" watermarked across your butt pretty much proves the photos are YOURS!  
.
See also Newbie and General threads on "watermarking."  Do NOT put the watermark across your butt. A little lower or a little higher is preferred.  
.
Good luck!

This is what i emailed him today:

Thanks for sharing that!
xoxo
KT

Excuse me? BB is a good thing? Are you serious? Yikes!

She’s asking about a review that mentions BB, not stolen pics.

Obviously you have at least one client who follows the site. He likely posts there too. His rebuttal of supposed bbfs from you will be stronger than yours.  
Unfortunately, otherwise, you can't unring the bell.  

And let it run its course.  Bad stuff happens here., occasionally.  Don’t give the fire any oxygen, and it will extinguish itself.  I know it tuff to say that’s not me, but your real clients know who you are, and you don’t want the others anyway.

Is older than ter, I think. It's a monger-oriented site. There are a lot of mongers specifically looking for bb. Many look for creampies. A lot of them post pics too.  

IF they have any of her personal, proprietary data (photos; "copyrighted" text taken from her website ads; etc.), she can order that the proprietary info be taken down. The website might tell her to take a flying leap, but ISPs take DMCA seriously and shut them down if they do not comply.
.
If any TER reviews have been copied there, TER can step in, too. If, after all that, the site wants to keep a disembodied review, they can still do so. ... Although, she might be able to sue them for libel but that will be much more costly (time, money, public disclosure of court documents) than a DMCA Takedown Notice.

That guy is not even a senior member and has only 16 posts. The hard core guys on that site would not be too quick to believe him. They will believe him even less now with your disclaimer on his post. They would be wasting their money and time if they are that gullible. Your regular client is too gullible.
.
Admin won't take that post down no matter what you say. Having your disclaimer is enough to discredit that guy. You can also ask your regular clients to confirm you always use cover to make your case stronger.
.
You can try to take a stronger stance. State on your ad that you always use cover and that you will blacklist people for even asking for it. You can also use #nobbfs on Switter.
.
Best of luck and stay strong. Some people will always have doubt in their head. You can't do anything about that.

Is that there has always been BBFS between SOME providers and SOME of their customers, but it was always UTR and  a taboo subject to discuss on boards like this.  However, a few years ago, it has become the norm for a significant number, but still a clear minority, of providers to advertise bareback sex as available on their regular menu, often at an upcharge.  Look for acronyms BBFS or PSE in the ads.  So yes, many customers consider BBFS between themselves and a long-term regular who does NOT advertise BBFS or have it on her regular menu an acceptable risk. Risk tolerance is a personal choice, so each monger has to decide what level of risk he/she can live with.  I'm not judging for or against, because I understand both sides of the question, just providing info.  

Fortunately, I haven't had anyone claiming I do BBFS on that site (or to my knowledge, anywhere else) but there have been multiple inaccuracies about me posted there.   However, what's generally said about me there is GPS, which I personally find hilarious.  

You said, "BB is out there now.  I get it.  But why do they destroy a good by posting it." A good thing? really?

if anyone does contact you just ask first from what site they used.  if that one,  make clear upfront that the guy will have a great time and you are very pampering BUT  obviously the guy who posted BBFS confused you with another girl he must have seen.        less aggressive than just blurting out i dont do ..  XYZ  

Similar experience in Vegas. The forums are rife with bbfs and streetwalker topics. I don't find it helpful. If anything I feel disinclined to see ladies who are discussed/reviewed on that site. Some of the most prominent forum contributors also occasionally post on TER under the same or similar screen name about Vegas KGirls, but I'm inclined not to trust their reviews or see the agencies or ladies they review. I don't see them in our forums.

Of course it is. One of the best known KGirl agencies in Vegas openly offers bbfs for most if not all of its ladies. It's even discussed in many of their ladies' reviews on this site. Not saying it's a good thing (it's not), but it's definitely out there.

Most of Vegas kgirl info on those forums, just as on LA forums, is pretty accurate (shills and advertisers aside, of course)  

and playing the same part of your record over and over.  You should have it checked out.  Lol

My needle is working just fine. If it struck your nerve, not really my problem.

You won't see a lady who is simply "discussed" in the BBFS forum when nobody said she did BBFS? Do you also believe some random guy there when he "reviewed" a lady as allowing BBFS?
.
I feel sorry for ladies like Adeline if that's the case.
.
One of the reasons to lie about getting BBFS is to have more BBFS hounds coming to pressure a lady while driving away her safe clients. The hope is that she will succumb when she loses too many businesses or when she is battered down by too many BBFS demands. This was why I advised Adeline to take a stronger stance if she feels the need.
.
As of now, Adeline's disclaimer should be enough. Kudos to Adeline for doing that. Those guys will have to think twice if they knew a provider is reading that forum. There are two other guys confirming Adeline  is NOT BBFS. Other guys can still try to lie about Adeline but that would be pointless now.

As for TER stepping in on stolen reviews doubt that it will happen
Another site has many of mine from here using this handle and three others that are not mine using this handle which I could not get on that site. To my knowledge they never made an effort to get rid of any of the “scraped” reviews from here .

90% of the KGirl info on that site focuses on the ladies at CLL which specializes in bbfs and doesn’t interest me.  Much less on VAC, GFLV, or Little Tokyo. Personally I don’t find those reviews dependable based upon the way they’re written. Just my $0.02. I’m happy that they are of benefit to you.

Sorry to hear that. As others have already stated, that particular board attracts a rather specific type of clientele. I know it’s easy to say this as I’m not in your shoes, but I would frankly just ignore it. As the saying goes..”never argue with an idiot, they drag you down to their level and beat you with experience...”  most moderators (especially on that site) will view it as a he said, she said and you probably won’t get it removed. You probably already do some light screening for newer clients which will give you the opportunity to understand what source any new client found you from so you will be able to screen out those types of requests. Most experienced hobbyists will automatically assume that particular activity isn’t on the menu, especially for a newer client. Most experienced clients will also assume that just because it was posted in a single review, that it’s not a standard activity. If you have 30 reviews and they all said it, maybe that’s different. Probably not worth the brain damage you would go through to most likely end up in the same place.

I don’t know Adeline, but I believe her. The ladies discussed in the Vegas bareback and Kgirl threads on that other site openly advertise PSE/bbfs. Also, the agency in question seems to be pretty high volume. So as to them I choose not to partake. I made no reference to Adeline or ladies like her who are falsely accused of offering bbfs.

just getting boring hearing the same old rant.  You must think the people here are too stupid to remember you already said this 50 times.

I'm pretty sure this was my first time directly comparing posts on the "std board" and on here.

you "don't have a horse in the race" when your "mission" here from day one has been to convince people that YOU look out for fellow mongers while the majority of mongers here take the "side" of the providers or orgs over their fellow mongers.  Its a false narrative to claim there are "two sides."  In reality, most of the time, the interests of your two "sides" are the same.  Reviews drive business to the ladies.  Writing a review is going to help the lady and at the same time shows mongers what a session with a particular lady is going to be like, so he will make an informed decision about seeing her.  Whole many reviews have scant details, they may still have some substantive info that can corroborate statements made in more comprehensive reviews.   Its a win-win.  In YOUR world, ONE side is the winner and the other is the loser.  News flash . . . .  You CAN have it both ways.  The same thing applies to discussion board commentary.  TER is the grande dame of review sites.  Everything else is a wannabe by comparison.

Raise you rate 50 dollars and you'll eliminate 99% of people on that board. Heck, I'm guessing you're out of the range of most of the guys on that board. They're all about the $20 BJ and $80 BBFS, so you know what kind of girls they are seeing. And to be honest, if they are playing in that world, you don't want them as clients.

To chase down copied reviews. One person, stole my TER handle and quite a few of my reviews and posted them. On top of that this person created other reviews using my handle...I bitched but nothing ever came of it so it is what it is,
And I don't see where legally if TER can do anything.

You wrote all that, not even understanding the race I was talking about was ter board VS "std board". I am able to compare and contrast the situations on both boards and I have little reason to say one or other site is "better".

I didn't know you meant ladies who openly advertise PSE/BBFS.
.
I have seen one too many mongers believing in BBFS guys. One even asked on that site if anyone had BBFS with his regular so he would stop seeing her. I think of those mongers the same way as those who think "Guilty until Proven Innocent". It's as if they never heard of the phrase "Talk is cheap".
.
BBFS seekers need result. When one is not a BBFS seeker one cannot truly know about the results.

That site & fourms do attract the low end of hobbyists... I'm so sorry you are going through that & not surprised! But to be fair those hobbyists HAVE talked a few more well known providers into BBFS & know they are more inclined to do it becuase the "cat is out of the bag" which is mind blowing! Hinted to a well known pornstar who provides that they put that out there about her & her reaction confirmed these low end mongers know how to sleaze their way into it!

It really irks me when someone puts in a review something you don't do. For instance, my last review, i dont allow cim but there it is saying I do. And I am sorry to say it happens here alot. And they may be a good review but I still don't want it. You guys don't realize that saying something untrue is dangerous for us. Or maybe you think it's not a big deal but you aren't the one alone in a room w a guy who read something false and now he feels he's entitled cuz he paid for it.  
It is a sad,sad man that has to make up bs about what goes on. That's assuming the reviewer actually saw the gal. Many don't and they just make up reviews for free vip. How about we get free vip for outing those liars. I think it is a stupid policy to give free vip.  Everyone should have to pay. Or give for discussion board posts.  
Sorry A, I got off track. Hang in there. I still have average for my tits and ask anyone, they are not average. Lol.

Actually they don't let you respond to posts so if they are letting her post a disclaimer on the site she is dang lucky. Over the years I have known a few gals who were VERY misrepresented by that site and when they tried to register and reply were banned.  There is no recourse as far as I know.

You used anecdotal evidence to say that one must ALWAYS trust the provider in these situations? Huh ?
It doesn't work like that.

When it comes to services the provider is the final word. It may be true the client isn't lying, but all sessions are a your milage may very situation. So his word on what she offers may be inaccurate even if honest. And let's be honest fake reviews are hardly rare. Yes, providers do lie, but if she says a service is of the table, you best believe her on it or you will more often then not be disappointed. The provider sets her menu not her clients.

In addition to the whole YMMV as the provider will decide if they will offer the same to all comers is the whole question of confidentiality of non-public information. If the provider does not want certain services she provides to be public then people should keep their mouth shut.  

I don't really get your point. I agree that provider has the right to dispute a post on the forum as not accurate. That's what the op did and in this case, the said forum did the right thing.  

As for BBFS, I just assume everyone is bare backing someone. It may not be in this world but a SO or a friends with benefits or maybe other clients/providers. And those people come ld be bare backing others. In fact if a client or provider in bare backing you in this game they are bare backing others, that are also bare backing others.