TER General Board

COVID and the Hobby, Some relevant statistics to put your actual risk in perspective.
GaGambler 5006 reads
posted
1 / 55

Now of course "some" of you, especially the very old, very fat, diabetic, or otherwise "at risk" really should be terrified of COVID because COVID really can be a death sentence to anyone with those underlying conditions, but what about the rest of us, is the virus really that scary? Here's a link that on the surface looks VERY scary, but look a little closer and you might have a change of heart, if you think rationally of course, instead of buying into the media hype that we are all going to die if we don't all hide in our basements waiting for a vaccine to save the day.

 
I am sure you are all familiar with "worldometers" it's one of the most quoted source for statistics regarding COVID, and it clearly states that the US has well over 6 million cases and that we are closing in on 200,000 deaths, some very scary numbers indeed I am sure you will agree, but to put things in perspective look at lines 66 and 67 on the attached link, they tell the true story about your chances of dying if you just look a bit closer and use a bit of common sense.

 
Line 66 tallies the number of cases in the US Military, 55,147 as of this writing. Now if you look at line 67 it shows a very similar number of cases among VA members at 52,089. So what's my point you might ask? Here is my point, active military members are typically younger and are rarely obese, and are usually in at least "decent shape", members of the Veterans Administration are at the other end of the spectrum and are almost always older, and in much worse health overall. Now look at the death rates. Out of 55,147 documented cases in the US military there have only been 82 deaths. That translates into a 99.8% survival rate, meaning that out of every thousand documented cases less than two people have died. WTF???!!! This is what has everybody terrified and has resulted in virtually the entire world shutting down??? Now for the sake of balance lets look at the death rate for the members of the VA who tend to have a LOT of underlying conditions, out of a slightly smaller number of cases 52,089 there are well over THIRTY times the number of deaths at 2,935 or a death rate of almost 6%, now THAT number is a number to heed if you have an underlying condition/s

 
Here is my point. Hookers tend to be younger and healthier than Johns, if you are a John who is old, fat, diabetic or otherwise at risk, do yourself a favor and stay at home until the all clear signal is given, but PLEASE quit preaching at the rest of us who have a greater risk of dying by a lightning strike than we do of dying of COVID. Even the CDC has put out numbers over the last couple of days that 94% of the COVID deaths were people with underlying conditions which means the actual death count of people who were otherwise healthy who died of COVID nationwide is somewhere UNDER 10,000 people. So PLEASE COVID shamers, go find someone else to shame, until you can disprove my numbers I am just NOT interested in hearing you whine.

 
Lastly, while I am sure many of you know a "hobbyist" who has died of COVID, does ANYONE here know of a single hooker who has died of COVID? I know I sure don't. Yes, a hooker could very well be an asymptomatic carrier and if you are old, fat and/or feeble like many of the old fucks on this board, yes she could give you COVID which might kill you, so PLEASE stay at home, but I implore you to please quit pissing on the parade of the rest of us.

 
Let the flames begin. lol

dantananot 12 Reviews 162 reads
posted
2 / 55

POTUS has probably stopped hobbling for the time being, if he knows what is good for him.  Old, obese, stupid.  Is that the list?

Steve_Trevor 190 reads
posted
3 / 55

Yes, for some groups the death rate is low.  But there’s other negative consequences of COVID-19, such as:

- Many who get it are sick for weeks, even months. These include younger, healthy people.  
- If you test positive, even with few or no symptoms, you have to quarantine. That can throw your life and the lives of your family or others you live with or depend on you into a mess.
- Not everyone is getting 100% of medical expenses related to COVID-19 covered. If you’re one of those people, the expenses could be enormous.  
- (The Biggie) If you get COVID-19 and you don’t die, even if you don’t get seriously ill or have symptoms at all, you can pass the virus on to others. And you can do that while asymptomatic.  And THOSE people could have one of the underlying conditions that make COVID-19 very serious, even deadly.

It boils down to this I think:  if you don’t care whether you get the coronavirus and COVID-19, there’s lots of people who do care about whether they get it. So think about them. That’s the whole premise behind wearing non-N95 masks: it’s not going to protect the wearer all that much (although it can help), it’s really to protect others.  

I know thinking about the welfare of others is a foreign concept to some people, but the more we all do what we can to help each other during this pandemic, the faster we’ll beat this thing, reduce the case loads and deaths, and get the economy and our lives in general closer to what they were.

inicky46 61 Reviews 167 reads
posted
4 / 55

First of all, CaCa several times made it appear he's not old.  But he is. Old enough to be in an at-risk group. Why he chose to imply he's not is beyond me but it taints his entire argument. Here's what the CDC says: "people in their 60s or 70s are, in general, at higher risk for severe illness than people in their 50s." But his greatest stupidity is his incorrect premise that, just because younger people are less likely to die of COVID they don't really need to worry about catching it and should go about their business, hobbying too.
This is irresponsibly obtuse because, first of all, NO ONE YET KNOWS all the after-effects of COVID, even with "mild" cases. One very good example is that of Eduardo Rodriguez, pitcher for the Boston Red Sox. Rodriguez is only 27 and is a HORSE. He came down with a mild case of COVID before the start of summer camp but was cleared to play again on July 18. Then an MRI revealed he had myocarditis, an inflammation of the heart. Now he's out for the season and who knows if there's permanent damage. The attached article says between 10 and 20 percent of people infected come down with myocarditis.
And this is just one example of a side effect that can impact young strong people.
So, once again, CaCa proves the old adage: DON'T TAKE MEDICAL ADVICE FROM PEOPLE ON A FUCK BOARD.
Especially our resident dimwit.

gnubie 2 Reviews 128 reads
posted
5 / 55

I don't really worry about MY actual risk. I worry about the ripple effects. But, am I saying something new?

impposter 49 Reviews 175 reads
posted
6 / 55

Most people know not to stand in the middle of a golf course waving a nine iron over their head during a thunderstorm. Most people know to take shelter during a thunderstorm to decrease their chances of dying from a lightning strike. Others proclaim, "I DEMAND MY RIGHTS! YOU CAN'T STOP ME FROM WAVING THIS GOLF CLUB DURING A THUNDER-ZOTTTTTTTTT!"  
.
Most people know to wear a mask and practice social distancing to decrease their chances of getting infected with COVID-19. Others gather in dense crowds w/o masks and increase their chances of getting hit by COVID "lightning" and suffering the consequences ... and spreading the infection to many others.
.
"Imagine if, in London, during the Blitz, there'd been a whole bunch of people screaming, "I'LL TURN ON MY LIGHTS IF I FEEL LIKE IT!""
.
"Mask not what your country can do for you. Mask what you can do for your country."  
.
"Don't let anyone tell you not to put a fork in an electric outlet. IT'S YOUR RIGHT! More people are killed by the flu, anyway."

Posted By: GaGambler
PLEASE quit preaching at the rest of us who have a greater risk of dying by a lightning strike than we do of dying of COVID.

100ProofOfLV See Agency Profile 114 reads
posted
7 / 55

You are correct to worry about the ripple effects. Some people are too ignorant to do so and think the know it all until they kill themselves or someone else. That's why 1,000 people a day are dying from covid.

-- Modified on 9/1/2020 1:29:34 PM

Brosephine 151 reads
posted
8 / 55

There needs to be a vaccine for TDS.  Good lord.

TennGambler 20 Reviews 126 reads
posted
9 / 55

Covid has everything fucked up; seeing escorts, sports, entertainment including my beloved Vegas, the economy, people's health, travel, education, government spending (Holy Deficient Shit). Well EVERYTHING!

Do your part to stop the spread so we can kill this virus and get back to normal.

Personally, I take 6 pills a day for various health issues ( main cardiac) so I am very careful about my behavior for my own health. No way I would see a provider. Fuck!, I sure am tired of jacking off!

blondiegirlxxxx See my TER Reviews 135 reads
posted
10 / 55

I do know of one provider who was based out of Florida and was on Twitter who died of COVID.  I Can't remember her name off the top of my head.

lester_prairie 12 Reviews 157 reads
posted
11 / 55
36363jensen 4 Reviews 123 reads
posted
12 / 55

It is very unlikely that we will "kill this virus and get back to normal" in your lifetime. Normal will need to be redefined in a world where SARS-CoV-2 exists. I'm not saying what we are living now is the new normal -- cannot be. But people are going to have to live with the fact that new risks have to be factored into their choices.

That will be different things to different people and I suspect over the next few years everyone will reset their baseline "live is dangerous and I will be hurt by something sometime and I will be killed by something something some day" and act accordingly. In many ways that means ignoring the risks (who hides in their house and is afraid to travel in a car or bus? Some but we think those people have some phobias that are not quite normal.) and just doing the things that one thinks make life worth living.

Today most people are in the "figuring that out" stage, even aside from the whole public health policy aspects.

inicky46 61 Reviews 155 reads
posted
13 / 55

Yes, the OP is WRONG on several levels (as I pointed out above) but I also think we'll get back to a new normal that's not THAT different from the old one. Why? Because at some point in the next year there WILL be a vaccine that will protect anyone who takes it. Most likely, that vaccine won't grant us lifetime protection because the virus will mutate. So, just like the flu, we will probably need a new vaccine every year. That's really no big deal because it can be packaged with the annual flu vaccine which, this year, protects against 4 different strains of flu. So.....

Oldtimemonger 136 reads
posted
15 / 55

How do you know a safe and effective vaccine can be developed this soon? Even the biotech guys I've talked to are not that confident . It is possible but it is also possible that the vaccine will be way less than 90% effective or have serious side effects.

The fastest vaccine brought to market was mumps and it took four years. Mumps was not a novel virus.

GaGambler 151 reads
posted
16 / 55

But when has that ever stopped him.

 
We have had a flu shot for decades, and in most years it's effective rate has been dismal.  

 
I would bet money, a LOT of money that we will have a vaccine, or most likely several of them within the next few months, but there is NO WAY to prove a vaccine both safe and effective in such a short time. Side effects may continue to reveal themselves for a decade or even longer.  

 
BTW does ANYONE really believe that the real number of cases in the US is only 6 million cases? That's a tenth of the number of cases of Swine flu and COVID is supposed to be a lot more contagious. Even the CDC admits the true number could easily be ten times higher than the stated number. Stats about COVID are all over the place, but I do find it interesting that while so many people disagreed with my post, citing things I NEVER said, like comments about masks, social distancing etc, but NOBODY disputed my numbers. Go figure., I guess they really don't want to be confused by little things like FACTS.

inicky46 61 Reviews 183 reads
posted
17 / 55

In fact, just this afternoon the CDC announced states should be prepared for a vaccine as early as late October or early November (what a coincidence, just in time for the election). Will it happen? Who knows. But if you've followed the Phase 3 study progress, there are several vaccines that could easily be ready within a year. Your mumps example is from decades ago and the worldwide effort for a COVID vaccine has been unprecedented. So I'll stick with my prediction.
That said, I would certainly NOT be among the first to take the new vaccine but that's a separate issue.

Steve_Trevor 192 reads
posted
18 / 55

The point is, you’ve ignored a lot of other facts about COVID-19 in trying to paint a rosy “what, me worry?” picture of the pandemic.  

Tell you what... why not visit the largest hospital near you and talk with all the COVID-19 patients there (if they’ll let you do it). Tell them all it’s no big deal because they’re not dead. At least not yet. Give the same message to their families if you can, I know they’ll appreciate your positive attitude.

Oldtimemonger 223 reads
posted
19 / 55

I am well aware of the trials. I am well aware they may have a vaccine soon. I only asked how SAFE and EFFECTIVE such a vaccine would be.

You admitted that will NOT be the first to try it. Gee, I wonder why! LOL

I_like_escorts 22 Reviews 175 reads
posted
20 / 55

Posted By: GaGambler

Now of course "some" of you, especially the very old, very fat, diabetic, or otherwise "at risk" really should be terrified of COVID because COVID really can be a death sentence to anyone with those underlying conditions, but what about the rest of us, is the virus really that scary? Here's a link that on the surface looks VERY scary, but look a little closer and you might have a change of heart, if you think rationally of course, instead of buying into the media hype that we are all going to die if we don't all hide in our basements waiting for a vaccine to save the day.  
...
Let the flames begin. lol
No flames from me.  I share your views.  This is basically a flu virus, and affects respective demographic similarly.

I'm in my late 30's.  Far from a whippersnapper I was when I started hobbying, but still holding my own.  The provider I saw in July was young and healthy.  We didn't wear masks.  (Well, I wore one when going in and out of her apartment, to mask (ha!) myself from nosy neighbors.)   We didn't social distance.  (If we did, it'd be an air dance in a strip club, not a hobby session.)  I'm still healthy as a horse---I tested negative not too long ago, and told her that---and I hope she's still healthy too.

Long story short, you don't have to worry about this virus any more than you'd worry about the seasonal flu at Christmas time.  Wash your hands.  Take your vitamins.  Exercise.  Spend time around positive people; it does wonders for your immune system.  Pet a friendly dog.  Don't watch the MSM news.  And maybe avoid a stuffy, crowded rooms, although even /that/ is up to your comfort level.  Unless your immune system is completely shot, you'll be fine.

Oh, and don't hobby if you have symptoms or recently were exposed to Covid.  That's like hobbying when you have cold symptoms: inconsiderate.

Robertini 4 Reviews 156 reads
posted
21 / 55

Sorry but that's the way I talk.
Everybody here knows that's the way I talk.
But in regular language would be like, did she get infected by a hobbyist?

I used to get in trouble at work and school mostly with females by the way i talk. 😆

GaGambler 165 reads
posted
22 / 55

I agree that there will be several vaccines available in just a few short months, but "SAFE and EFFECTIVE" we won't really have any idea until several years have passed. Some people are more afraid of the virus than vaccine that has been rushed to market. Personally, as a gambling man and oddsmaker I see my chances of dying from COVID as almost non existent, while I see my chances of experiencing serious side effects months or even years down the road from a vaccine that was rushed through trials in a panic to get "something" to market as a LOT more risky than the virus itself

 
and yes, our resident hypocrite speaks volumes when he admits that even though he is in an EXTREMELY high risk group, he doesn't want to be one of the first to try it either.  

 
Back to people putting words in your mouth, I find it a bit ironic that most of the people flaming me on this thread aren't disputing ANYTHING I actually said, they are all off on tangents like masks, social distancing etc that I NEVER mentioned in my OP. NOBODY has disputed my numbers that out of over 50,000 cases in the active military which is made up of mainly younger, healthier people, only 82 people have died. Ok let me quote the latest numbers, over 55,000 cases, 84 deaths, not exactly numbers that would terrify a reasonable person in good health. For the record I am 61, but I am in PERFECT health. It's going to take a lot more than this pussy virus that only picks on the old and feeble like Inicky  to kill me. lol

dantananot 12 Reviews 151 reads
posted
23 / 55
coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 113 reads
posted
24 / 55

any hobbling.  Whenever I saw him he walks upright.  Not even a hint of a limp, much less a hobble.  

 
When you said "old, obese, stupid", I just thought you were signing off with your nickname.  

Newto1000 191 reads
posted
25 / 55

The risk of dying from a lightning strike in the U.S. , in any given year, is approximately 1 in 700,000 or 0.00014%.  The number of actual deaths in the U.S. in any given year from lightning strikes is about 26.  As of August, 2020, the number of COVID deaths in the 25-54 age group (safe to hobby) is about 14,000.   The death rates for lightning strikes are not parsed by age group so let's assume 50% occurred in the 25-54 age group.  Therefore, the COVID-19 death risk is at least 1,000 fold greater than being killed by lighting in 2020.  Not trivial.

For the life of me, I can't understand why the OP started this thread.  Everyone knows that the mortality rate for COVID-19 infections is substantially higher in individuals over 70.  You don't need to present military statistics to prove that.  The issue with people hobbying in the 25-54 age group is transmission from asymptomatic carriers to vulnerable individuals and what appears to be a significant level in morbidiity in middle-aged folks that recover from the infection.  Finally, it should be noted that the PRECEPTION of risk is a lot more important to people than the actual risk.  For example, the risk of getting cancer from a given carcinogen in the food supply may be estimated to be extremely low (1 in 10 million) but very few people will eat a contaminated food, irrespective of the risk.  Similarly, the risk for a middle-aged person dying from COVID-19 is low by a lot of individuals don't want to take the risk of hobbying.  That is just how people are wired these days.

Steve_Trevor 161 reads
posted
26 / 55

Say you’re making a dinner for your family or friends in the oven.  It’s time to take it out of the oven. You know there’s almost zero risk of dying if you don’t wear oven mitts. But you put them on anyway.  Why??

- Without the mitts you’ll burn your hands, it’ll be very painful, and it’ll take awhile to recover with greatly reduced use of your hands during that time.
- Decent chance the burns will be severe enough that you’ll need medical attention, which may not be covered fully if at all by insurance.  
- You’ll probably drop the pan on the floor, ruin the dinner, and your family or friends will suffer the consequences (eg PBJ for dinner tonight).

jc316 87 Reviews 125 reads
posted
27 / 55
GaGambler 231 reads
posted
28 / 55

But I will give you credit for couching your words for maximum effect.  

 
and I didn't IGNORE anything, I just put out some statistics that NO ONE has disputed, all I have seen is a bunch of deflection and people correcting me for things I NEVER said.

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 172 reads
posted
29 / 55

that 94% of the death certificates of people who died WITH Covid-19 show additional causes of death.  That means only 6% died FROM Covid.  Consequently, the vast majority of the people that died had pre-existing conditions and were already on their way to the cemetery from the other causes listed on their death certificates.  6% of 180,000 is 1080, far less than the death rate in a normal flu season.  I won't go into the motivations on this board for the chicken-little mentality that has been perpetrated on Americans.  I will save it for P & R, but anyone that is paying attention will figure out the reason for the hoax.

lester_prairie 12 Reviews 108 reads
posted
30 / 55


END OF MESSAGE

Hpygolky 233 Reviews 211 reads
posted
31 / 55

I doubt that you'll have a link to support your claim. And while you're at it, don't forget to attach anything from the NIH, FDA as well. It might help you case.

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 139 reads
posted
32 / 55

By the time I realized the typo, my edit window had expired.  

Hpygolky 233 Reviews 146 reads
posted
33 / 55

But without getting into a political or cultural debate here, I'm still waiting for you to post your sources on the PR board.
There's more to it then how you're explaining it here.You really shouldn't be spreading this false narrative.

36363jensen 4 Reviews 131 reads
posted
34 / 55

Most of the people who die from the flu are dying from cofactors as well, not really the virus.  At the end of the day other than things like accidents or poison more deaths are not just the result of one factor -- the human body is pretty resilient so generally things need to gang up on it to kill it; unless it joins the other team as well.

In that regard influenza and COVID-19 are similar. But SARS-CoV-2 attacks a lot more other areas of the body than the viruses associated with the flu.

KDzblue See my TER Reviews 188 reads
posted
35 / 55

I have been still seeing folks since March but i have become more low volume than prior &  stay home ALOT  wear a mask if out in the public but mostly I order groceries and such in... am practicing transparency with all clients, Mostly I see folks I know well and can have candid conversations with to screen em I take my health seriously and do the same as my gym or dr does before a visit i ask questions i check temp thus  all my due diligence has worked so far ...These days after I have a guest in my home i clean EVERYTHING from sheets to door knobs when i visit folks or do leave my home i shower both before and after, as well as clean and sanitize my car interior... I am doing my best and i value my clients they have been my saving grace for years due to a lay off so only fair i take care of em in all ways i can and sad to say i no longer dfk but so much more fun to have regardless  ya know before this I used to joke the hobby made me an agoraphobic  clean freak now so not a joke  us hobby girls for the most part have to take very good care of ourselves anyway at least my girlfriends that are in this world we all pride ourselves on taking very good care of ourselves we have to that is what true hobbyist guys want  Good Fun Entertainment.... No stress no bs just Good Fun Entertainment

GaGambler 147 reads
posted
36 / 55

When you had COVID, what the fuck were you doing putting on a seatbelt in the first place? Especially, "during the worst of it" if you were that fucking sick, WTF were you doing in a car going ANYWHERE when you were deadly sick with COVID?

 
AND just what makes you such a believer in an unknown and unproven vaccine. Yes, maybe a "safe and effective" vaccine will be available in a few months, some kind of vaccine will almost certainly be on the market before winter, but the definition of "effective" is a paltry 50% effective rate. If COVID is as scary as most people make it out to be, is a vaccine that is only 50% effective really such a panacea?

36363jensen 4 Reviews 123 reads
posted
37 / 55

AND if he had it back in March why would he be signing up for the vaccine. He would already have the antibodies from the infection.

lester_prairie 12 Reviews 102 reads
posted
38 / 55

Let's say that N equals the spread rate of a contagious disease.  If N greater than 1.0, the number of people getting sick increases.  If N = 1.0 then people continue to get sick, but as others recover the number of currently sick people stays the same.  If N is less than 1.0, then the spread eventually dies out.
.
A vaccine that is 50% effective could possibly knock N from greater than one to less than one -- and therefore usher in the end of the outbreak.

lester_prairie 12 Reviews 137 reads
posted
39 / 55

I'll take the vaccine as soon as it comes out.

Black-Panther 140 reads
posted
40 / 55

The antibodies don't last for more than a few months. I'm positive I had it in January/February. I tested in June and showed I did not have it. But, tests are inaccurate and we learned that the antibodies don't stick around. So, I may or may not have had it, but I feel like I did so was tested. Showed up negative, but I'm still skeptical.

GaGambler 129 reads
posted
41 / 55

He too is almost certain he had it back in January, and he also took the test back in June/July, his test came back negative too, but they even told him "after" he took the test and they billed him a couple of hundred bucks that if he had that long ago the antibodies were unlikely to show up in the test. He had paid by credit card so he called Am Ex and cancelled the charge, what a worthless fucking test.

36363jensen 4 Reviews 132 reads
posted
42 / 55

Yes and the way it works is that the immune system has generated the B-cell that have the code to recognize the virus and if encountering it again will quickly start producing more of the antibodies. The high level of antibodies long after the infection was successfully countered would indicate something of a problem.

The low level of the antibodies, as noted, would be hard to identify in the test.

That doesn't change the point about signing up for a vaccine trial. In fact that somewhat of a problem already for some of the vaccines based on other viruses (AD5 for example). Too many people have already been exposed to that and have the antibodies available. Giving a vaccine to stimulate the immune response to produce such antibodies to someone like that will really bias the test results.

The only reasons I would think someone running one of the trials would be interested in testing previously infected people might be if the vaccine was known to be for a different strain of the virus and and strain was known to be unaffected by the prior antibodies. Then they could at least test to see if some type of complication or risk to the patient exists from the new vaccine and the prior immune response.

GaGambler 175 reads
posted
43 / 55

Effectiveness is something rather easy to prove, SAFETY is quite a different matter, potential side effects are going to be unknown for YEARS, it's impossible to PROVE a vaccine is SAFE in a matter of months. I am in no big hurry to be a guinea pig.

 
That said, MILLIONS of people should be much more scared of the virus than the vaccine, anyone with a compromised immune system, who has diabetes, who is morbidly obese, or is elderly, NOT 60's but late 70's and beyond. There are hundreds of millions of people who fall into one or more of these categories and they should be the first to take the vaccine/s. Personally, I am going to take the wait and see approach, besides it wouldn't be fair for me to "cut in line" ahead of people in the very high risk categories.

lester_prairie 12 Reviews 176 reads
posted
44 / 55

"A study published in 2013 using electronic health record databases reviewed health information on over 13 million vaccinated persons and compared causes of death in the vaccinated study population to the general US population. The death rate 1 or 2 months following vaccination was lower than that in the general US population, and the causes of death were similar. This study provides convincing evidence that vaccinations are not associated with an increased risk of death at the population level."

GaGambler 148 reads
posted
45 / 55

The vaccines we all took as kids, and the ones that all kids take today went through YEARS of testing and clinical trials before being deemed SAFE and effective, and were allowed to be administered to the public at large. Regardless of which vaccine is first to market the one thing we will know for sure is that it did NOT go through years of testing before given to the public. Yes, It "might" be safe, but until years go by we won't know for sure.

 
I know you, or at least some here would love to paint me as an antivaxxer, but nothing could be further from the truth, I most definitely have had my measles, mumps, polio and every other vaccination under the sun and anyone who doesn't get those vaccinations or refuses to have their kids vaccinated is a fucking moron, but those vaccinations are PROVEN beyond any shadow of a doubt to be both safe and effective. A vaccine rushed to market in a few short months can't possibly make that same claim.

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 116 reads
posted
46 / 55

announced that there was no longer an increase in the number of people dying BECAUSE if Covid.  The death rates from ALL causes, including Covid, had settled back to normal expected levels.  I think the curve has already been flattened, but the MSM media hysteria continues for political reasons.

lester_prairie 12 Reviews 137 reads
posted
47 / 55

Everyone refers to the 1955 incident when a batch of polio vaccine contained live virus.  51 were paralyzed. 5 died.
.
This is billed as the "worst biological disaster in American history."
.
In 1952 21,000 were paralyzed by polio and 3,145 died.
.
So in fact had they delayed the introduction of the vaccine MORE would have died from the disease than from the "cure."
.
Again and again in medical history, delay has killed more than curative attempts.  

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 112 reads
posted
48 / 55

are correct, but I'm inclined to wait a few months until side effects are fully known.  I have not had any  trouble navigating my life during Covid, so I don't think a few more months would be unbearable, but I AM looking forward to a mask-burning ceremony.  

GaGambler 169 reads
posted
49 / 55

but if you want to use polio as an example, by all means lets do so. Just how long do you think it took from the time they started working on a vaccine until they finally got one approved to be both safe and effective?

 
Let me know after you look up the answer, I'll give you a hint, it was a LOT longer than just a few months after the disease presented itself and started killing people, a LOT longer.

 
and PLEASE don't forget my one caveat, anyone in one or especially more than one of the high risk groups for COVID should be a lot more scared of the virus than the vaccine. I am speaking for myself personally, I have minimal risk from the virus, I am not taking a vaccine that inarguably was rushed to market out of fear of a virus that most likely I will never suffer any ill effects from. Not until it's been FULLY tried, tested and proven to be safe.

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 112 reads
posted
50 / 55

Because alcohol kills the virus instantly.  Lol

-- Modified on 9/8/2020 7:53:04 AM

hammerhead896 56 Reviews 135 reads
posted
51 / 55

Instead of manipulating statistics to justify your position GA why don't you just say what you really mean?

 I ,GA Gambler want everyone here to know that not only do I intend to exchange bodily fluids with whomever I dam well please I also do not care what any of you mongers out there think about it! And just to be clear not only do I not give a fuck whether or not I get Covid-19 from doing so I sure as hell do not care if I give you or anyone else for that matter a possibly life changing disease either knowingly or not!

Now there, this is a lot easier than trying to justify your shit right? You should not be afraid to be straight forward!

Lastly if were going by statistics to justify doing something or not then I would say that going by your reasoning that participating in unprotected sex or "BBFS" is a lot less riskier than "DFK" with a provider as "only" 13,000 deaths per year are attributed to deaths from HIV in the USA each year as compared to the now hundreds of thousands predicted to take place from Covid-19 in less than 12 months time not to mention that the infection rate of HIV is a fraction of that of Covid-19 and still mainly happens within the realm of homosexual men and their are way more and better treatments for a long and fruitful life even if you were to contract HIV as compared to the fact that you can die within a matter of weeks possibly from Covid-19 and though you may say I am wrong I know of way, way less older, fat, white guys getting HIV as compared to Covid-19 whether thru spending time with a Escort or not.

So which one is riskier? "BBFS" or "DFK" with a stranger going by your reasoning? So that you know I will take "BBFS" while wearing a mask and not participating in "DFK" at this time. Just being honest!

Luv, peace, I'm out.

36363jensen 4 Reviews 139 reads
posted
52 / 55

You do realize that wearing the mask gives YOU very little protection but I think it quite noble that you will take actions to minimize infecting a provider with SARS-CoV-2 while doing little to protect her from a list of STDs.

Well done.

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 176 reads
posted
53 / 55

Wow, you sure know how to treat a lady, don't you?  If there's no DFK, wouldn't a sheep do?  Why spend all that money on a woman if all you want is a warm, bare hole to stick your dick in?

hammerhead896 56 Reviews 194 reads
posted
54 / 55

just that I find the risk of sickness and possible death to be less than that from Covid-19 at least at this period of time!

hammerhead896 56 Reviews 216 reads
posted
55 / 55

I actually would rather be with a girl but do each their own!
And as far a wearing the mask the "CDC" does recommend wearing one while engaging in sexual activity with someone whom you do not know or reside with.

Register Now!