It is unfair to compare PYTs to Cougars, and visa-versa.
IMO it would make much more sense and create much less animus and corruption if the "Appearance" scores defined the fidelity of the provider’s photographs.
IE:
1. Not the woman in the photos
2. Far from the truth
3. 10 years & 25+ pounds ago maybe
4. Face/eyes obscured & body doesn’t match
5. Face/eyes obscured but body matches
6. Total Glamour shots using all the tricks
7. Glamorized but realistic
8. Artfully posed but representative
9. Very fair representation
10. What you see is totally what you get
Too further better the system the "descriptions" could be assigned arbitrary numbers rather than a "Value added" number.
IE:
1. Artfully posed but representative
2. Glamorized but realistic
3. Total Glamour shots using all the tricks
4. What you see is totally what you get
5. Not the woman in the photos
6. 10 years & 25+ pounds ago maybe
7. Far from the truth
8. Face/eyes obscured & body doesn’t match
9. Very fair representation
10. Face/eyes obscured but body matches
I'd like to see some number crunching actuary formulate those scores into an aggregate in which to profiteer, inflate or intentionally/malevolently sabotage a particular provider.