Step away from the keyboard and go back to drinking.

Maybe it was pulled because it was phucking stupid.

Of course your denial will have you believe otherwise.
Nice.

and you are one post away from being moderated.

Linking to or promoting other "review sites" is against the rules.

since you apparently don't know the rules, consider yourself moderated until you learn them.

I was quite clear in what I said and I have no intention of debating the issue.


Encouraging other to promote other review sites will get you moderated every time, arguing about it will keep you moderated. Your choice.

This is my final word on the subject and since I won't be approving any more of your posts on this thread, it looks like it is your final word as well.

Everyone else here seems to be able to abide by the rules, the thread stands, but your contributions are done on this thread.

I got all exited today as one who was lost, was found and got a new review.  After reading it and looking at it was probably older than mine.  Do you wait for what to post?

How long do you wait to post your reviews on average? Was the point!!!

So criticism of the review process is not allowed? I've been a member here for a several years, like what this board offers but think this is a problem area which needs to be addressed. The moderators here seem responsible and concerned. It's the people who approve/unapprove reviews who are failing. I'm not alone. There have been other threads posted on this subject.

If there are reasons for it, I would welcome your input.

My post was pulled because I dared to question the review process and the problems many others have voiced.

Nice.

Which rules are those? I'm not trying to be a smart ass here, I'm looking for feedback.

how many times are you at McDonalds and see a Burger King add.  We all know there are imperfections learn to live with them or leave them just like a wife or titty dancer.

I respectfully disagree that I "linked" to other sites. I simply asked a question and invited people to PM me in the context of complaining about the broken review process here. I even said administration was responsive to the review problems giving them props when problems were brought to their attention. I don't think the administration or moderators are anything other than reasonable and responsive in my experience.

And yes, I fully understand this is a "for profit" website. I pay dues and submit reviews to earn my place here.

about three hours later.  I find that if I don't do them within a day or two I start forgetting details.

It sounds to me like you are asking how long do I take before writing and submitting a review. Usually no more than a week. I like to do it very soon after the session.

TER has never taken more than 8 days before approving and "posting" a review of mine if that was the question.

that is a new review.  I like to write while it is fresh in my mind. One because I might confuse the girls if I wait too long and 2 because there is only one thing shorter than my dick and that’s my memory.

I prefer incall, and on a good day, I've forgotten half of what went on before I get to my car.

...after the date,(when I could review) the next day i would write in bullet points (hilights) of the date in Word & save it. Then maybe up to a couple/3 weeks later, I would write the full review in Word, copy & paste it to the review form & submit.

OK, let's just say the process of having a review posted takes some time.  It is what it is.  But, I must admit that I am amazed at the number of threads that show up all over the place complaining about "my review took x number of days to appear".

The basic question in my mind is, "why does it matter"?  In fact, why does it matter so much that folks find it necessary to generate threads to complain about it?  I mean it's not like you're gonna get paid a salary when it appears.  You're not getting laid because of it.  What's the big deal.  Eventually, it will show up or else you'll be informed it was rejected for whatever reason.  And if whatever you had to say in the review is deemed so critical to the health of the world, you can always post a "mini" review on your local board.  I just don't get it, but maybe my brain is dead.

My post was not about the review process.  It was trying to determine why someone waits so long to post a review.  On my local board a review just was posted on a provider that has been gone from the business for well over a month.  It got my hopes up that she was back but when I checked, it was a review from before she left.  I have a hard time remembering what I did yesterday let alone over a month ago.  I have seen Guys save up and post 3 months worth of reviews at once.  I think that if your not going to post in a reasonable time frame it makes the review less helpful to others.  I would have not seen a provider , If some posts where made a few days earlier saving me time and money. That is why I like fresh reviews.

save the incrininating data in a private place.   I'll probably go over it once or twice more before submitting.  I don't imagine I'd wait over a week to submitt.  
A review might be held by TER if the reviewer / provider is new, waiting for corroborating data.
skb

It took me years to get it right because 2 out of ten posted.
I'm not a pro but I am honest. I have one pending .I have to
edit and correct mistakes add  ad links and I
never remember the # I dont save  that stuff
or email. Matter of fact I dont even know if my recent one will post
because I cant put in more than the area code for h e
number This year it took me days .Years before.....it took years.