When a gentleman contacts you for the first time, does the number of reviews he has posted give you pause? In other words, if he has over 150 from reputable providers are you were more willing to meet him?
For me it's more the communication and how he presents himself to me. You can be #1 on the list of top reviewers and still be a dick.
A nice introduction coupled with your p411 info or a couple of reputable provider references makes me happy.
Thatβs why you are well liked and respected in Boston. Talking with you makes my time with you so special.
Wait 'til our next date baby π
rehearse this? Seems a little syrupy to have flowed so naturally. Or maybe you're just a couple of romantics.
Erin brings that out in all of us!
Really.
It's going to be one to remember π
Wouldn't miss it for the world!!!!
(Besides, it's always a party with the two of you.)
That's how we roll in the Bean π
I've never been called syrupy before. I kind of like it. Beats douchey Yes? π
That is, the volume of reviews he's posted don't factor into it.
One of my more recent reviewers has written 500+ but that had nothing to do with why I met him. Actually, I'd known him from years back but that also had little to do with my decision.
Nope, he contacted me via P411 and immediately provided all the screening info I require plus more that wasn't even necessary.
THAT is how it's done, and clearly his experience has served him well. 
Is he a hard to please kinda guy? Does he score in the 6,7's. Will you have to jump through hoops to please him?
Opps......you were looking for ladies to chime in, well they won't really tell you the truth.
It's not the number of reviews, it's the numbers in the reviews and what they might mean...
Who would want to see an impossible to please, over-critical, self-centered, misogynistic, low-scoring douchnugget?
It's literally the same advice as is given to everyone: It is not the number of reviews, it is what they say that matters.
It sounds like you've got thinks backwards. Your reviews are "about" providers, your white lists are "from" providers.
150 reviews all with scores in the sub 7 range, written about providers in the sub $150 hr price point would most likely get you on most reputable ladies DNS list. As the saying goes, "it's not quantity, it' quality" that counts.
if he has many. I'm not into meeting a lot of new faces. I'm weary of those who meet someone new every week/month as they probably aren't into repeats. Feel free to tell me how untrue or unfair that is or that I'm full of shit and won't turn down money. Β―\_(γ)_/Β―
I haven't written even a single review, but I am by any metric a "high volume" client. It wasn't long ago that I tried to see at least one or two "new" girls a week, but that didn't stop me from having favorites that I would see every week, or at least a couple of times a month.
I honestly don't know why people, men and women alike, will agree that having sex daily is not an abnormal amount of sex for a man who is healthy and a normal libido, but everyone seems to think that if a person who chooses to NOT be in a relationship, but still wants to have sex everyday is abnormal for filling his sex needs/wants by paying for it. Is it that hard to conceive that a guy might want to have a couple of regulars he sees every week or more, but additionally likes to see a new girl every few days?
When I tell people, even people here that I am single, but that I still get laid "most days" they look at me like I have three heads, I just don't understand it.
At least, that's my guess as to the reactions from other hobbyists.
It's not that you're a man-whore, it's the amount of money you spend BEING a man-whore lol.
I can blow an entire years worth of pussy money in a few bad hours at the card table. Or how about the guys who race cars, raise horses, fly planes??? All of those hobbies cost a hell of a lot more than seeing a hooker every day or two.
I am hardly rich, but I have no wife to support, no kids wanting to go to Ivy League colleges, I don't have a coke habit, and whatever it is I spend getting laid, it's got to be MUCH MUCH MUCH cheaper than getting married/divorced again, not to mention a hell of a lot more fun.
Now I will concede 5-10 years ago I "might" have been just a bit excessive, I will concede that fucking a dozen different girls in a single weekend once or twice a month probably falls outside of "normal" range, but now that I am old, my appetite has waned considerably. lol
You sound like fun! LOL
We were founded by people who thought the Church of England was too scandalous. So.. yea. Sex is bad, mmmk?
I think it's a combination of a few things but definitely wouldn't be the review volume he had specifically. It's a good tool to access but not something that would hold more weight over my other screening checks. Also, it would be important what his reviews were like.. if he more than often rates girls badly and seems extremely picky it might make me warier.
In a word, no
As I don't have VIP I also don't read reviews so the content wouldn't mean anything to me either.
The style, approach and content of his email is where my judgment kicks in...plus his references
When a gentleman contacts you for the first time, does the number of reviews he has posted give you pause? In other words, if he has over 150 from reputable providers are you were more willing to meet him?
Most of the time they read like erotica novel and I am not into that kind of literature...
My date rarely writes review anyway so I would presume a volume reviewer would not be into a very very low volume lady like me so our path won't cross?
The references and the way the gent writes is more important to me...
I don't even know the guys board handle and almost everyone books by email not by ter pm. Even if so I don't have VIP not sure if I can see the list of reviews.
If anything it makes me more hesitant. I've met some great guys here don't get me wrong but I don't see many hardcore "hobbyists" and the times when I knew that the guy was big into reviews and had a lot of them I've noticed that the time together does not feel organic and like maybe they are reviewing me in their head as we are going LOL
But no it doesn't make me feel more comfortable seeing them.
Someone writing more reviews doesn't make them more likely to pass my screening than some who has written a few or none. What I look out for when it comes to reviews is what someone chooses to write.
I understand that a client may have lukewarm or even unfavorable sessions every once in a while. But a high percentage of negative reviews written or clients who are addicted to including hateful, misogynist language in reviews give me pause. So in a way I do screen based on reviews written. It's only fair that if some clients opt to write antagonistic revenge reviews with the hopes of negatively impacting companions, they understand that some may filter them out based on that.
I will admit if I saw 150+ reviews from a requested suitor, it would give me pause. My initial thoughts are - He will have very high expectations given his amount of experience, I love a challenge to be my best self! AND it also makes me feel a tad like the unpopular girl in high school who just got asked to prom by the captain of the football team "He choose me!"
Ginger
Than just the number of reviews, at least for me. I will read some of the client's reviews to get an idea of how the sessions went, gauge their wants and likes and how compatible we might be based on those things. Ultimately though the decision on whether or not to see a client is based on being able to verify them and how they present themself. Being a gentleman, respectful and well spoken goes a long way in making me comfortable and wanting to meet.
most importantly if he has been blacklisted i dont even bother to find out...straight denied. If his info checks out to be good and uses his employment because he another provider does not want to verify him then yes i'll accept. Or if a provider says he is good but i find out that he has been blacklisted or already on my blocklist then nope...deny. Most importantly i listen to my thoughts...if im having a bad feeling then nope...so far its been great
It's not a process of screening for me. You can have hundreds of reviews but who knows if it's real or not. The blacklists sites are more important.
Works both ways, would you reconsider seeing a provider if she had excessive reviews? Some complain there aren't enough, others want more. I once declined a client because he had more than 60 reviews posted. Thankful for his determination to see me, I reconsidered a meet and greet and he's been a loyal repeat. I prefer to ask the references if they'd repeat to determine if I would give an initial session.
the number of reviews a guy has posted does not make me pause.If he has alot or none does not make a difference to me.The content of what he writes in a review would be more important than the number of reviews.
I see guys who do not write reviews and some who do but having alot of reviews does not mean necessarily I would be more willing to see him.
The number of reviews to me is means a few different things.
If the number of reviews is none, then I take into account that they simply not used to purchase fucking. Or they simply time wasting and I quickly ignore them.
If the number reviews is high, I like to read what they wrote. If we meet then that often helps me understand what I can do to make experience best I can for them.
I also like to see WHO they fucking. I like to get a understanding how realistic they are. I see a review last week. Guy reviews a girl who honestly is my opinion fat and ugly. Not full figure but honest just fat. Has face picture and really I could not get wet for that. He gives her a 6 on looks. He complains in review she is fat and ugly a little. Why if he can see see in advance she is fat and ugly he see her to begin with if he is going to complain she is fat ugly. Does he think she will get skinny and cute between time picture taken and time he sees her? Just not realistic expectation. Providers I think try to post best pictures they can of themself. No guy should expect girl will be better looking than pictures, although some MIGHT be.
I want to see the type girl a guy likes to see if he has many review. I am asian, but I am not like asian supermodel big boobs. If I see a guy that has see many asian providers, all big super perfect boobs, I make sure they know that I am not like that. I remind them I am small boobs, I tell them please look my photos again and make sure I am what they looking for.
For me the number of reviews a guy write means nothing. Its the contact and content of reviews that matters to me.
Christine
through my mind when I'm reading a review where the guy was disappointed, and then look at the provider's ad photos. It makes you wonder what's going through their minds when they look at the ad or the website and why they can't see she is fat. The term "curvy" is often overused in reviews to try to be nice to fat girls. In my own reviews, when I say "slender with a few curves", or "slender with curves in the right places", I'm indicating that she's at least within a few pounds of perfectly proportioned, IMO. Ugly is not something I give a lot of thought to. I'm 58 and mostly see girls in their early 30's to early 40's (I know, WAY too old for GaG), so in the vast majority of my encounters, I am happy with the way a girl's face looks. Only had a few out of hundreds I was repulsed by to the point I didn't enjoy the session as a result.
"Providers I think try to post best pictures they can of themselves. No guy should expect girl will be better looking than pictures, although some MIGHT be. "
I've noticed this in the reverse, where you meet someone in person before you see them in a picture (which would be civies in my case because that scenario has never occurred with an escort) and they just don't look as good in the picture as in real life. Of course these weren't boudoir photos where the photographer threw away the first 1000 and then photoshopped the best one. Because your day to day photos taken by smartphones or small digital cameras tend to capture our faces in mid contortion. Our brains filter out the many contortions in real time and give us the average of what the face looks like, whereas a photo can capture it at an inopportune moment.
That said, the most common photo lie is in regard to weight.
But if he sounds too picky and needy and writes mostly shitty reviews putting down the providers, I won't see him. Most guys who write lots of reviews don't come to see me anyways because I dont offer Gfe and none of the things they want like bbj and kissing. Because they've seen so many girls they are used to getting that and I don't offer it so it won't work out. I'm glad it doesn't though. I play safe and know when I leave this business imma still be clean.
Yep! I made an exception only once to see a gentleman with a few more than usual on my radar. But that's very rare. Most guys I've seen as of late don't write reviews. I'm thinking it's a slow dying breed quite honestly, not sure why, but makes no difference to me.