by making it possible for gents to see NCNS and B&S complaints on a ladies profile

by doing away with the numerical descriptors for appearance in favor of some kind of verification that the pics are real and fair representation

by making it easier for providers to have fake reviews removed

by having a search field for type of website the provider has, so that guys like me who prefer to avoid girls who only have CL or BP or Eros sites can skip their reviews in a search

and probably a few other things but I'll leave it at that LOL

tyvm,P.T.

tired of reading Thank you and Happy birthday posts...can't they just pm the ladies??

although still link to their other reviews

it would remove the "bargain ability" from the review system

and for giggles,  the # of disputed reviews should be displayed by a providers name.

actually to remove the restriction......

.....of not being able to use an ID and an alias on the same thread, especially if it is harmless in nature and just being used to complete a joke etc......

Also, to piss off the numbnuts who don't like aliases to begin with.

You wouldn't know who I am if I posted with a real handle or an alias, so get over it.....

ok, somebody had to say it

actually, it would be nice if staff paid attention to the S&P board. When was the last time anything was changed because of a post there? Seems like a lot of pissing in the wind that only gets read by other members, but not staff.

The most abused as well as abusive facet in the reviews is the "Appearance" scoring. Replace this wholly subjective category with one with easily definable standards and precepts.

(Example)

1. Not the woman in the photos

2. Far from the truth

3. 10 years & 25+ pounds ago maybe

4. Face/eyes obscured & body doesn’t match

5. Face/eyes obscured but body matches

6. Total Glamour shots using all the tricks

7. Glamorized but realistic

8. Artfully posed but representative

9. Very fair representation

10. What you see is totally what you get

 No longer would the 'score' have the value; but rather the score's definition. Both shameless shilling as well as scoring sabotage would be curtailed.

When writing a review, we have to fill out a new profile.  Yet, the only profile that shows is the one filled out by the very first reviewer.  

Profile pages can get old and need updating for a number of reasons.  Ladies get breast implants, they change their hair color, certain services may be offered that were not before.  And, nobody likes to admit it, but the ladies (like all of us) do get older.  

What should happen is that a provider's review page will have her name, her contact phone number and/or e-mail address, the link(s) to her ad or web site address(es), and her TER i.d. number.  The list of her reviews will follow.  When you click on the review, in addition to the text of the review, the new profile page opens up.

That's what I would do.

and make them more user friendly.
The complaints by hobbyists are the same over and over, year after year.
I don't think I need to get into each issue, as TER has to already be aware.

Allow for subsequent reviews of the same lady to be appended to the original review

This way someone can tell if the dates get better with repeating, or if you quickly become a 'number'. (Understanding we are in P4P, but some like to really market the GFE hard so having repeat reviews would help those looking for more accomplishment/connection in that area to identify ladies with that skill.)

Men who submit a blatantly fake review should be banned.

Providers are asked to submit proof when we suspect a fake review. Once the review is confirmed as fake, the guy should be tossed off the site.