I was recently unfairly attacked by a reviewer and TER is siding with him. I've sent plain verification selfies and urged admins to compare with the abundance of photos I have posted on my website.
Looking at the enclosed picture, would you agree that quote "She is over 50 years old, contrary to her website....a woman of certain age with wrinkles on face, elbows and on few other places, although session was fine. She is several decades older, her pictures aren't even in same zip code." Please, I would appreciate as many replies as possible to help moderators see public opinion. Your voice matters. The goal on this platform is to promote accurate information and transparency, not to breed toxicity and pollute it by using inflammatory language created with intent to purposely hurt a provider. Being unkind, rude and condescending to someone is never the answer. With grace and honor,xxo
Alexandrea Belle
Here is my verification selfie sent to TER.
TER sides with the reviewer.
I was recently unfairly attacked by a reviewer and TER is siding with him. I've sent plain verification selfies and urged admins to compare with the abundance of photos I have posted on my website.
Looking at the enclosed picture, would you agree that quote "She is over 50 years old, contrary to her website....a woman of certain age with wrinkles on face, elbows and on few other places, although session was fine. She is several decades older, her pictures aren't even in same zip code."
Please, I would appreciate as many replies as possible to help moderators see public opinion. Your voice matters.
The goal on this platform is to promote accurate information and transparency, not to breed toxicity and pollute it by using inflammatory language created with intent to purposely hurt a provider.
Being unkind, rude and condescending to someone is never the answer.
With grace and honor,
xxo
Alexandrea Belle
If I were the TER admins I would not consider this sufficient proof or anything. You've got on bad review so just let it go. Making a big deal here -- even if the person was rude/spiteful -- doesn't really help your case.
While I would not ask you post here you could easily resolve the age issue by providing TER a redacted copy of some official ID, drivers license or something, that clearly shows your face and date of birth. Then they will know and can make an informed decision on your complaint.
I also agree with the other post. If you're stating you have a no review policy you should not have any reviews on TER at all and should be asking ALL reviews be removed along with your profile. Not doing so seem a bit disingenuous.
As a hobbyist, the issue for me is analyzing reviews to determine who I may be seeing (Appearance) and what activities (Performance) we have in common.
When I see a provider with 30 reviews who consistently has "10's" and "9's" in "Appearance" and then one very low score of "5" in "Appearance" my instinct has been, that has often been confirmed, is that the hobbyist is not accurate for a variety of reasons. Some reasons include anger at the provider for whatever reason. Another is simply that the hobbyist is a low scorer.
The outlier score IMO is unfair to the provider. What should be done? The provider, as I have told a number of providers, should ignore one bad review/reviewer.
Another is for TER to take the initiative to ask the reviewer why his review is so diametrically opposed to 30 reviewers.
We are asked to justify high scores for performance.
A reviewer should have to justify an extreme aberration of a review or have it removed.
All JMHO
I thought he articulated his justification quite clearly. That's what the OP appears to have an issue with.
One review out of 31 says she's a "5" in appearance. The other 30 have consistent "10's" and "9s"
You are okay with that??
Not speaking for john but yes. Unless this was an obvious case of trying to extort some special services or I'll give a bad review -- clearly that was not the complaint -- then he certainly has the right to his opinion. As does everyone reading his review.
I'd also note that there have been cases where some provider had stellar reviews and then one really bad report in the discussion boards, then a couple of bar reviews -- rip off -- came out. Later she was banned, well that's inferring so not a fact, and her reviews and profile all removed from TER.
As an outsider looking in I don't think most of us have much to say other than how we're reacting to the general situation. Certainly cannot say that any of the reviews are some objective truths.
How do you explain 30, I repeat 30, reviews that are all 10's and 9's for appearance??
Who needs glasses?
The 30 reviewers or the one outlier??
He didn't find her attractive. He thought she was much older than advertised. End of story.
I have no need to explain any of that. You have an outlier in the opinion on age and unless you've actually see the woman you cannot say anything about that question. The other reviews don't provide any definitive answer to any one persons opinion on the looks or perceived age.
So we have an outlier, as I said in my response to the OP -- it is what it is and just ignore it as most of the other opinions are very positive. That does not mean that the opinion is not honestly held (even if rudely stated -- though I'm not reading the review to find out).
I’ve been watching this thread for a while. I just went back and re-read the review in question. While the reviewer might have been harsh in describing OP’s age, he offered many positive thoughts about her performance, giving her 8 out of 10 which is in the ballpark of her prior reviews for performance. If the reviewer was writing out of spite would he have offered so many positive thoughts? I don’t think so. While that doesn’t mean that his assessment of her age is correct, it also doesn’t justify removing the review in my opinion. Especially when one looks at the reviewer’s other reviews which appear to show that he is a tough grader/rater.
.
I also looked carefully at the OP’s photos that she posted in the thread. While they don’t look like a 50 year old to me, I can’t say that they look like a 29 year old either. My guess would be late 30s based on the photos.
.
I also agree with Jensen and many others that the OP should let this go. Her thread really draws attention to the one outlier review in her history. Most of us look for trends in reviews. OP’s are overwhelmingly positive. This thread only serves to highlight her one below average review. In my opinion the review in question won’t harm the OP’s business, but this thread might. If I were her I’d ask Admin to delete the thread and move on.
.
Lastly, I have a question for the OP. Do you remember the reviewer? Did you actually see him? If the answer is “no” then I think Admin should verify from the reviewer that he had proof of the texts he references in the review. If her answer is “yes” then I stand by what I said above.
-- Modified on 1/22/2022 6:42:45 PM
For this very reason, the thread must stay! As it actually tells fellow mongers that if you wanted to offer a dissenting opinion of this provider, you would be singled out and your opinion will be asked to be removed.
This is quite useful information for any monger as it gives insight into what might happen were he to make a similar review!
By saying she should del_ete the thread, you are helping to sweep this rather vital piece of info under the rug. No. Let it all hang out. This is why public forums are great.
In my opinion the review in question won’t harm the OP’s business, but this thread might. If I were her I’d ask Admin to delte the thread and move on.
.
-- Modified on 1/24/2022 3:07:13 AM
I could care less whether the thread is removed because I wouldn't see this provider for free based on her pictures. She looks emaciated, almost anorexic, to me. Not my type. My point was that she is the one that started the discussion, and it wound up highlighting the only poor review that she has. Not a very smart move in my opinion.
say things in the heat of the moment that they regret the next day. I generally have a problem with post-pullers, but in the case of a provider that over-reacted in an emotional moment, I think it's a good option. The review will still be there, so I think Rocket's comment about removing useful information if you delete the post would be made moot by the review.
The review does not convey ANY information on how the provider responded/reacted to that review. This thread does, however.
The review does not say she tried to get TER to remove the review or claimed an attk. This thread does.
Therefore, not a moot point at all. On the contrary, it's excellent supplemental information that cannot be found elsewhere, especially in reviews.
So I'm going to save this thread and make sure if it does get delted, to maybe repost it. So that others are aware how this provider responds to reviews she does not find favorable.
Maybe next time someone tries to "overreact" this way, they will remember there's someone who will stand up for mongers right to write an unfavorable review. And the journey from "I was attacked by a review and review site is siding with him" to "I should lead with compassion" would be a much faster one. Just maybe.
just ignore what they've agreed to if they don't like.
Go back and read the terms of service here. TER pretty much orwns the rights to all content placed on TER and certainly the reviews and posts. They also retain the right to decide what will and won't be posted. But you want to tell TER to go fuck itself and will copy this content and then post it back if TER decided it should be removed.
An outstanding demonstration of your high ethics.
Calm down, I'm not telling anyone to fuck themselves.
TER has the right to all data here, correct. And I have a right to post something about the provider if I feel like it, including allusion to her deltd posts that we've all witnessed. The act of her posting isn't magically removed from memory... this isn't a MIB movie. Having a post or thread del-ted doesn't necessarily preclude others talking about that post or thread.
If my post gets delted too, well, so be it. I don't and won't fight TER.
Once again tho, my point was simply that info in this thread is very useful info to mongers and it cannot be found in reviews. That's it.
-- Modified on 1/24/2022 10:03:09 PM
retains the right to decide who can post at all. Posting privileges can be revoked at will. Something to think about before you decide to repost something that TER has decided to delete, IF they decide to delete it at the request of the OP. It would probably just be a 30-day suspension the first time, but that's going to seem like an eternity to someone like you.
I find it funny that you're fixating on what I said about reposting, yet did not even attempt to address my main point about how her reaction to the review is nowhere to be found in actual reviews - which is what you claimed initially. That removing this thread does not lose any information.
Now you guys, after advising the provider to remove the thread, are accusing me of something when I haven't even done anything. Yet you are the ones who are advocating for removing vital information that helps other mongers telling them how providers react to mongers who write reviews that aren't to their benefit.
Why am I not surprised? Oh right... because the same thing happens with agencies! Instead of broadcasting them shitting on mongers who give bad reviews, you are OK with concealing that fact. And in fact concerned about their biz even. Lol.
And then you wonder why - after being more concerned with the providers biz over a monger who was accused by her - I call some of ya'll anti-monger. Lol.
Well I'm not OK with that! Every single provider org or agency who attempts to shit on a monger like that is etching theit name in stone,whether or not their post will remain on TER. Just like on Twitter, you removing a tweet does not mean the world won't hear about it.
out of why March 2020 was the last time you saw a provider that was worth reviewing.
Sometimes people's emotions show a side of them that is not part of their normal business. The reviews will tell any prospective customer what she is like during a session. Those are the things you want to know if you are contemplating seeing her. It seems you just want to find fault with how she is in real life, but you won't be seeing her in real life, if you see her, it will be in a paid session where it's Showtime for a pro like her. In fact, you are probably the one here who has the LEAST chance of seeing her in real life. Lol I would only give this post any significance if I was thinking of seeing her, and she didn't have ANY reviews at all, which is not the case.
Lol at you taking review count as any conclusion. Using your logic can I say the same about Jensen because he also doesn't have recent reviews? Hysterical.
No, it has nothing to do with "real life". A provider going at a monger alias on a forum of a review board because he thought her older in a review, has nothing to do with real life. It is continuation of mongering business relations.
I dont know about you, but I don't like when a provider or agency har_rasses me or any other monger - after all each monger is my brother - about any of reviews. Attempt at discrediting or th_reat of bl for review opinions are serious offenses in this biz and I wont let anyone bully me or my bros around.
I believe if a monger who writes honest reviews knows beforehand one provider gets mad at honest reviews that arent flattering, it's very valuable information. This can and probably will impact any sessions after the first one if she knows who you are. After all, I've given less than flattering reviews and still have gone back sometimes. This information can't be found elsewhere. This is why I am so adamant at calling out bad practices on the kgirl board that hara$s mongers because of their less-than-stellar reviews.
he couldn't receive PM's because he couldn't afford to pay for VIP, so your lack of reviews, which would get you some VIP, militates in the direction that you have not been paying for pussy either. Just connecting the dots.
You give yourself too much credit. Ask for a show of hands here from mongers who feel the way you do about providers and who consider you their "monger-brother." It might prompt some introspection.
Since the majority of the responses here AGREE with the OP that she does not look 50, you have to consider that this reviewer may have some kind of agenda. Maybe he didn't get the off-menu services he wanted, or maybe he was late and she didn't want to go overtime. There are many reasons for a bad review that are not related to looks or service because the goal of the review is NOT to help other customers, but to get revenge on the provider for some perceived slight. Consequently, your assessment that her minor meltdown over an age discrepancy, when virtually all of the responding members here disagree with the reviewer's statement on her age does not make it "valuable information' due to the likelihood that the reviewer was either agenda-driven, or a moron. I would have assumed that anyway after reading it and her other reviews even if she didn't bring it up here, so there is nothing added of value for me by her OP.
I never said I couldn't afford to pay for VIP either. You are wrong, making all kinds of weird assumptions. I may have said my vip lapsed, and that I wasn't in a hurry to renew it. You made up the can't afford part yourself.
I don't really care about yours or anyone else's appeal to majority. Not interested in fallacies.
Aside from a weak appeal to majority (everyone thinks so hence it must be true) , you failed to provide a coherent argument to your claim that this thread doesn't provide anything that the review does already.
And my argument is that it does - it provides a providers response, which is quite significant.
If you look at something as benign as yelp reviews, if I look at reviews, sort by stars and find that every or most non-four star review has a snarky comment from the owner, that certainly would give me a lot more information about the owner that I would get simply from reviews alone. That would also influence if not my willingness to go to a restaurant, but at least my willingness to leave a non-glowing review. Which already impacts the mongering. Same goes for a single comment from owner about the only non-glowing review, if he claims the review "attked" him.
It works both ways too. However, you claiming that nothing in this thread has relevant information that isn't in a review, is simply inaccurate.
What attitude toward providers? I only bite back when I sense mongers are unfairly accused. We had another thread started by a provider in which I thought I was pretty tactful. And that's because the provider was pretty tactful herself and didn't accuse anyone. This is a two way business and mongers are paying for a job and evaluating it on this site. Mongers deserve as much respect as providers, but clearly that isnt the reality.
Last but not least, I don't give myself any credit. I don't really expect reciprocity. If I consider mongers brothers, I don't expect them to do the same to me. It's fine. I'll live.
-- Modified on 1/25/2022 4:32:26 PM
"So I'm going to save this thread and make sure if it does get delted, to maybe repost it. "
Now you want to claim you said something different.
You are correct that the OP as made and everyone who cares will remember it. You're incorrect that it means anything critical that must be preserved for those who might want to read old discussions in the future (How many here when researching a provider actually do searches for their posts on TER?) or hold over someone's head and repost links or quotes from sometime in the future (That we see often enough but it's hardly limited to mongers quoting a providers old post).
It is ONE post from an emotional reaction to one persons statements about her. It's not like it's a pattern of behavior guys need to know about so they don't have a bad session.
You appear to be more excited and worked up about this than the OP -- she's been largely quiet since the OP -- you on the other hand have made some clearly stupid statements you want to walk back and claim were not said. You also seem to want to make a human error in judgement by someone out to be some major lifetime error they must be held accountable for in perpetuity.
As you can see there is a "maybe" there and again, I've yet to do this. You're fixating in what I'd say I might do rather than on what some actually advised to do.
I consider provider or agency reaction to reviews on site that specializes pretty much entirely on reviews, a very important piece for info. When I used to see indies, I used to monitor their entire online presence, including web archive and so forth. You think a prospective customer doesn't want to know the provider will start a shit storm if they were to write a review not to her liking?
"It is ONE post from an emotional reaction to one persons statements about her."
One post is more than enough. The initial reaction, as usual, is the most honest one. The provider classified this review as an attk and also shat on TER for "siding with him".
Im worked up? Damn right I'm worked up. Any time I see a monger treated unfairly I'm worked up. Should know this by now. Especially if a provider got five different white knights polishing her clit. I was pleasantly surprised when you didn't join them - but hey if you wanna do that... It's not too late.
Human error? I'm a simple guy, I'm gonna give the provide the same chances she gave the monger in his first post. Zeee-ro
She could change her name, eat 100 cheeseburgers, get a plastic surgery, and Ill still remember her throwing a tantrum over a dissenting review. And actively remind others of that.
Maybe next time they won't atk mongers over a review they simply didn't like.
Ethics and Felcher Boy are mutually exclusive.
Emaciated, almost anorexic, funny I didn't think she looked that heavy, LOL!
Seriously Badger, look at her upper arms in the photo where she’s holding the sign, and her legs in the photo where she’s sitting. They look like toothpicks. Not very healthy IMO. But given her reviews it looks like many gents like that look. Not me.
-- Modified on 1/25/2022 6:52:09 AM
Seriously, you didn't pick up on the humor in the reply?
Emaciated, almost anorexic, "FUNNY I DIDN'T THINK SHE LOOKED THAT HEAVY", LOL!
Meaning she would have to gain weight to be emaciated or anorexic!
It's been said you can't be too rich or too thin!
Well, at least you can't be too rich!
And I agree with you!
My bad. I guess I got caught up in reading Felcher Boy's bullshit and missed your humor. Apologies.
No sweat, as long as you got a laugh out of it!
No one has to justify anything. Lol. What is this madness? What is this appeal to masses garbage? Again, an outlier review does not have to be justified if a non-outlier review doesnr have to be justified. Just because the majority believes something, doesn't make it true.
A review is a subjective recap. There is no rule that says that if 100 people are well satisfied, then 101st should be as well. Rather, there is no mathematical induction for this one. Moreover, if that 101sr is not satisfied and writes a dissenting opinion, you request review site to question veracity and potentially remove the review? Sounds like you don't want a review site, you want a "consensus circlejerk" site to me.
There’s not much we can do about a persons opinion unless we can prove that we never saw the person and honestly TER doesn’t even care about that anymore. They used to, but they don’t anymore, or at least that has been my personal experience.
Try not to let one person bother you
-- Modified on 1/22/2022 5:02:18 PM
First off, no you don't look like a 50 year old, but what has age have to do with compassion or intimacy? Not much.
have a "no review" policy per your FAQ, how did a new review even get posted? Why are your reviews still currently accessible? Sounds like you delisted to me.
And if you don't want any more reviews and are "stepping away from review communities", why does your website boast about your TER ratings? Why are you posting your complaint here?
As for the age thing, makeup, filters, and photoshop CAN cover up a lot of things.
-- Modified on 1/12/2022 8:50:51 AM
Pics look representative. Profile looks accurate. You don't seem like some of the ladies that are using 10+ year old pics and/or creating a new TER profile (presumably to look younger) vs. adhering to TER rules (it is my understanding that these are rules) and reactivating/combining profiles.
... the last thing you need to do is bring the drama to the boards. And I say this for your own good. Most of the seasoned mongers know how to discount one off reviews, and attribute something as someone's opinion. If you know for sure your age is accurate, don't worry about anything..
I come to Las Vegas at least once a year (used to be more before COVID), and would have loved to see you, if you weren't outside my budget range... lol
You certainly do not look fifty -just hot. See profile claims 20’s and know of a number who trim their age by a few years. That being said twenty plus years is a lot to trim and think would have most guy turning around at the door if true.
Read a number of reviews and do not get any sense of age deception from others.
Wish you luck with TER but not real hopeful- have seen providers not able to get rid of fakes here even when complimentary and scores above average.
an evaluation from the customer's perspective, not the provider's. Like others here, my own opinion of your appearance is antithetical to the review in question. With that said, I see a lot of providers with your slender body type, and yes, many are older than how they appear in their photos, but they ALL take good care of themselves and appear 10-15 younger than they really are. For me, it's the best of both worlds. I get a provider with the experience to rock my world in the bedroom but who looks a lot younger than she really is. One man's hot babe can be another man's OTHFB, but there is no way you could be mistaken for an OTHFB, so shrug it off in the knowledge you still have it when it comes to looks and move on. Factored into 27 reviews, his will not damage your average, and most reasonable customers will see it as an outlier, and not the norm. Take solace in the knowledge that you are the kind of woman most of us would be happy to be seen in public with. I can't say that for many in this biz.
Someone who has never met you cannot speak about you personally.
I can say after 40 years of going to strip clubs and seeing thousands of naked women, that a 21 year old heavy smoker will look older than a healthy living 50 year old.
One example: A girl onstage looked great from a distance. She was slender and I guessed maybe 18-20, in the poor light. When I got close to the stage I got a better look at her face and changed my opinion to 30++. [At this point I recognized the dancer and knew she smoked a lot, like every minute she was off stage]. When she danced close to me under brighter lighting, her skin looked like that of a 70 year old, yuck! All of these opinions of the same girl at different distance/lighting.
If I had to judge your photo I would say:
age does not matter to me
face 9+
hair 9+
body buy that girl a cheeseburger.
it's that the review is not a fake. The meeting actually happened.
Fake reviews sometimes come down (and should always come down, IMO), but real ones stay up - even if they are unkind.
It sucks that this guy's opinion is so unkind towards you.
Kudos to you for calling him out.
And you get the sense that this guy had a hard on, in a bad way about the way the date was scheduled.But I doubt TER will do anything about it so you're going that have to let it slide.Most guys would probably discard that one review anyways, it's what we do. Just hope it isn't a pattern.
Now, being a frequent visitor to Vegas and although we have never met, I know of you and I haven't heard anything of this nature about you from my "homies"...lol
Pictures can be deceiving. Some people look great for their age, others, not so much. The age of the viewer also has a lot to do with the impression of your age.
If you're not nearly as youthful looking in person, I'd be disappointed too.
As others have said, it's just one review.
You have to read reviews knowing that some people are always going to complain. Ever try reading product reviews on Amazon? There is always someone complaining among other stellar reviews.
.
As a shopper i take such into account and discount very high and very low reviews-- the outliers.
Why in the world would you care what one, mindless idiot posted? The ratings on every single one of your other reviews are stellar. Who would you believe if a 5-star hotel received as many 5 star reviews and one "unfair" review on Yelp; the one "unfair" review or the countless stellar reviews?
Anytime a mindless idiot posts a review like the one you reference, that person says more about themselves than they say about you. Clearly this person has a screw loose somewhere and is screaming at the top of his lungs, to the whole world that he is insane. Why get in his way?
Yes it is sad that we have some disgusting people in this world but that should be no surprise. Consider how many people voted for a certain candidate who does nothing but lie and steal money from the American people.
You WILL survive!
... just because he has an opinion that this provider looks 50, is rather baffling.
the village idiot looks totally sane--to other village idiots. Think about it.
So I'm not very fluent in English, but if I read this post correctly you just identified our beloved Little Felcher Boy as the village idiot. Well done.
Are you saying you are the village idiot?
Because the logic of "this provider has stellar rating hence someone who wrote a bad review must be an idiot" is truly so ass-backwards it cannot ever possibly come from a sane person or a non capt-save-a-hoe
OK, there is another possibility - sheep mentality.
" Who would you believe if a 5-star hotel received as many 5 star reviews and one "unfair" review on Yelp; the one "unfair" review or the countless stellar reviews? "
You can believe both, by the way. One guys bad experience is just as good and believable as anyone else's good experience.
What you are doing now is indulging in fallacy of ad populum.
Thank you for proving my point! You agree with the "village idiot" and everyone reading your post realizes as much--EXCEPT YOU!
I did not agree with anyone.
All I've said is calling someone an idiot or other dumb shit for a dissenting OPINION in a subjective review is pathetic and bitchmade.
And once again, you invoke ad populum fallacy. I don't give a shit what the majority or everyone thinks. That's not how it works. I will defend anyone's right to criticize anyone and state their opinion freely. That's what the reviews are for.
But I already see that pussy got you extra dizzy.
Let it go!!
Maybe to him you look 50. I do know women in 50th who do not look much different.
You had very nice reviewers in the past, who were giving you 10 for appearance. Be very grateful for that, way much hotter providers were getting way less. This is how he saw you, and it's OK.
You do yourself great miss service by making a big deal out of it.
In my book you are 6-7 max for appearance and it's OK.
First of all, to anyone who took the time to comment or respond, thank you for your contribution, it is so precious and has definitely helped my case. I’m overwhelmed by the kindness that has been sent my way. This was simply me bringing light to an accusation I felt was inappropriately directed and misleading. It helps when moderators can see what others have to say. It may also serve as a useful post for new members to remember when reading and writing reviews. You can say a lot about me and my appearance. But, placing me in the 50s and ranting about it in such a degrading language in an attempt to smear, is something we should not welcome.
I think a little bit of respect goes a long way and if we can just be a bit more mindful of how we treat each other…and just try to be kind…it can help us reach new highs and connect properly and passionately, reducing anxiety when anxiety for most is understandably higher than normal. Orgasms are one of the few lovely things we’re allowed to have right now..
Thank you again to those who responded... I welcome any and all communication you choose to share with me. Hope this reminds everyone to put their best foot forward and and try to start every day of your life in a positive, hopeful and constructive manner. Having mostly stepped outside of the review community it was disappointing to see that moderators were comfortable publishing such misleading content by a very angry soul. I thought this forum was supposed to guide gentlemen in the right direction when looking for appropriate release.
I wonder what horrible injustice was done to reviewer to feel inclined to speak of me in such poor taste. I guess I should be better and lead with compassion. The pandemic has been such a pressure cooker for everyone. We are all just looking to make sense of an increasingly challenging environment.
So, whatever you are feeling, it’s OK, it’s normal, and it’s going to come… Let it come, look at it, feel it, express it, and then try to let it go.
I firmly believe energy and healing travels through the night sky and you will feel it, I promise, you will.
With kind affection,
xxo
Alexandrea Belle
Someone thinking you look 50 isn't enough grounds for removing or not publishing a review. Please, stop it.
Someone thinking you look 50 isn't an accusation. It's what they think you look like. It's their opinion and they are entitled to it. It's also not a lie so there's nothing to clear your name of.
If you actually had intentions of leading with compassion, you wouldn't make this thread in the first place. You'd just let it go. Not one service, not one good, not one product has a 100% positive review rate. You won't ever please everyone. Even if your name is Mother Theresa.
Yes, respect goes a long way and part of respect is respecting everyone's opinion. Lying and saying a girl is younger than you think she is, isn't respect. It's appeasement. I've had many a woman in amp try to play the "guess my age" game with them. I looked like a noob to them and too young to be a hobbyist. And each time when they asked me to guess their age I looked them straight in the eyes and asked if they wanted the truth. I've been mongering for a decade+ at this point and dated many Asian women.
Each one of them said "yes" to the truth and most of them could not hide the disappointment when I voiced what I think their age was.
The moral of the story is that truth and honesty sometimes can cause good feelings to cease. And you must choose between them. I choose truth and honesty,always. It eliminates bullshit flattering, (honey do I look fat? Well duh) unnecessary white lies and all the other baggage that comes with it. Call it like it is and you won't have to keep track of lies, exaggerations, people to appease, etc.
Just my two cents
I don't remember many, if any, such instances.
Which begs a rhetorical question. If it's about honesty and respect, why is someone who says the provider is much younger than she actually is, treated OK. And why the review of a guy who says provider is older than she is, is considered an "attack"?
Is it because even though both of them are inaccurate, the former actually helps the providers bottom line, and the latter hurts it? Well, then congratulations - you've just witnessed a double standard. Because you can't pick and choose to pick on erroneous reviews only from one side - only when it doesn't benefit you and the number on the dotted line.
-- Modified on 1/17/2022 3:00:22 PM
So far, it has happened 100 percent of the time.
That said, no guy has ever reported a provider being younger than advertised.
Huh?
There are countless such instances. When confronted the guys say oh it was just a incidental mistake of age approximation. Guys putting age 30 for 50 year old providers is not uncommon.
But if they put 50 instead of 30,ie the other way around, suddenly for some reason its an "attack" and a deliberate smear.
It makes no sense. If we decide a certain threshold, surely it extends both ways, +/-. If you can err twenty years below, you can err twenty years above. Lol
Not younger than advertised but I've been told quite a few times that I look younger in person than I look in my photos. My body is athletic but with thick thighs, a round ass and 34 DD breasts so it makes me look a bit older in photos I guess compared to very petite women. Sometimes gentleman are completely surprised at how young I look when they meet me 😁 I have a few reviews about it.
I'm 27 but I have a baby face (it runs in my family) and I get mistaken for a teenager all the time. 3 years ago, I actually had a hotel clerk ask me where my parents where when I wanted to check into a hotel. She was so embarrassed when she saw I was in my mid 20s.
Christie Brinkley is 67, looks much younger and I'd definitely have sex with her!
To OP, wouldn't worry about it, you're stunning.
We have an Asian Japanese Escort who is 69 and looks pretty amazing her name is Koko
Omg
also play in a pearly band on the side? Lol
Is "pearly band" the term for a Pearl Jam cover band?
AFAF
On the one hand, it seems to be about the opinion of a particular reviewer and its correctness. That's a question that cannot be answered because there is no one correct opinion--which is why we call them opinion and not fact. We can settle whether someone is 5' 2" tall or whether my car is goung 100 mph, but but there is no way to settle whether I am "right" or "wrong" that peach cobbler tastes like shit to me. De gustibus non est disputandum.
Or is this about a reviewer using language and striking a tone that was mean-spirited and insensitive and purposely demeaning (acknowledging of course that all those are qualitative judgments and therefore also a matter of opinion). Presuming we can distinguish one from the other, I can certainly understand arguing over that. I've gone out of my way to exercise some restraint in descriptions of women I've met here, although who knows whether the ladies received it that way. I don't see a need to make comments that seem to serve no purpose other than to be hurtful.
But at some point, no matter how thoughtful I am, I may still hurt someone's feelings. I once described a provider as "more Rubenesque" than her pictures suggested and I scored her a 7 in appearance. OMG--you would have thought I'd called her a skank! Tearful calls, threatening emails, demands to TER that my review be removed, and on and on.
What are you gonna do?
This thread is about a person who got mad at an opinion that was not beneficial to her, tried to get this opinion removed, and claimed this opinion as well as ter stance was an attack on her. All while she has a no reviews policy?
Would this ever be a thread if the reviewer in question said he thought she was 18 and hence benefited her? Hahahahaaa. Oh that was funny.
And to top it off, you've got plenty of people bowing down and saying omg you're so beautiful etc, ie validation central. Then this person exhibits an apparent generosity with which she says "I'll lead with compassion". Lmao. After she shat on the guy who dared to state a dissenting opinion, and validated herself with a bunch of yes men, now compassion has appeared, deus ex machina style. Well, ain't that a surprise.
Oh and BTW I forgot to give props to Jensen here. I didn't expect a post like that from him, so kudos. If I could like it twice, I would.
Great response ++1
I also read several of this person's other reviews. I will have to take back what I said about not calling names--This guy sounds like a deeply embittered jerk; he seemed to go out of his way to insult and berate and harangue. I hope he can fix his anger and resentment problems before he sees any other women.
Very true and he definitely needs to get his eyes checked, The woman he removed before the OP - Model Eve - is a wannable porn star under the name, Eve Marlowe. She has a recent segment on Tonites Girlfriend. I saw her about the same time as the reviewer. He claims she was voluptuous. She has absolutely zero body fat. If anything, incredibly slim.
Agree she had a banging body. Maybe his version of beer goggles ADDS 10 pounds.
...hell-im in my 60's and i still get carded to by a six pack of beer!!!(last week)....for me...being older and wiser but looking younger....makes sharing my past experiences with a new friend MUCH more exciting!......
When I was younger I didn't want to be the mature & older provider, but now that I am in my 40's I am proud to be considered a MILF. Life is our greatest teacher. TER=YMMV
Not everyone is going to be kind, respectful & caring that's why I screen for chemistry. I don't see everyone who inquires. When I was young I was greedy & wanted money. Now, it's about quality connections. Choose wisely.
Let it go. You know your not 50, but what's wrong with being a beautiful older woman?
I see you now have a rash of new reviews, all very favorably...kudos. Hey but don't hate the player...hate the game.
Lol... 4 of the 5 "new" reviews were wrote specifically to rebuff the December 2021 review she's complaining about. 1 reviewer hadn't posted a review in 10 yrs. While for another one, she was his first review ever. Sounds like she ran a "review" special.
Personally, I'd trust the review she's complaining about over these retaliatory ones.
Ah, sounds like the classic "rebuttal reviews" .
Which in the past was automatic grounds for delisting. 🤦🏻♂️
I'm with you PS. Why is that no longer the policy. It worked well.
they waive that policy if the provider is over 50.
LOL
I figured there had to be some sensible explanation! 
Right.
So let's review the facts
1. Provider has no review policy and asks not to write reviews.
2. Provider - even tho she asks not to review on her site - has screenshot of her TER average rating on her site.?????
3. Provider seems fine with all the positive reviews written for her. Dont see any complains from her on the forum.
4. Provider goes bananas when one bad review is written
What can one deduce from all this?
What difference does her age matter
She’s clearly suffering from extreme anorexia. Which makes one suffering with this disease older than they are.
But I understand some of you whacked mongers love being jabbed with pelvic bones
Yeah your right The other day I saw a woman on fire and when I call 911 they said I was a bigot for disparaging the woman's lifestyle.
This woman picture indicates to me that if she doesn't start eating she'll never make it to her 50th birthday.
With all due respect, the topic has nothing to do with her being a skinny twig. I also have my preferences aligned with yours, but I find it weird you keep on hampering on her appearance lol
Yeah your right how dare I just a woman on her looks...on a site that does nothing but judge women.
Hypocrisy anyone.
I didn't say you can't judge her. I just thought it was offtopic, and you keep bringing it up. That's all. You're certainly more than entitled to your opinion.