I am just wondering what is the standard rate per hour. and why is it some girls are 150$ hour and some 1000 hour? Is price an indication of quality..

I have enjoyed the company of highly UTR ladies at 500 to 1k/hr and on the lower end a few delightful ladies advertising on CL at 200/hr. With respect to service, the difference in price was not reflected in a *commensurate* increase in service.

Very low rates rightly or wrongly suggest to me a high volume approach to the game and are in my experience also associated with a lack of good screening, and budget rate incall locations that are often not as discreet, and less safety overall.

Very high rates in my experience are justified only by truly exceptional appearance, a very classy incall, deluxe treatment which does not necessarily mean better proportionately better sexual performance.

The midrange, in the DC area perhaps 250-350/hr during this recession, seems to be the most common price point for TER providers in this region and generally excellent values are to be found there.

as I see pricing broken into a couple of categories:

The well reviewed ladies with a couple of pages of excellent reviews

The Adult Film industry ladies offering PSE

The well traveled ladies that have a following.

Region will also dictate pricing, ie. NYC, LA will be higher than Dallas, Chicago, etc.

I'm sure there are other instances but these seem to be the common reasons.  Obviously speaking, the ladies in question have to be exceptional in their looks and their performance to warrant the high end.
I think it's pretty rare to find a diamond in the rough these days that's charging $150 for PSE services.

I think it a matter of reputation, especially for the porn stars. Quite frankly, I paid 1K for a porn star and physically she was 8/8, but just the fantasym I pay again.
 Its been my experience is that most hobbyist pay for GFE/PSE and fetishes and will pay for a well reviewed providers who offers these services. On the other hand, providers who are not GFE/PSE and offer no extras are normally factory girls who get them in and get them out, despite 1 hour advertisement and nornally get average reviews.

There are beautiful, high-quality providers at just about every price range. I usually see providers across a broad price range, and the price I'm willing to pay simply reflects how interested I am in seeing someone.

The best providers I've seen at the lower end of the price range ($300-$400) have been just as beautiful and high quality as the best providers I've seen at the upper end ($600-$800).

However, the higher the price the less risk I'm willing to take and the more research I do. Therefore, I tend to see fewer ladies in the higher range.  

200-400 I've only had a few really good times..usually limited service IE: not GFE

400-700 Mostly were much better looking although there are exceptions and most were better service and true GFE.

over 700 well maybe it's because I do better research when spending this kind of $ but all  were stunning and true GFE/PSE

Could be with the lower ranges I knew by reviews certain things were off the menu but decided to give it a go anyway. So going in it's already not what I really want.

This is not a hard and fast rule but in my experience it has proved to be mostly true.
It's just that at lower rates you have to go through a lot more bad ones to find the great ones at that price.

Ladies whom have eye-candy appeal ( and know it ), tend to be able to charge more.  Just the nature of the game!

That being said, I have never paid more than $$$$$/ hr. ...never had to.  Ladies that charge $$$.5 have always been hot enough, and did what was necessary to ensure future visits.  Looks are important, but performance is more!

Just my three pennies...

Not necessarily. Price can be an indicator or self assurance, confidence or conceit, or it can ellude to hidden assets your companion offers.

Is it her model like beauty? Her cultured background? Her ability to converse on any subject, business, political or sports related? Or is it her linguistic skills, fluent in French, Spanish and Arabic.

Whatever it may be, that something, within every "high dollar girl", compels her to break free of standard pricing in search of a bigger catch.

Unfortunately, cost isn't directly proportionate to the quality of their company or the intensity of their passion. If it was, I'd be a $2500 an hour gal.

*wit a smile and a wink *

~Bella  

I'd agree.  With 70 plus ladies, I've had exceptional experiences with 12, bad experiences with 4 (at the beginning of my 'career') and the rest very! pleasant gfe and erotic. Seldom above 350; generally 250 to 300.  The one time I went above 400 it was ok but nothing to write home about. So for more, I'd expect a much higher level of gratification.

In my opinion, not at all.  I've found the opposite, the higher-priced the lady, the more aggravating a meet is.  They think too highly of themselves and sessions have to be "just so".

I've had much better luck finding younger girls (18-25) through various means who are perfectly happy in the $100 per meet range.  Yes, that's not a typo, $100 per meet.  They are usually not swamped with "clients", have regular jobs or actually go to school (and not the BS claims from HDH types), and the meets are much more relaxed and free-form.

Of course in the $100 range there are also the really bad options, so it just takes a lot of filtering, a lot of emailing.  After a time, you learn to sniff out the pros pretending to be non-pros.  You learn to sniff out which emails are handled by the girls themselves rather than a pimp or booker.  You learn to sift through to the ones who are genuinely only looking for a little help and wanting to have a good time, too, and skip over the ones pricing themselves outrageously.

One last point is that I don't negotiate.  If you try negotiate with HDH, they become very rude and insulting, don't bother.  Simply don't give them the business.  You're only a wallet to them anyway.

A stunningly and classically beautiful generally younger woman who has some great porn credits may charge much more money than say a more mature less classically beautiful women but the pleasure of the second woman may be greater for me.  

I have loved being with a number of women who really don't qualify as classically beautiful but who were simply wonderful company.  

There are some limits.  A woman who charges by the half hour is different from one who generally prefers 2 hour appointments.

I have hobbied at many different price ranges.  My experience is that the most common price range in the area has providers that can satisfy the most discriminating tastes.  My preference is to experiment, find someone who is exciting and good company, and then repeat.  On the repeat I like to make prior arrangements for dinner and spend the extra for more quality time.  works for me.

Each lady decides what she may ask in her area to keep her as busy as she wants. This is a very mathematical approach to a very important part of your research.

If you charge too little you will have far to many calls for you to handle, could in the end give sloppy service and by far have more than your little hands can handle on your schedule.

If you charge more than your areas norm for your looks, age, experience and your reviews you'll be sitting by the phone with no one interested.

Kisses Haley

Price coupled with other factors: and so so many other factors.. to look only at price and say 'yes' or 'no' I wonder how many people use only that as their criteria?

There are girls who charge high hourly or minimums that show photos on their sites of bodies not well maintained and/or text with numerous grammatical errors.  I always wonder how much business they truly draw, if they have an alternate income making their need to book less, or what type of clients respond.  (?)

But they stay in biz so.....   maybe it is as simple as slapping a larger price tag on it...

I'm always in hope that people will be responding to me as an individual, actually reading my website and not relying so much on 'reviews' and my time fee will be much less of a deciding factor.

Things that typically tend to draw guys include:

Youth (while above legal limits)
Beauty (in relation to models and stereotype definitions)
Rarity
Skill

The more draws a lady has, the higher she can set her rate and maintain the level of business she wants. Guys view those attributes with different priorities, so there is little concensus on what would be considered "quality". If measured as overall enjoyment of experience, there is probably not a strong correlation between satisfaction of the meeting and the price, outside of problems at the very low end.

Unfortunately Supply & Demand is most often based on Appearance.  IMHO, I think appearance needs to pass a threshold of "attractive" but after that I weight my attraction (inclination to repeat)on Performance.  
Now if you get A + P = PSE....  
skb

in large cities like NYC, Boston, Chicago, SF, LA, etc.  All locations have a certain amount ladies whose going rate is all around the spectrum.  Likewise, some areas have well respected agencies while other areas are strictly a independent lady's haven since the agencies have reputations that are less than stellar.  

It is not always you get what you pay for.  Like most commodities, you sure can overpay.

I saw a lady that charged $400, but another lady that I saw for $240 was better than the $400. However, another lady that charged $700 was the best experience yet.... So from my experience I would say that price is a good indication of quality, in terms of beauty and performance. Even so, I know that there are some that can argue against this.