Addison Ray, an Orange Cty Calif provider, just had her first review posted, a 10-10.

It was also the reviewer's first review.

So it got me to thinking that an awful lot of "first reviews" are posted by guys who had never submitted a review before.

I am assuming these are, for the most part, shills for the girls being reviewed.

So,,,,,,,,,,,,,,my question is,,,,,do you think any of these first time reviews are accurate??????

I've seen TER take action if they see that...

TER claims that they will hold first reviews by first reviewers, however, I see this happen damn near every day.  Not a 10-10, but a review nonetheless.  Don't quite understand the inconsistency.  Must be different review readers.  I could understand it if the reviewer is a long-time frequent poster, but most times that is not the case.

In other word, who the flock knows?  First reviews by first reviewers tend to be, IMHO, a little high in their ratings.  Maybe they are just overwhelmed by the fact that some hot chick had sex with them.   Lots of possible reasons.

Swim

If your smart enough to ask this question you know that some of this is fantasy.  If she is hot TOFTT and post a " certified review".

If the review is less that good/stellar it is quite possibly a regular reviewer using an alias. If it is a 10 10 then then it is probably a shill or worse.

I've been lucky/smart enough not to have to post any totally bad reviews (except a rob in my newb days to the hobby and TER). But I had one less than average that I used an alias to post.

It makes a person wonder if that 10/10 is a ROB, Bait and Switch or even worse....LE with nothing to do but waste tax dollars ruining peoples lives which in turn wastes much needed tax dollars.

especially if it's the first review for the provider.