Why are there so many fake reviews lately? I had one a few months ago describe me as a “tall beautiful brunette”. I just got a new one who wrote in a “Brazilian Barbie”. When you think a blonde American beach girl I’m about as typical of that as they come. I’ve written both reviewers with no response and I’ve written ter with no help. Maybe because I have a lot of reviews the writers think I won’t notice? These shouldn’t be allowed. It’s misleading.

The fake ones? Of course not! They both put really high scores but obviously have no clue who I am.

The fake reviews? Of course not! Both gave the same scores I usually get but neither have a clue who I am.

Really???
.
Perhaps you didn't read her post carefully enough!

I can’t see scores but did they score you lower than average?

TER has been very helpful in taking down all my fake reviews, but I think it's because of my 50% deposit to book policy.

I have seen this before with many reviews. They intentionally give scores that are good and in line with what you have. But they clearly haven't see you. They do it for the free VIP days. It's annoying. Many providers care less as long as the reviews are good. I'm glad to see you're not one of them.

is that it's possible another provider has hijacked your name and website.  I notice that there are no photos that show your face, and there have been instances in the past where fake reviews ended up being a legit review from a customer who thinks he saw you because an ad had a link to your website and TER profile.  The fact that you say they got all of the physical details wrong militates in favor of at least considering this possibility and doing an investigation to see if there is another "Amanda Greene" impersonating you with customers.  I won't say this happens often, but it has occasionally in the past, especially during the CityVibe days.  Some customers only look at photos and don't check things like, "Do the phone number on the website and the one on the ad they saw match?"

It's become more and more common for LE to bust an indie provider and take over her phone number and accounts in exchange for charges dropped; then they use those to bust a whole bunch of mongers.

You've done most of what you can. Maybe the two reviews just selected the wrong profile. Maybe they are just idiots that think no one will notice or it's a review farm bot that is spewing things out.

There are a ton of Amanda's on TER.  Also,  a lot of reviewers just copy and paste from another review without much proofreading.  

To get free VIP days here on TER, the least he (or she) can do is look at the photos on the provider’s website and give a somewhat accurate physical description.  

I have come across identical reviews for different providers multiple times. It’s clear one of them was a copy and paste job. Sometimes they tweak them. Sometimes they don’t and it’s literally word for word. It wouldn’t surprise me if that’s what happened here.

This is a hot take that makes it sound like you are excusing the practice of fake reviews. A fake review is not a stupid mistake, it's deliberate action.

No, I'm not excusing deliberate fake reviews. I'm saying some are just misassigned by stupid reviewers. It happens, especially when the provider has a common first name.

He merely opined as to the possibility of some of them occurring in a different way other than being fraudulent.

and posted it here. It was a complete cut-and-paste job. I reported it and it disappeared. So did the reviewer.

I got a new review today - the reviewer gave me a ten, which I am eligible for - but TER in its apparent omnipotence has decided that I only deserve a nine.  

At least not on TER.

The max score one can give is a 7, unless any one of the below extra services is provided. Each is worth one extra point:
.
1)Kiss with Tongue
2) BBBJ
3) more than one guy
4) more than one girl  
5) anal
.
The session Hextyn mentions can't qualify for a 10 as only two of the above were mentioned in the review.

Technically I would say the guy getting pegged deserves a 10.

that makes no sense

I've had the same thing happen too, but the reviewer remained after the review was removed.  Now every time I see a review of his, I assume it's fake.

Had a similar issue with another site when TER went dark . Tried to get account using my handle from here and found was taken . When gained access found “Oldranger” had 14 reviews 12which were completely lifted from here. Sent DM to Oldranger asking if he had seen all of them andif verything was true - assured me they were accurate . Believe the site owners did this .  
Later found a couple more with different credit .

You’re right, anal still did happen. Just not on you. But TER policies don’t make such distinction. If that’s the reason they lowered your score, they should clarify the policy. And, since that wasn’t clear beforehand, you should get your 10 back.

That's what a lot of us are saying - all anal is real. If anal is a point then let us have it

As examples, TER doesn't give an extra point for foot fetish, role play, corporal punishment, subbing, bondage, etc. From day one, as far as I know, "anal" has always been referencing the girls ass and not the guys. My guess is when they initially came up with the list of additions to the max 7 score you could give without them, anal performed on the woman was the only thing that hit their radar.
.
Giving Hextyn back her 10 could be highly problematic for TER. Do they go back in time and give every provider who was shorted that extra point over the years their point back too? Obviously that would be impossible.  
.
I honestly cant imagine this would hurt Hextyn moving forward, as guys will want that service she provides or not. Her lacking that extra point isn't going to sway a guy to see her, or not see her, imho, but I could be wrong.
.
That said, I do see her/your point as there is some ambiguity on this issue. She also has a fantastic reputation here and has been a valued member of TER for a long time so her objection should not be dismissed out of hand. I would love if TER addressed it publicly but my experience is that rarely ever happens. It is what it is.

A lot of discussion and disagreement on the rules  
Remember the old days when a girl only had to  say she was bi. Stick her tongue in your mouth, and Ifyou wanted a cover on your dick could get a ten.  
Now two guys could go into a massage place have the masseuse DFK both and do a BBJ and get 10 without   sex or anal .

I get TER’s intentions and don’t disagree with your theory on what they probably meant. I have had numerous experiences where a place of business had an unclear policy and it didn’t fully explain what they meant. And, more often than not, they honored their mistake and updated their policy moving forward. And no, they didn’t track down every single customer that it ever impacted. It’s not unusual to limit the exception to those who complain/appeal. In this case, Hextyn has made an appeal, and her rationale makes sense. IMO, the right thing to do is honor her request and update the policy. And if any other provider decides to appeal, they would be given the same opportunity.

Unless the profile section for Anal deletes the Yes/No option and adds Give-Yes Receive-No or Give and Receive - Yes.

Its not just one, it just happens to be topical because I have a new review that has also, like so many others, been edited after the fact by TER.

It would be nice if more people stopped to think about various possible causes rather then the knee-jerk worst scenario reaction that is so prevalent these days.

10/10s have gotten out of control over the last 10 years or so. Back in the day, an 8/8 was considered a good score. A 10/10 was exceptionally rare.

6-7 in real world.  

If they update the policy and make it clear that it only counts if the woman is the receiver, no need to change the profile options. This is what I’m suggesting given it’s their intention. I’m also saying anyone who was impacted before the policy is updated should be allowed a 10 if they pegged/gave anal. Similarly, they didn’t remove old 10s that predated the current requirements even though those don’t meet the current requirements.

-- Modified on 3/21/2026 4:12:10 PM

but opinions can vary especially when the gal is heavily inked and is exotic looking, both of which are preferences of  mine.   In any case, she has lots of photos that reveal her very accurately, so each can decide for themselves.

If the person writing the reviews says she's a 9, or a 10 it should never be adjusted.

I think you’re 100% right but it’s not LE, it’s scammers that are using fake TER reviews to setup fake P4 accounts and then get 50% deposits from people.  They all use the same fake AI generated photos and all require 50% deposits.

This is the phrase that made me think he was excusing fake reviews. Read this on its own and tell me you couldn't have interpreted it the way I did? I'll take him at his word that he didn't intend it that way.
"Also,  a lot of reviewers just copy and paste from another review without much proofreading.  "

Came to say this. I have several from people like this. I just take it in stride.

The comment was about the tone of the OP in general which clearly started with the assumption that the review was fake with no consideration that something else might have happened. It's also not at all clear that the reviewers who "just copy and paste" from other reviews were claimed to be false -- just being lazy and not wanting to actually make the effort to write about what their session was like so they take from an existing review they think is accurate for their session.

Have you ever touched a woman?