Is this thing reliable?  I tested it today on some BP pics and most came back with no image match sort of stuff and one other came back with some sort of site claiming the girl had been busted.  Then I tested it on a couple of TER pics and no matches came up, and these girls have their own websites and the pics are there too.  

No matches can be a good thing. It may mean she didn't borrow a photo off a modelling site or an open instagram, etc...

If she is going to be good tomorrow, won't she be just as good today?

Good points, all. I think what you're saying about Google not looking at escorts sites is true of tinEye too. I have no idea why they don't. I've run searches and it says no results and it's like why didn't it at least come up with the site where I just found it?

So if someone WON'T schedule for the next day (or even later the same day) then this CAN be a red flag.  

You answered your own question. Trick rollers and LE want to get you there ASAP. Same day and usually within an hour. He was talking about how to stay out of trouble with girls that are almost unknown.

and "never book with a girl who will ONLY book same day"

The advice was fine for unknown girls. I'm not going to argue. Not everybody has years of experience doing this. I learned how it works from seeing the miscues of other guys using BP and/or seeing unknown girls in other groups. I'm also familiar with how LE sets up stings.

John took it upon himself to say that. The OP wasn't asking anything of the kind. He was simply asking questions about "Google Image search". John and then you just took it upon yourselves to assume he was seeing unreviewed BP girls.

The OP said:

So for all we know he was just experimenting with Google Image search in general and had no intentions of booking any of the BP girls, looking at his review history doesn't indicate he goes for the bottom of the barrel. Besides if you are going to "test" something like an "image search" where better to try it than on a site known for having fake pics?

Excuse me for not doing a complete search of the OP. The last two girls he saw were 300 per hour. That's about what a legit BP girl is going to cost. I take it you never look outside of TER.

I live in Texas and Texas has never been TER country. I joined TER when I lived in Atlanta, which is most definitely TER country. To give some perspective the Dallas regional board has only had a grand total of 299 thread since the board started 13 years about, by contrast the Atlanta board has had well over 1,500 threads in it's 15 years of existence.  

In small towns I have paid 300 for unreviewed BP girls. Some are unreviewed by choice. I already posted the formula I use a few months ago. I was never ripped off. Gee, what I consider potentially useful information you consider a "lecture."

...While the  posting activity difference between the Atlanta board and the Dallas board is correct, the number of threads is woefully wrong.  Dallas has had 299 PAGES of threads in 13 years.  That amounts to almost 7,500 threads, not 299 threads.

You must be extra extra extra careful on non reviewed BP providers. PM me for other things to do.

Isn't that the usual response when a person has no other defense? lol

Mamasan's claim to be a math geek based on his gotcha post is wrong.  Math involves addition, subtraction, division or multiplication, none of which were involved in his sleuthing.  He simply stated a few numbers but no math was involved.
So he is merely a pedantic yutz.

-- Modified on 7/24/2017 9:12:11 AM

From what I can understand, Google, TinEye etc, rely heavily on cookies and SEO to store these images on their site. Escort sites are not necessarily the ones that get the most hits vs say, Facebook. If an image is original and if it is a site that is not collecting cookies etc, it may just not make enough of an impact on Google's vast database.  

Also you made me inquisitive so I looked up a few things and here's a Reddit thread that you may find helpful.  

The image search is only so good.

They were very very helpful.  To clear up a couple of points,