i had a provider agree to WL me recently, and when I checked my referrals, i noticed the new one was there, but onef rom the past was gone- do whitelists have an expiration date?

She wants to make it a reason to see her again...

I have taken a few back just because you saw a guy once does not mean you will see him again.  Some are real jerks on the boards & text all the time when they are not booking, or flake several times.

You're getting more cynical by the day. I dun like.  

You're automatically WL'd

There's an entire underworld by some gals who use the WL as a means to get specific scores.

On the other hand, what if a guy sees you and gives you a nice review, but after that, you flake a few times or send him a bitchy email.

He can always write a new, less flattering review that will replace the old one.

That I have to deal with just to bribe a woman to suck me off! It's disgusting!

Just know that I'm equally confused as everyone by almost everything you have to say.
I hope that gives you some comfort. lol.

And you get a CBJ and no Greek to boot!

I have never pulled a review though.

Heck, you have guys like Rod who don't want to ever know about some of the crap that really happens in this game we play.

I'll be a curmudgeon in roughly 4 months.  

The fine print says that once TER accepts the review, it becomes their property.  You would then have to make a strong case that there was something wrong with the review.

She explained that it's a serious conflict of interest to have providers giving a benefit to someone who reviewed them well.  She didn't say it extended to her White Lists, when she gave them. Vishnu on Viagra, Roddy, what are we gonna do with your lame ass?  Could you please go somewhere and lurk until you can buy a clue?

Well all I know is , I aint got no reviews now. At least none that show up under my handle. LO

What's rubbing on you?

Am I really that cynical? I thought we were all having fun.

Had that happen to me twice, one at the 6 month point and the other at around one year. Both said they hadn't seen me in a while so they removed the referrals. The interesting thing is how they decide how many months of inactivity with them before they pull the referral. They claim they can't state your still safe since they haven't seen you in so long. But "so long" is all over the map - I still had referrals from girls I hadn't seen in years.

Of course you were replying to Julia but in your pathetic attempt to suck up to her you completely mis-understood her point.  So I'll try, really, really hard and make this even simpler.
Julia said she does not White List any more because she came to believe the White List system is inherently corrupt. The reason she believes it's corrupt is because it permits a provider to give something of value to a reviewer.  Thus, it corrupts the integrity of reviews which are the life blood of this site.
Is that simple enough for your dumb ass to understand?
As for why I get on anybody's ass (not just you), I simply have no patience for idiots and, sadly, there are plenty of them here like you.  Fools who just don't get it.  And when a fool posts erroneous information, it could lead newbies and lurkers to be misinformed and make mistakes.
I'd prefer to never have to flame idiots.  In fact, I belong to another board where virtually all the posters are experienced, smart men and women and there is rarely anything to flame about. I honestly prefer it that way.
As for you, please STFU until you can buy a clue.

-- Modified on 2/17/2014 10:55:28 AM

Let the record show that Roddy is now reduced to spewing smoke and not even bothering to reply to the gist of what I wrote.  Either because he's too stupid to understand it, or has his panties in a bunch to the point where he can't think straight.
Hint: go back and read JLS's original post here.  Slowly.