Write Review
2,072,252 Total Reviews 4,091 New Reviews
9,105 Users Online

TER General Board

In defense of the CBJ
OnlyLiveTwice 27 Reviews 2013 reads
posted
1 / 17
In defense of the CBJ

Like most hobbyists, I have always thought of the CBJ as a poor second choice to a BBBJ. Well, today I was treated to a CBJ that was so good that it would have fooled me, had not see the hat on her tongue.

I guess the trick was to roll the condom on just the end of the tip, just enough to prevent contact with my fluids. I wonder if I should call it a CBBBJ?  

Feeling relaxed at the end of a "hard" day.  ðŸ˜ŽðŸ˜Ž

1256849 25 Reviews 76 reads
posted
2 / 17
Crickets...eom


END OF MESSAGE

EuroModelsShown 82 reads
posted
3 / 17
It's possible...

Even when you know the condom is there.

After a date a good night kiss is better than nothing, but that isn't why you went on the date.

 
I don't object to anyone who wants to practice safe time.

I wouldn't go making up a bs acronym.

WilliamOJobb 41 Reviews 80 reads
posted
4 / 17
It's also Possible

That the Cleveland Browns win the Super Bowl this year.

sdottaylor 19 Reviews 81 reads
posted
5 / 17
CBJ

To me, CBJ will always stand for Columbus Blue Jackets, not covered blow jobs

souls_harbor 73 reads
posted
6 / 17
Me too

Coincidentally I had my first CBJ tonight.  As I suspected, it felt as good as BBBJ.  I may insist upon it in the future.  

I understand for some guys it is psychological, the thought of mouth on dick, so they accept no substitute.  But I guess I don't need that, just like covered FS feels just as good to me as BBFS (only had that with civies and not looking for it with providers.)

ROGM 64 reads
posted
7 / 17
Re: Me too

Posted By: souls_harbor
Re: Me too
Coincidentally I had my first CBJ tonight.  As I suspected, it felt as good as BBBJ.  I may insist upon it in the future.    
   
 I understand for some guys it is psychological, the thought of mouth on dick, so they accept no substitute.  But I guess I don't need that, just like covered FS feels just as good to me as BBFS (only had that with civies and not looking for it with providers.)
You think BBFSCIP is safer with a non working girl than a provider? Really?

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 66 reads
posted
8 / 17
Lucky you! . . .

A covered blow job!!!   You don't see many of those around anymore.  You must feel sort of like an archeologist discovering a relic from the past.  You can add that to your vinyl record collection.

ATLDAWG 79 reads
posted
9 / 17
Nope !

No Covered Blow Job can compare to a Bare Back Blow Job!   To think differently is total BS !!!

I am though glad that the reviewers "Cover" this important topic-because if in the process of reading a review or an ad that talks about a CBJ-I am no longer interested !    

Have a nice day !

souls_harbor 72 reads
posted
10 / 17
Yup!

I just had CBJ for the first time last night, before that only BBBJ.   Yes, in fact, they do compare -- physical sensation-wise.   I can't speak to psychological because that will be different for every guy.

My advice would be to try it out and see for yourself.  If you already know your preference (from experience) then you know your preference.  

I'm thinking of requesting covered from now on because it feels just as good and it is safer.  Really a no brainer.  However, if she doesn't like the taste of rubber, that's sufficient excuse to avoid it.

souls_harbor 71 reads
posted
11 / 17
Didn't say that.

I was recounting history rather than being prescriptive.

GaGambler 76 reads
posted
12 / 17
It's not just a mental thing

The difference between "skin on skin" vs "skin on latex" is night and day. and that goes for P/V, anal, and oral as well.  

 
I think some guys get so little action that they might actually prefer the reduced sensation they get by wearing a condom as they are able to last longer, but speaking for myself, there is simply no comparison between "bare" activities and "covered" I really don't want to die, or alternatively have my dick rot off, so I am not out there raw dogging hookers that I have known for all of five minutes, but to claim there is no difference in the sensation is ridiculous.

souls_harbor 81 reads
posted
13 / 17
Re: It's not just a mental thing

"speaking for myself"  -- I think that covers this discussion for everyone.

I like CBJ and it didn't reduce the sensation (I've had BBBJ my entire life, so I know what they feel like.)  CBJ is a first for me and there really was no difference.   "Speaking for myself."

-- Modified on 7/21/2017 9:58:04 AM

ATLDAWG 72 reads
posted
14 / 17
Nope !

Those Starting to support the process of a Covered Blow Job will next bring demands for a natural, untamed, untrimmed Bush !

No I say-No  !

Bare Back Blow Jobs and Bare Pussy is the Only Way To Go !!!

EuroModelsShown 71 reads
posted
15 / 17
Unless stated otherwise...

It probably is going to be cbj unless you are going by price point.

I've never been surprised that a cbj was on the menu vs bbbj, disappointed maybe but not surprised.  

 
It's not like cbjs don't exist IRL, been getting them since. I want my post approved.

GaGambler 74 reads
posted
16 / 17
If you told me you enjoyed sucking dick, I would say "if it makes you happy" with no judgment

So I suppose if you like CBJ, who am I to tell you otherwise.

 
I have had my share of both, and to me there in simply no comparison, it's like the difference between a peck on the lips and a DFK. Night and day for me.

AznWhtTailHntr 17 Reviews 78 reads
posted
17 / 17
That must have been a real toothy BJ

To have preferred a cover.  If that were the case, then I'd probably want a cover as well.  Other than that reason, I don't understand why there would be a preference for a CBJ.  I've heard of a latex fetish, but I don't think that extends to CBJ's.

Post Reply Back To Forum
Register Now!