Lately I've been seeing more ladies posting pictures with their kitties fully exposed. Some are "artistic", some are blatant, some are middle-of-the-road.

So here's my question.

When you see a provider advertising herself this way, do you...

like it, love it, find it distasteful, jerk off to it... and most importantly, are you more likely to call the lady in question or take a pass?

I love it. If the photo is distasteful then I do not call on that provider. If the photo classy and presented in a artistic manner then I would call on that provider before one who has no photos of that nature.

I don't necessarily find it distasteful but it's not really a turn on for me either. Honestly I like a little something left to the imagination on the gal's website. I'm not going to rush when I get there so I'm not interested in "rushing" to see it all on the site either.

I don't think it would effect my decision as to weather or not I see her. This is much more dependent on reviews and any sort of personality insights that I gain from her site.

Love it. It has no bearing on if I will call.

I personally love seeing a woman in a bikini or sexy but tasteful clothing, but the Full Monty is always a nice surprise.  However, I think the provider's reputation is what ultimately drives my opinion.  I have literally hit the bottom of my desk at work after seeing some pictures of providers.  But, if the reviews are not good, then I don't call.  Nudity vs clothed rarely enters into the decision.

On a slightly separate note, I am so much happier if the person opening the door for the appointment is fairly represented by her pictures, naked or not.  It is such a disappointment to meet with someone who had professional pictures done that no longer represent her true appearance.

I like it. I can see their nipples which for me is a turn on.

"Tasteful" is not what I look for in a one, or two hour fuck session. Pretending that this is some sort of wholesome pageant is ludicrous.




-- Modified on 8/1/2008 1:28:52 PM

I'm much more interested in seeing their tits than pussy. From a pic, every pussy is pretty much the same. But if the tits are exposed, its easier to tell if implants, which I want to avoid, or overly huge, flat etc...I think there is much more variation to tell from tits than pussy. The most important criteria for me in terms of pussy is clean and sweet smelling. No pic will tell me that.

I like tasteful nudes but I'm not so enamoured with gynecological views.

How did you get from "I like a little mystery" to "wholesome"? I don't think anything I posted indicates that I'm looking for lunch with Marry Poppins. Just calm down...

if she has a "look" - and that is very hard to define - I will be attracted.  That said... I LOVE pics that provide me with some concept of what the lady's body truly looks like.  Is she a "pear?"  does she have a big boob look?  is her head bigger than a basketball...?  does she have nice legs... little twigs.... or big beefy thunder thighs...  

In short, will whatever I like, be hiding behind the door.    or will I want to run and hide...?  

IF all there is is a twat shot - It will be difficult to judge anything else...  one thing I do like, is if she reveals her eyes... or conversely - her smile.  She does not have to reveal everything fully - but either her smile or eyes... give a clue wrt her personality... and is quite a turn on!  If her body is nicely proportioned (something you cannot tell from close ups,  or contorted body poses...) that too is a turn on.  

so while that might do it for some, it is not even in the consideration category for me... Unless there is some major defect in it....!???  like Teeth.

hmmm, now I am wondering if my pics on my site are tasteful or not??

Shaved or natural.
Puffy or flat outer labia.
Large or small inner labia.
Is her magic button exposed, or hidden under her hood.
Does she have a wider or narrower platform.


Having said all that, I probably prefer finding some of that out on the rendezvous, but I have seen some lady's sites where they have multiple galleries, and as you progress through each one, more of her natural beauty is revealed.

I find the clothes that she chooses to wear in her pics, and how much of her face is revealed, tell me more of what I want to know.

As another noted, in the end, is she fresh, clean, and delectable?  

Well, that's a big HELL NO!!!!

an alias would pop up to say something crass,


-- Modified on 8/1/2008 3:10:58 PM

and that's not just 'cause I've 'kissed Cecilia' all over.  
The 'flower petal' picture was a fun bit of 'revelation'

do they let me know what you will look like when you open the door - and upon opening the door - create an image of you.  I would offer that they do not.  but hey... to some I am sure that they are fine.  for an example of a nameless model... I have attached a photo of a pose that illustrates what I look for.  Well, maybe it could be with more clothes... but you get an idea of what her body looks like.....

Having seen many female impersonators both on stage and on the street corner, a 'full' shot ends any doubt about the sex of the person in question.  Now there is a difference between a graphic out of 'Hustler' and a tasteful peek like from 'Playboy.'  A woman using the 'Hustler' poses would probably turn me off.  

MVR

Men always tell me that they want a tease. They want to imagine what your kitty looks like. It's part of the excitement and makes total sense.

Over the last few months there have been numerous postings on a regional board that I participate in that have included "fully exposed" shots.

I don't find them offensive, but, I don't see this as a "porn site" as such, and I would not have any interest in a lady who would go to that length to expose herself.

While I understand tha some find those shots stimulating and exciting, in my mind a "lady" promotes herself by creating a bit of mystery about herself. When there is nothing left to the imagination, I lose interest.

Just my opinion...
B

because, for what it's worth, I thought your pictures were very nicely done. Yes, they're revealing, but they are shot with a little more subtlety than the images alluded to in the topic.

Have a beautiful, barely clothed summer!

All my best,
NK

is just encouraging him more

personally i'm not turned on by kittie shots unless i can see her face, she has a great smile and beautiful eyes making contact with me.

The situation is analogous to those "dirty four letter" words.

In the hand of a good writer, they can be utterly appropriate: Catcher in the Rye, for example.

In the hands of others, they come off as being a cheap attempt at being hip.

So it is with the wonderful vulva.

Interesting topic Tabu. Now if a guy sends me a pic of his Johnson..I hit the delete button...

I keep thinking My How Tasty she looks..

i appreciate the more explicit images, but they are not a dealbreaker for me, although i do tend to prefer providers who show face shots.

Your pictures are not only tastefully done, but I could only wish you were in front of my cameras... you are a beautiful lady.

I think they look great Cecilia!  And I don't see why anyone else thinks these don't show how you'd look as you answered the door.  Guys need to remember that some ladies need to blur their face to protect their privacy...

And as far as beaver pics go, I like looking at them, but I generally don't call providers who post gynecological shots on their public website - I've already seen their pinnacle...

When there is too much of explicit "beaver" shots, for some reason, it makes me think differently of the provider, and then I would most likely past them by. Infact, beaver shots is not the deal breaker at all.

I love mystery in a woman. I want to be the one to slowly take off the remainder of her clothes, and expose her lovely parts.

There is a provider, who sometimes post on this board, that I cannot help but look at her site, for it's very tastefully done. She's just so far away!  But, she drapes herself in something sheer, in most of her pics, where you can somewhat see through, but there not enough to fully see the body.
Omigod, my imagination just runs wild, thinking of how I can slowly undrape the sheer off of her~

Now, there is a mature provider who travels to my state from time to time, and her website actually makes me cringe. It's more graphic, and on most of the shots, she is very exposed. Also, she has pics of her and other men, in different stages of acts.
I think she geared to those, who want more of a "porn" session.

A little mystery always catches my attention.

I've seen hardcore action pics and gals spreading their butt cheeks and winking at the camera.  Those go directly to my favorites list.  In my experience, these are good indicators of things to cum.  Besides good reviews, I can think of no better way to judge the good causes to donate your money.

I agree with BizzaroSuperdude. I rarely visit a lady who does not include either a smile or image of her eyes.

And I don't get why smiles are so uncommon. Who determined that the typical "Sneer" was sexy? Give me a great smile or glistening eyes any time!!

Eye of the beholder, I guess,but to me there's nothing about the female anatomy that's distasteful. Love it all. Sure, well-composed and well-lit portraits are more engaging, but photo quality aside, a nice pussy is a nice pussy -- they're all different and fascinating. Bare or bushy, scant or meaty, bring 'em on. And I'm more likely to visit a restaurant when I know what the dinner special looks like.

I find this intriguing.  No I don't like the "nasty" looking crotch shots, but there are plenty of very nice pics out there that show it all in a tasteful manner...On the other side of the coin...a provider that shows all pics totally covered up, or only from the waist up....to me...is hiding something.  
I will take the pass on the lady who show's more than less. As I said...not the "nasty" shots, but I like to see the whole product before I commit to making that call.

ARE tasteful Cecilia.  You have a great diversity of clothed, partially clothed, and more risque.
You also have a lot of pics to look at....nothing worse than a 2 or 3 pic website...always makes me wonder "what's she hiding"?

this is all about Seduction for most of us  on both sides.  Seeing all the goodies to some degree takes away from the fantasy don't you think. But then again, theres all types and someone for everyone really.
Cecelia, your pics are very tastefully done and very sensual, not over the top at all.
And yes I am sure you Gents would like to know what you are getting into, and  in a perfect world we could show our faces, we have lives and families to protect too.  Reviews usually reveal what to expect in her looks, and til we have a perfect world, you may have to settle for the way things are at the moment. Artist nudes can be very seductive and say oodles about a Lady's personality as well as what to expect when you see her. The curve of a Lady's back and behind is very sensual, shadowing in just the right places, hips and shoulders, very sexy. Its these tidbits that lure you into her frame of mind. This tells you more about what she sees as seduction, I believe it's all part of the dance.
stay safe all...
Nicole



-- Modified on 8/2/2008 8:52:39 AM

I think most here will understand what I am trying to say.

and I'm calling to make an appointment.

I'm more likely to go with a provider who shows both her body and her face in the photos.

More neutral than anything.  I would much rather see an attractive lady partially clothed leaving something to my imagination.

-- Modified on 8/3/2008 3:00:58 AM

-- Modified on 8/3/2008 3:06:03 AM

Beauty is in the eye ( mind ) of the beholder

I sort of like the videos when they show waht and how they do it

Check Zulu Knight website

lol. Hey, we're all pervs. And if I go see her, I'll make sure to tell her i jerked off to her photo (isn't that a compliment?)

Tabu- why don't you post a pic of yourself- any I'll get back to you-

(seriously - doesn't matter that much one way or the other to me)

I think sometimes a kitty shot is very nice. OTOH
some should keep there legs closed.
my 02
uc

I find a little mystery very pleasing. A nice thong pic, teenie-weenie bikini, leave just enough to the imagination. OTOH, I do like naked women so nudity is also fine with me. The overall shape of her body is what I find attractive. Her private parts are simply icing on the cake...

I've considered removing the 'up-close and personal' shot, but most seem to like it. I've only had one or two guys that have suggested removing it or didn't care for it. And ironically it gets far more views than any of the other pics!!
I actually like seeing other ladies with tasteful, professionally done kitty shots. But I don't care for the more raunchy, nasty photos that look like they were taken with a camera phone, or the ones that involve toys etc.