It says:

status:  Unapproved  
reason:  Your review was denied for lack of information in the details section. Specifically your review needs more information outside of discussing the physical interaction between you and the provider

So I get an Unapproved ....because it isn't explicit enough..... okay, so I spend an hour going into graphic detail describing my experience, and it comes back Unapproved:
From time to time we choose not to post reviews from users with limited history at TER. This is done with the interests of our community as a whole in mind. We thank you for your understanding.

This really ticks me off....I write a detailed, truthful description and they trash it after I included explicit information that I didn't want to include originally about a provider I really respect and like...well, if TER can't print that, and the original wasn't explicit enough...then I don't know what TER wants or how one gets history, but obviously they don't want my business!

I would normally get rejected becuase I didn't have enough 'acronyms', which I would subsequently add in. Anyone who's seen my reviews knows I'll probably never get the rejection notice you did! (Okay, I 'talk too much'!)

Maybe add some more info on the actual surroundings or someof the things you discussed?

"She opened the door, wearing a limited edition bra and thong set from VS. As I walked in, I could smell the scent of Yankee candles strategically placed around her incall to give the room olfactory ambiance. The energy efficient lighting highlighted her eyes perfectly. Taking me by the hand, she helped me off with my Armani casual wear. I placed my card next to a nice floral decoration on the rosewood dresser. Offering me a glass of Pinot Noir, we settled in on the lovely leather upholstered loveseat to have a nice intro discussion on places we had been to. I was surprised to find she had also spent a summer doing archeological digs in the Pan-Pacific area..."

I guess we now need cliche's to go with our acronyms.

"She made me feel like a real man"
"She looked like a million dollars"
"She uses the standard two-call system"
"I would recommend her to all my friends"
"She looks better than her pictures"

Describe the meeting in emotional terms, like a female romance novelist. Then the review will come back unapproved - Reason: We suspect you had the provider write this review for you.

as opposed to making me feel like a female impersonator?  or a hemaphrodite?

so, at $$$$, I felt i was getting the bargian of the century?

in counterdistinction to the non-standard 2-call system?

but i'm, really a selfish prick so i'm keeping her under my hat and my "friends" can continue to strike out?

even if she didn't, i  only get off so much and no more with an image on my computer screen?


I wonder -  do TER hobbyists who enjoy reading and/or writing, or who have to compose written materials on a regular basis, have an easier time of composing and posting reviews than hobbyists who do not?   It doesn't seem like brain surgery -- was she what you expected?, did she deliver as promised?, what did you do together and how would you rate your encounter? and whatever  additional yada, yada, yada you're interested enough to toss in.


Perhaps the hobbyists who frequently check out new reviews could post some of the best ones as models to follow?  I've seen this done occassionally,  here's something for the most committed hobbyists to consider.

Guess that means to be literate isn't the right thing...to be crass is!

Many of Maddy's friends have tried to put a review up here on TER to find it unapproved, some guys are such great sports they try again, beenthere, done that.

I can imagine your frustration after all the time inputting the information takes to read UNAPPROVED!

Now you know how those 1 million people feel on harmony.

I do wish they would make it easier

sexymaddy

But it sounds more like a Harlequin novel than an actual encounter.  Do you notice such details when you visit a lady?

explaining exactly what is missing from review and how to fix it to get it approved. That helps many to edit their reviews the right way and resubmit them for approval. I think that's awsome.

that passage was meant a bit tongue-in-cheek. I'm usually too engaged in conversation to notice many details right away, except for the lady herself. (How she looks: hair fresh or hasn't been washed that day, her scent, her clothes, painted nails?, etc.)   Where I am more verbose is in the description of shared activities, since I normally don't like just giving an impersonal acronym list, and I don't use 'nauthy talk'. So I always use euphemisms in the initial review and sometimes get lucky in who reads and approves. Most often not, though, and 'be more explicit' is the reason for rejection.

I agree that it's great that TER now gives explanations for rejections.  I've had a few reviews rejected and I was soooo frustrated because I didn't know why.  I would have been very happy to go back and edit my reviews if I knew what needed to be fixed.  I just wanted someone to point out what needed to be fixed.

Also, I wonder if they have different people on staff who approve reviews, which means the review process could be somewhat subjective.  If you submit your review tonight and "Joe Doe" sees it, he may disapprove it, but if you submit an identical review tomorrow and "Mary Doe" sees it, she may approve it.