the age of the person reviewing the provider is relevant. some of the mixed reviews seem to indicate that a young provider may have some negative feelings for an older hobbyist. some of the hobbyist do reveal their age or that they or older and my comparison do tend to support this point.

as i'm a little grey i've noticed it myself.

second it would be interesting to compare subsequent sessions to
determine wether a so so provider improves with a regular. some reviews do suggest that some do in fact improve. i've noticed that some of the providers that are in it for the short term don'while the longer termers definately will improve if you repeat. regular customers mean less risk and a nice constant stream of income. i've found this to be true with a provider who is moody but is willing to engage in much more activity as we get to know each other though her persona remains the same b she always aims to please cause she wants me and my $$ back.

my theories are based upon my behaviorist philosophy. rewards and punishments. the idea essentially is to condition the provider to behave in the manner that the hobbyist wants. this may take some time and several repeats with alittle improvement each time.

in that vein i always bring a little gift. chocolates wine ect.
not expensive necessarily. its a lot harder for a hard women to treat you dismissive when you were nice. on the other hand if the gifts mean nothing then you got a stone cold b and it may be a waste of time. nice to find that out early without blowing a lot of $$.

the incall information is sometimes vague. I believe that the providers who have incall at their home are safer and more responsive. after all you know where they live. they risk an unstable and unsatisfied hobbyist coming back and harrasing them. not me of course but they have a vested interest in not pissing off the customer. also le not likley to infiltrate a private residence. i understand that the law gives the individual the maximum right to privacy in the home and is the most difficult place to search. they tend to go after the hotel and street walker crowd. lots of prey and easier to catch. they prefer the path to least resistence just like any other predator.

in the end the contingencies of reinforcement dominate the providers behavior. in the beginning the provider feels that she dominates because she is providing the reward. the key is to even the playing field by making her feel that she wants your reward, regular $, nice guy, presents ect., as much or more than you need her. this can't be acheived in one session. so a hotty with a so so attitude may be conditioned to be a hottie with a gfe attitude for you but not in one session. of course the providers that already get the message and provide 8-10 service are easier to deal with but they tend to be older. its the young poviders that need to training. most i believe could care less if they get a bad review. they think their so hot and that their looks are eternal. like i stated previously i have completely turned a young hottie with big attitude completely so that she "worries" that she pissed me off. she called and apologized for not being up to par on a particular evening. even though i had a great time i let her think i was pissed but nice gut that i am i forgave her.

with her i always get gfe no matter what b mood she's in. it took a little time and patience but now i have a blast with a provider that has some pretty weak reviews. i mentioned the reviews to her and she could care less. she does like the little  gifts, hot oil rubs i give her and the regular donaro to much to let me go home unhappy. as a hobbyist i find it fun and challenging to watch their behavior being modified to my liking.

by the way the first visit was $$$ now she happy with $$ or less.

i would suggest each hobbyist read b.f skinner's book entitled
Beyond Freedom and Dignity as it spells out exactly how to use rewards and punishments to shape human and provider behavior.

its basically a manual on how to shape people and providers behavior. it works!

what do you think?