Write Review
2,076,598 Total Reviews 3,607 New Reviews
10,314 Users Online

TER General Board

Compilation of 47 provider encounters
tothe 46 Reviews 1740 reads
posted

For what it's worth, I have tallied 47 different provider encounters since taking up hobbying less than 3 years ago, rating for looks and encounter experience as follows:

Looks:
(+)     Met or exceeded expectations on looks.  Looked like a woman I definitely would want to fuck.   Results  =  20 of 47

(-)     Looks were a significant disappointment.  Looked like a chick that I would not likely fuck for free unless I was significantly tanked, if even then.  Results  =  11 of 47

(+/-)  Not up to expectations.  Would not lust after them. Might fuck them for free with a couple drinks but not for pay.  Results  =  16 of 47

Summary:  57% disappointment or worse in regard to looks.

Experience:
(+)     Good time/good memory.  Even though looks might not be as expected, wouldn’t have wanted to miss it.  Results  =  33 of 47

(-)      Wished I could get out of it.  Made me feel cheated and/or dirty.  Results  =  5 of 47 (4 of the five occurred in first few months of hobbying.  One was very recent.)

(+/-)   I got off, but overall experience was not great.  Could have done without it.  Results  =  9 of 47

Summary:
70% good or worthwhile experience
30% negative experience or could have done without

IceCube³246 reads

is just for shits and giggles? Am I missing the bigger picture?

ReplyQuoteReport
Jack_Schitt267 reads

cut out the fucking MATH and go get laid already.

100% don't fucking care'

Thats all the math i need to do

ReplyQuoteReport
MP67255 reads

Or WTF-ever it is they say makes people sleepy and post stupid-ass shit.

Dude. WTF are you on? I know you're a Hawaiian and one of my cousins tells me you got some killer shit growing there.

Puff, puff, give motherfucker. C'mon!

ReplyQuoteReport
inicky46142 reads

it sucks ass.  The residents of the Puna district in the east end of the Big Island (most are major stoners) only smoke local weed if they can't get the good shit from off island.  My SO is a major weed conoisseur and hates Hawaiian pot.  I could care less.  My drug of choice is vodka.

ReplyQuoteReport
dtero203 reads

Thank you for sharing this extremely interesting data set.  I took some time to enter your data on a spreadsheet and generated a number of graphs that better display your data.  In addition, I applied some statistical data analysis of the numbers and came up some interesting predictions about future encounters. I will send you a copy of the four graphs and several pages of statistical analysis via your email.

ReplyQuoteReport
IceCube³168 reads

He needs a shrink, not a statistician...

ReplyQuoteReport
FuckTheShutUp122 reads

Posted By: PanAmlong
For what it's worth, I have tallied 47 different provider encounters since taking up hobbying less than 3 years ago, rating for looks and encounter experience as follows:

Looks:
(+)     Met or exceeded expectations on looks.  Looked like a woman I definitely would want to fuck.   Results  =  20 of 47

(-)     Looks were a significant disappointment.  Looked like a chick that I would not likely fuck for free unless I was significantly tanked, if even then.  Results  =  11 of 47

(+/-)  Not up to expectations.  Would not lust after them. Might fuck them for free with a couple drinks but not for pay.  Results  =  16 of 47

Summary:  57% disappointment or worse in regard to looks.

Experience:
(+)     Good time/good memory.  Even though looks might not be as expected, wouldn’t have wanted to miss it.  Results  =  33 of 47

(-)      Wished I could get out of it.  Made me feel cheated and/or dirty.  Results  =  5 of 47 (4 of the five occurred in first few months of hobbying.  One was very recent.)

(+/-)   I got off, but overall experience was not great.  Could have done without it.  Results  =  9 of 47

Summary:
70% good or worthwhile experience
30% negative experience or could have done without

ReplyQuoteReport
Rayen146 reads

C'mon.  You sound like an idiot with too much time on his hands.  Bad judgement.  Where are you finding these women?  That's a valid question.  Every review is subjective and maybe the reviewer is like Forrest Gump.  Jesus.  47 reviews by a mental patient as far as anyone knows....

ReplyQuoteReport
Mathemetician123 reads

You got that right.  He has bad judgement.
 He does have good math skills.

ReplyQuoteReport
HalfHour128 reads

...can come from websites with no facial photos, and photos that sorta look good but you can't really tell.

I have found the same thing: some women look better than photos, some the same and some worse.

I think the problems of the experiences can be anything from a chemistry issue to likes and dislikes of each person, to something that the client OR the provider does wrong.

However, guys only "buy" when they are ready to go! Some providers "sell" when they would rather be doing something else and, if they are not professional enough, if can lead to a poor session. That's just a dynamic that will always be there.

:)
HH

ReplyQuoteReport
Susquehanna61128 reads


two phenomena:

(1) In many cases, ladies post only the most flattering photos of themselves;

(2) As men, we're predisposed to hope for the best....AND....we're fuk'n horny.

I don't think the guy's a mental patient at all; I've had similar experiences, though I've never "run the numbers" and have no desire to.

By and large, my expereinces have been great.  Yeah, I've been disappointed a few times, but then again, I don't really wanna know what's going through her mind when she sees my ugly ass for the first time.

ReplyQuoteReport
HalfHour103 reads

ReplyQuoteReport
transcend2007131 reads

I appreciate the time you took to share this info.  The reason most of us are here is to increase our number of positive encounters.  My purpose for reading other reviews is to seek out a positive experience in advance (and eliminate the ones I find would be less positive).

70% positive experiences is good, but as you stated the majority of your most recent experiences have been positive.

2 questions:  Were you using TER when you first started?  How do you account for your more current sessions being more positive?  If there was a lesson learned please share it.

ReplyQuoteReport
tothe160 reads

The distribution of 4 of 5 of the encounters rated negative both in appearance and experience occurred early on, before I began doing extensive TER research.  The other was quite recent and occurred in spite of very extensive research.  All the others, +, -, and +/-  were pretty evenly distributed throughout this time.  So, I wouldn't say that the more recent sessions have otherwise been much more positive than earlier ones, if any.

For me, the take away lesson is this:  Even with very careful research, there's only slightly over a 40% chance that the provider I set up a date with will end up looking hot enough that I am happy to pay to fuck her.  Also, at least a couple of those ended up being less than fully positive experiences.

To the rest of you fucking, wart-dicked morons that can't fathom my o.p., I invite you to do 100 deep knee bends over a fire-hydrant, in the hope that it will improve blood distribution to your sadly compromised brains.

ReplyQuoteReport
Post Reply Back To Forum
Register Now!