I agree in that if I won't repeat but it has nothing specific to do with the lady other then not my type I don't bother to say it. I would only say I wont repeat if there is a specific thing that was done or not done that was mentioned in the details. Many other ladies I won't repeat with but it is not in the review or there is no review since the reason is specific to me. What use is it to the other guys or even the lady herself unless it was for a specific reason.
As far as real short reviews I don't whole hardly agree. My first priority on seeing a review is OK she is not LE or bait and switch or up-sell. There will be girls who are absolutely not my type and I can't wait for the session to get over, but if it's a good honest session I will, if she has minimal reviews give a shortened review just to let the guys know she is OK to see.

The Juicy Details are a valuable guide re what kind of session she offers and what's really on the menu.  A three-line review is almost worthless for that.  Given the review guidelines I don't understand why the Review Gods approve such reviews.

.....  other than just the fact that they're not a scam, is how the providers actually looks.  Are the pictures an accurate representation?  Is the provider's body as pictured?  Beyond that, a brief description of overall attitude and services offerred is all I care to read about.  That being said, I must admit that my reviews end up being on the long side.

I don't care about all the positions unless she has a preferance or declines one (that I might want).   The attitude is VERY important...  one new provider I have an eye on made a remark that the client "expected a lot for his fee".  Granted she is both new & young but that is the reason I don't usually go with younger ladies.  In the end, following the why must be if you would repeat.  To me that says the most.