Very dangerous grounds you're treading.  A lady's weight can vary quite a bit depending on time of month, body structure, exercise.  Consider a lady, 5'8" could be 140# and be really toned. I'm 5'6" and 140.  Would I pass over a beautiful amazon goddess just because she weighed the same as me? Pics and recent reviews will narrow your choices between fact and fiction.

C'mon folks.  

Look at the pics.

Look at the stats.

Do the pics appear to contradict the stats?

Remember your previous experiences, and try to weigh [no pun intended] the evidence before you, as best you can.  Remember, no one's life is at stake if your analysis is wrong.

How recent was the review "a few pounds ago"?

Do the pics appear to vary greatly?

This would never happen, but I think that body fat percentage, not  weight, would be a lot more usuful as a vital statistic.  It couldn't hurt to have both.

And don't forget, people will differ as to what they consider to be plump, heavy, big-boned, fat.

TER profiles are pretty static, weight is not

I think one can argue about its value, but the profiles are very difficult to get changed. Whatever the first person writes becomes gospel forever. That is one of the major problems with TER review process that as things change (offerings, price, etc) the profile doesn't reflect it.
 Notice that age is listed as a range. You can bet that the accuracy of a weight item would only exist if the categories were
0 - 60 pounds
61 - 240 pounds
Heavier
I would be happy if things around services were accurate. I don't know if you are a VIP but the details often will mention the lady's weight relative to what her photos present

I can't look at a woman and guess her weight.  I can't take a woman's weight and guess how she looks.  IMHO, most guys are in the same boat.  In other words, it's a stat that's going to get fucked up and cause bad feelings far more often than it's going to say something useful.

You want client to estimate her weight?

Reviewers are already so different on their limited choices of body type, looks, and performance that asking for a specific weight wouldn't give any better data.

My estimate of her weight may be WAY OFF.
Is she 140 or 142?

You want muscle, you got it baby. My arms would frighten you . . . :)

I'm fairly tall and long-waisted, so I look skinnier naked. A lot of it's muscle and the main muscle that weighs the most is the one that massages your possibly teeny dick, and believe me it is working overtime baby.

Hugs,
ciara

-- Modified on 7/20/2007 7:01:45 PM

As been mentioned over and over, muscle is much heavier than fat. Besides, the best time I ever had was with a casual GF that was fairly plump. She is the most sensual woman I've met to date. She could beat ya like a rented mule and leave ya whimpering and quivering for quite some time afterwards!....hehehe I'd have the tremors for days....lol

Sensuality and being sexually attractive have nothing to do with a woman's size, in my opinion.

Just a checkbox with the word Fatty would be enough.  Guessing poundage should be left to the county fair.