Below is a review I submitted which was unapproved because TER said it wasn't explicit enough in the juicy details. As far as I'm concerned, the review is informative without deteriorating into a pornographic "Letter to Penthouse." And I don't think the content is all that much different from other approved reviews I've submitted. I'd be interested in hearing the opinions of providers and hobbyists. Thanks.

FIRST PART OF REVIEW:
Quite simply for me the best escort experience -- EVER. Alex has the silkiest skin I've ever touched - simply electrifying - the cutest accent, the sweetest kisses, and an incredible attitude. She's gorgeous with the nicest breasts I've ever encountered. GFE, BBBJ, DFK. The previous reviews which rated her nicely but not spectacularly leave me a bit baffled. Did I just meet her on a good day?

THE JUICY DETAILS:
Just when I was becoming a little jaded with the hobby -- too many pleasant encounters but nothing that rocked my world -- along comes Alex. There may be many gals just as beautiful, but, in my humble opinion, I can think of none MORE beautiful. My ideal of feminine perfection. Upon arriving at her hotel room, she greeted me dressed in a silky top and sexy skirt. Afer checking my ID, she asked if I wanted to shower, so I left my gift on the table, jumped in the tub and quickly soaped up and rinsed off. After drying off, there was some curious business where she asked me to sign some form assuring her I was not LE (which seemed a bit ridiculous, considering LE would probably merely confiscate the paper and destroy it), but I humord her. Then it was on to one of the most sexually satisfying experiences of my life. In fairness to my fellow hobbyists, I should note that it doesn't take all that much to make me happy -- I'm not one of those guys into the fake moaning and theatrics, so Alex may be a bit understated for those who like that sort of thing. But, for me, her soft moans at the right moments, the rocking, grinding and  squirming was enough to turn me on, yet not cause any premature ejaculations, just the right technique, in my opinion.

Oh, and she also caused me to reevaluate my opinion of implants. Prior to meeting her, all the implants I'd encountered were rock-solid and I could feel the plastic beneath the skin (ugh). Her breasts felt oh-so-natural -- a real treat.

She's 5 stars in my book. I look forward to more ecstacy with her in the future.

I would have to agree with the support group on this one.  There is not enough explicit details.  Does it answer the simple question:  What happened.  IMHO No.

-- Staff

Looks Acceptable to me

I have also had a review rejected owing to not "Enough details".  But I have run across approved reviews that said not much more than "had sex, left a gift".  I do get the feeling that depending on who is doing the approving at TER on a particular day (just my guess that there is more than one person doing approvals), the approvals can be very subjective.


-- Modified on 6/12/2002 7:43:48 PM

Between BOTH sections, I'd say it was good enough.....perhaps the problem was that the "juciy details" were actually in the "first part of the review", which are free. Perhaps TER would rather you keep the specifics in the "juicy details" section, where they require memebership to access.

Side note, between this post and the thread below from Schlong...rejected reviews. It has only happen to me once, and I made an arguement to get it posted and it was (the gal I reviewed did not have her picture on the agency webpage, but she WAS from that agency, so I used that agency link). Anyway, the point I am trying to make is, I find it curious that reviews get rejected so often. I know mine tend to be explicted, because I figure my fellow hobbyist want to know exactly what happened (I know *I* prefer details). What could you guys be doing "wrong", or is it really a crap shoot?

This is another interesting topic.  

The amount of juicy details is a subjective thing.  I have read reviews that are four sentences and others that are several paragraphs.

Do keep in mind, the revenue stream for TER and other review boards are the quality of the reviews.  Generally speaking, most reviewers want explicit details on the blow-by-blow account in order to postulate what type of encounter they should expect.  

Things like the -- provider's attitude, session being rushed, personal hygiene, actual service provided, etc ... are key/essential elements of the juicy details.

In addition, when hobbyist provide high performance ranking, TER staff and other reviews would like to know why.   What special favors did the provider include in her session that made the over all encounter so wonderful?

Hope this helps.


-- Modified on 6/13/2002 7:19:41 AM

the entire review. The first part does tell me DFK, BBBJ, GFE. I can infer that there was no DATY, so would not see her based upon this one review. Know that he had intercourse and that it was in a more sensual style than sexual. May not be the most explicit review ever written, but does give me the basic info as to what I can expect. Close call either way, however.

You can still be a gentleman and also be informative.  Maybe that issue is what leads some reviewers to be so discreet that their reviews are insufficiently detailed.

A rundown of the menu, and the levels of skill and enthusiasm are crucial for a useful review.

The YMMV issue has to be taken into account, especially with an explicit accounting of the menu selections.  However, pretty much everyone understands that these days.

The thing that really bothers me (and causes me to question the veracity of the review) is bragging.  "I made her cum 172 times, etc., etc."

Finally, attitude and personality (although also YMMV driven) are, for me, even more important than the explicit details.