Usually say
1) they've never had sex with a civvy girl...
Or
2) they don't have a s.o. to worry about spreading disease to
Or
3)  they trust the other's claim that she or he is clean.

Too risky for me but whatever floats their boat.

It's bad that what you say is true and yet its a risk like any other facet of life that you have to deal with on one level or another. Those that think or claim they know the other person have a fool for an ego, and that fool with eventually get them killed. Immunity is fool's gold. There are risks period and the only thing you have working for you is using your real brain. HIV in particular is mostly about behavior. Sharing needles, BBFS, screwing barflys, sleeping around and playing Russian Roulette with condom use, other forms of sex that include bodily fluids are all symptoms of a burgeoning problem that is only going to escalate.

No alias here, me, I would run naked out of there. Not even a little curious about bbfs. I know someone's gonna call b.s.,, but remember, if she is willing to go bareback, and you think its only with you, your a Damn fool. My regular and I are very intimate, very much friends before partners, but we have never ever discussed bbfs. Run..

Invincibility complex, thrill seeking and perhaps just a bit of a death wish.

I can't possibly imagine the justification for the personal risk (to either myself or a provider) or to the extended network of people affected by such a careless risk.

I can think of several reasons why it would be offered:

1) An emotional connection that gets out of control
2) A desire to make the client more generous
3) A pessimistic outlook on life / "suicide girl" attitude
4) Unwholesome risk taking, thrill seeking
5) Condomitis: some girls don't like them

and more....

The reasons why it might be accepted:

1) An emotional connection that gets out of control
2) A desire to make the provider more generous
3) A pessimistic outlook on life / "suicide guy" attitude
4) Unwholesome risk taking, thrill seeking
5) Condomitis: some guys don't like them

I totally agree, there are a lot of providers and clients doing this.  I have been offered additional money and get asked very often for this kind of service.  Being an adult actress, gentlemen will assume I offer BBFS and will go as far as letting me know they have and STD/AIDS test.  I let them know that under no circumstances do I offer BBFS regardless of what kind of test they have and that includes the test the adult industry uses.  I enjoy what I do however, I'm not willing to get sick over it.  If I get sick, my filming career is over and there will be worse consequences in my personal life.  


We are all responsible for our own well being and in this business our risky behavior can hurt others.

It just seems to me that some people are dangerously complacent about bbfs.  

Perhaps in the past, I was just unaware of the availability.

Or maybe, I'm still clueless.  Given the health risks, I just don't understand why anyone would gamble.

Becca, I don't get it.  Then why do pornstars do bbfs with each other in movies?  Pornstars get tested regulary and then they go bbbfs on screen with each other.  Why couldn't a porn star provider to that with his cliet with a current std test?  

When two porn stars go at it bbfs because they are tested, who is to say that one did not have unsafe relationships with another of film and in their private life and picked up something?  I don't get it?  

I'm not one to go for bbfs, just curious that's all.  Thanks.