The following is a verbatim description of a massage session:

"Not that great of a massage, a lot of rubbing up and down. It was very sensual, but not therapeutic. her body slides were ok, very sexy though, she would come up close to my face so I could look her in the eye, gave a little to hope for but doesn't allow kissing or anything. I opted for the 4 hand option which was great, the other girl was xxxxx. They worked together really well, knew each others movements so it made it easy on them. the flip was great. No FIV but playing with her body is ok as long as you're not too rough. kind of rushed the session, ending wasnt great, made me finish myself so ymmv.. such a great body though, i could stay there all day just for that lol."

 
In summary: Not that great of a massage, extra contact limited, kinda rushed, ending wasn't great. Somehow this rates the highest possible score for the services provided. SMH.  

Mongers need to grow a pair and call an average effort average. End of rant.

Over-scoring seems to be endemic to the FBSM crowd.   I rarely do these anymore, but when I'm in the mood, I filter for massage WITH blowjob.  When BJ is on the menu, usually they allow touching, kissing, etc.  Not always, but less risk of other limitations when knowing BJ is on the menu.  

... Nor the opposite approach where the reviewer raved about a session them gives a mediocre score.

*smh*

... and the reverse (low scoring) are due to reviewers not taking the time to understand the scoring system. So in this case, maybe the reviewer thought he should give a 7 because she did enough services to qualify for it. And in the low-ball cases, the reviewer might believe the highest score possible is 7 because there was no FS.  I've seen many reviews (under the current rules) like that, ala the score was 7, the session included DFK and BBBJ, and the review says "I'd like to give her a higher score, but the rules don't allow it."  😳

What score do you think we should give?

END OF MESSAGE

I try to give a little guidance as to what the numbers should reflect, without overtly manipulating of course, to those who wish to write a review but sometimes the clueless simply will  not listen lol.  

I had recently-posted review whose author said "But a 7 is a Hot Time! Isn't that good?"..... in these situations, all I can do is laugh.  

END OF MESSAGE

END OF MESSAGE

Who give all ladies 10s.  Those weasels get deleted from my research.

http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/ter-general-12/x-out-of-y-is-a-10-out-of-10-suggestion-928187?#928187
.
It easily distinguishes a 7-out-of-10 from a 7-out-of-7. And I have had some fantastic 7-out-of-7s!!

........ do I make the score a 10/10?

I've seen guys here who rate a duo a 9 or 10 for looks, but in one-on-one sessions, only rated those same providers a 7 or 8.

that can't seem to make the separation between looks and performance.  If they see a girl that was a 5 for performance, they downgrade her on looks as well.  It makes all of their reviews suspect and not reliable.  I've had a 10 performance from a girl with 7 looks.  I don't let either one influence the other.  Some guys want to see hot-looking women and don't care too much about performance, and some guys are like me who love a 9 or 10 performance even if she looks like a Hobbit.  Well, maybe not a Hobbit, but at least a fresh-faced GND.

9 for looks and I'm pretty sure she would rip me a new one. So a 10 for performance.

You used Klingon women where were GND and not DDG.  That's very honest of you.