Ok just gotta vent and see if anyone else feels the same. Just read a review and the it said " I don't talk and tell but (provider name) will not leave you disappointed". He then wrote 2 or 3 more lines of very general info and that was it. WTF??  Why bother writing a review at all?  I thought someone reviewed these before allowing them to be published. IMO the SOB ought a be banned from writing reviews!!  Ok. I feel a Lille better now but dude, get a fu$$$ng clue will ya???

The guy is under no obligation to give you any information.  If you think otherwise, then you really need to learn how this works.

Be thankful for what you got.  Don't be an asshole and bitch about what you think you were entitled to.

is lack of explicit details in the "Juicy Section" And he does have a point. The reviews w/o enough details shouldn't be permitted..

Although banning someone for that is a little too harsh...Just pull the review and not allow it till more details are written...

And I'm saying he should graciously accept what he got, or he should just shut the fuck up.  Because the truth is that none of us DESERVE any information on any women.  We all should just be thankful we have any information whatsoever.

Some of us remember what it was like before TER existed.

...........and some men still have  a "don't kiss and tell" ethic, I know that when I first started writing reviews I had to overcome this, since I'm an old guy and many of us had "gentlemen don't kiss and tell" drilled into us.  I don't know the reviewer in this case, but sometimes this comes into play.  Everybody's different, some reviewers want to write a self aggrandizing novelette, others write as if they just found out what the joy of sex is about.  It's all good.  IMHO, the main reasons for the review are to answer the questions, was the woman who she advertised she was?  What's on the menu, did the reviewer have a good time and will he repeat?

Some of us know what it was like to have zero information and went in blind.

Many of us have TOFTT on more tha one occasion.

I don't get the entitlement here.

No one is forcing you to write..

When I write, I make sure that my reviews are not only objective but also help the community..

Reviews like these (follow the link) don't help anyone, and I am glad that TER, typically doesn't allow them

Its about having a certain bar or standard if you will...

Now I haven't seen those reviews, so I can't comment on the fact that the rejection was justified or not, but if I as a hobbyist feels that the review doesn't really help the community, then I will, as an approver, reject it for sure.

*Edited for Grammar...

-- Modified on 2/24/2013 12:54:58 PM

Don't like it?  Stop paying VIP membership and find your info elsewhere.  No one is putting a gun to your head saying you gotta buy VIP, and no one is putting a guy to any client's head saying he needs to put in a certain amount of detail.

Go find another provider or use another review to base your judgement..

And the guy should stop bitching to us, but instead complain to TER.

But he is still getting more info than he would otherwise get, so I don't get the sense of entitlement.  He can cancel his membership.

That were obviously written by a guy who is smitten with the provider?

I know a ton of WK reviews written by guys who were either completely fucking blind or who somehow have much lower standards than the rest of us.

Let's just take a look at the "American Courtesans" website and look at the unblurred face pics of some of those providers, and then compare that to the scores which some guys gave them.

Because if you wanna complain about lack of detail, let's talk about the preponderence of fairly useless detail given by other reviewers.

We can open Pandora's Box here...

...... and TER has a "certain bar or standard".  Granted it may not be enforced to your liking, but they do enforce it.  Once again in the "rules" mode are we this morning? Well, we missed ya Curly.
                                                                                                                               
                                               

of the spectrum, and sadly there is nothing one can do about it other than acknowledge the existence of WKs and look at their body of work (review history)..

People who hand out 10s like popsicles do it quite often.

TER has its own standards, whatever they are.

It's their site.  If you don't like it, move on.

Even if I am a big presence on this board or on TER, me complaining to them is like some big spender threatening Amex that they are gonna lose his business as a Black/Centurion card member if they don't change their policies.

You think Amex cares?  You think TER cares?

It's simple.  If you don't like it, leave.  There are over 18.6k users online right now.  You think they give a shit about what I think?  Haha.

But I was just taking up a notch and stating what those standards should be...

You know me.. I like to tell people what they should think...a lot.. Although I am trying to get away from it..

Last 10 days have been very painful..

Already getting PMs from people trying to involve me in something that happened recently on this board.

Seriously...just because I otherwise agree with you doesn't mean I want to take up the crusade of WK-ing for a provider.

I wonder how many times a provider even wants a guy to get involved.  Seems like most of these guys do it on their own volition.

Anyway, back to our scheduled programming...

Which is ironic, since the whole purpose of this activity is to have it be no-strings-attached, right?

have brought up...

"So did you hear that so and so is no longer doing doubles w/ so and so b/c so and so did this and that?"
"Have you heard the latest drama about so and so? Do you have an insight?"
etc. etc.

I like a man who just wants to fuck and talk about me (and him) during our time together. no provider drama pls!



-- Modified on 2/24/2013 10:28:53 AM

I've seen several ladies, but have only posted two reviews.

Frankly, I'm not comfortable posting explicit details of a date because it sounds demeaning to the lady.  Even if she doesn't mind it, I do.

Some reviews are totally useless.  The one you cite sounds like one of them.  I'd say, while it's true no one has an obligation to pass along any info if they choose not to, if you're going to write a review include information and descriptions readers will find useful.  What kind of information do you look for when you read a review?  Include similar information in your reviews or don't bother to write one at all.  You certainly have no obligation to write reviews.  Then, if you want VIP, pay for it.  But don't write a review that barely passes standards, and won't help anybody, just to get free VIP.  TER should, IMO, do a better job of weeding out reviews like the one you describe because they do not help members get the information they expect when they pay to be members of this site.

LOL, agreed. I don't think the OP is bitching about the system, but the fairness and consistency overall. If you're going to demand a certain standard of review content, it should be that way for everyone. I have seen reviews rated 10/10 for nothing but a damn hand job, and it was 3 sentences. WTF...really?

you give such a stellar hand job.  Kudos!  LMAO!
PS: I must point out that unlike your use of censored words like f*ck, etc., you were OK with "hand job."  What about "blow job?"  Enquiring minds want to know.

I will never post a review because there are some things I want to keep private.  Feels like it cheapens the experience if I am sharing EVERY detail.  Plus I hope to have reoccuring players and am not sure if the providers involved would want that information out there.