That seems to be the rationale of some girls here. That if the guys just walked away at the door if they see a girl who clearly is MUCH older than her pics, that would solve the problem.

However if she keeps getting away with it, there is no reason for her to stop. If she is getting paid for being a liar, she sees no reason to stop.  

FPH fake pic or False Photo HOs are a major problem in the hobby. We should sign a petition with the Obama administration to enforce restrictions on how old of a pic HOs can use and to lift the JCA bill which blames men for False photos.

Everybody be responsible for themselves. Honestly how many reviews start with "well she's not the girl in the pic but…" You stayed and payed? You're responsible. You left because being lied to isn't a great way to start a fling? Nobody to blame but herself.

that line of thinking is tantamount to victim blaming, at least to an extent, right?

Sure, if her pix aren't her or she's much older or much heavier, the guy should be able to walk away with no retribution.  But if she's BSC/nasty and BLs him or goes after him in some other way, there's not much he can do.  Never was, never will be.  And complaining about it doesn't accomplish squat.  So vent all you want and, when you're done, nothing will have changed.
And who ever said girls that use B&S pictures blame the guys?  Never heard that one before.

...but that seems to be the only avenue for calling a woman as mutton dressed as lamb.

It was a point of contention on the NB this week. lol.

Until the situation has a good remedy, there is little tricks can do, same as there is little a woman can do. However, to cease being a victim, there are some things one can do to lessen the impact.

Women are constantly at the mercy of the review system and allow things they would not for fear of a bad review. You get yours this way. Neither is fair but will it stop, not in this lifetime.

You weren't espousing this view on the NB convo. Did you have a change of heart on this from my posts and others over there?  

The "stayed and played" part is, for some, out of fear of reprisal, not just to get their dick wet.

The issue is that a scammer is going to keep scamming until it stops paying. The advice to not pay the scammer still stands. Rather than get all nit-picky, why don't you go ahead and post your PSA for how to deal with BSC hookers?

-- Modified on 10/23/2014 1:37:22 PM

Don't worry. A dick sized thread is coming soon for you.

However why reward a bad deed? Yep rock meet hard place and I have no alternate solution to this and many other "them vs us" issues that are rampant around here. We can each do our own thing to deal with it.

I try to see who has reviewed her and cross check those guys reviews with mutual ladies we've seen. I've also learned that if they always pose with something covering their midsection or arms overhead they are probably trying to stretch out a belly roll. I've seen probably 5 ladies that as I walked away I was pissed off. And usually it was because i was in a hurry and didn't do my homework. And it is hard to walk out once that door is closed. I've done it once.

Do you really think many reviewers use that as a threat to make the girl do more? I certainly don't. From what I've noticed, some Hos do reduce their services and get lazy when they know that there won't be review repercussions. On the other hand, if the girl offers the service and tricks are paying, the ho damn well better be giving a good performance otherwise she's just another rip off ho. In many cases, accountability is a good thing.

Or at least reasonably so. You have to remember, that MANY guys, especially the newbs, are scared shitless when they get to that door.  

But guys are responsible for their own actions... research, safety, & privacy.  If I take a shortcut and don't do my homework, shame on me.  

Her point was that guys shouldn't whine about having a bad time with a B&S.

I'm gonna stay and get my free piece... they all advertise "it's me or it's free", eh ?

I wouldn't have prefaced my point with "Actually not busting your balls..."

Since there does not seem a solution that serves either party.

It is the more insidious feeling a hooker gets when with a guy that is asking her to do something or who is hurting her with what he is doing. They find it hard to say no or stop for fear that he will punish them in a review...read what Mature GFE said in a post today about being hurt so bad she spent 3k getting better and I asked her why the hell did she not stop. No answer but I am guessing it was because she was afraid of a bad review.

-- Modified on 10/23/2014 2:19:08 PM

In fact, tricks are trapped by this review system, too.  I know you're aware the system is gamed by hookers, too. You're too smart not to. The manipulations and outright threats to get a top score.  The game-playing with Admin here to get a bad review pulled by telling them the date never took place.  I could go on.
You're usually more even-handed than this h+t.  I know you're well aware of the ways hookers distort the review system and your justifiable complaint  that "women are constantly at the mercy of the review system" is weakened when you only give half the story.
Face it: TER's review system is deeply, if not fatally flawed as it now stands but TER has too much invested in its massive review base and has no real motivation to change it.

Who can get what from who...in the trick case, more time/acts for less money, for the hookers more money for less work.  

...from a previous discussion where a provider (or two) said, stop rewarding bad behavior if guys wouldn't go ahead and see the deceiver she would stop so he should walk out. Every other time I've heard this it was a monger saying it. Do a search you'll fnd it often said.

And it goes beyond seeing who has reviewed her and cross-checking.  You've got to have a back-channel network of guys you trust who can steer you right.  I'm lucky to have some very good wing men and have almost never been steered wrong.

That is what Christophac is for. He is an advocate for tinyeye.  He would be an excellent resource for persuing those items of interest. He is a detective with a keen eye for those type of things.

Checkmate.  Again.

How in the world could it EVER be the client's fault for a provider who posts inaccurate photos?  I cannot even process the rationale of the client being anything but the victim in that scenario.  The provider is luring the client under false premises with pictures posted that are not a true and accurate representation.  It matters NOT what the client does or doesn't do once he realizes the bait and switch has occurred.  The client is still the victim PERIOD.  The provider who performed this egregious act is always at FAULT!

I'd have to say that it isn't at all manly to be putting pressure on the girl with review tthreats.  This is supposed to be enjoyable and make people happy, much like how you feel when you meet someone like me.  

Doesn't matter if the guys walk away or go for it anyway!