I read a similar view years ago......

and it makes sense.
As a devout atheist I always wondered, Why did "god" put the foreskin there and then make a covenant with his "chosen" people to cut it off? Did he make a mistake?
Why do so many in the modern world believe it should be cut of for sanitary purposes? Cleaning supplies are  cheap.
Maybe mine being gone, is why my nipples are so much more sensitive than my penis head!

Whew!!I am 42 and was going to have the snip done on me about a month ago.Im really glad I chickened out at the last minute.

It depends on the man and how much activity he's use to. Some men are overly sensitive when you pull back the foreskin.  Either the sensation makes them cum quicker or it is distracting and makes it harder to perform.

It's hard for me to judge how much a man loses being circumcised and most men never think or talk about it. I do have more conversation from the uncircumcised gentlemen who take a few minutes to give me directions on what works for him.

Kisses Haley

age...   I don't think he minded the loss of sensitivity but the proceedure was some freaking ordeal.   I don't think he'd been sexually active in some years & if it doesn't get stretched regularly, eventually you can't.  Bad scene anyway.  Better him than me.

Be happy in your own skin.
Whether you're cut or uncut, keep your junk clean.

OK, so there's less sexual pleasure. So what? On the other hand, the Center for Disease Control has found that "[m]ale circumcision reduces the risk that a man will acquire HIV from an infected female partner, and also lowers the risk of other STDs , penile cancer, and infant urinary tract infection. In female partners, it reduces the risk of cervical cancer, genital ulceration, bacterial vaginosis, trichomoniasis, and HPV. Although male circumcision has risks including pain, bleeding, and infection, more serious complications are rare." Feel better?