It seems to depend on Which "approver" does the approving.

Last provider I saw I had an awesome time with her. and when writing her review I gave her an 8, because she was simply all amazing over the phone, before the mainevent, during the mainevent, and after the session.

She didn't do anything wild but her performance, and deameanor was great, so this was my reason for giving her such a high score.

I got an e-mail from TER  which read:

"Thank you for submitting your review.
Unfortunately we are unable to post your review yet due to the performance rate.

In order to keep our performance ratings consistent, we set up the following system: An escort provider may only eligible to earn up to a 7, unless she also willing to performs the following during a session: Kisses With Tongue, Bare-Back Blow Job, Really Bi, Anal Sex, or More than One Guy. The addition of each offering will raise the score she is eligible for by one point.

This does not mean she earns extra points for performing the service; just that she is now eligible for a higher score. Her maximum eligible score is based on what is offered, not what is taken. You may or may not be interested in the “extra” services she has, but the fact she offers them makes her eligible for the higher score.

As she offers No "extra" services, she is eligible for a maximum Performance score of 7, but you gave her 8.

If you lower her Performance score, your review will be posted. Just click the "edit" button next to the review "

A year ago two providers I saw didn't do BBBJ's CIM, but i was allowed to give them 8's.  Seems to me TER is getting more strick on oh we rate providers

It might not have been enforced, but that is and was the rule.

-- Modified on 9/28/2011 8:12:02 PM

One lady I saw was held at a lower score until one of her reviewers mentioned getting anal with her. then from then after even though it was not changed on her profile page she got the higher scores allowed. As it says in the instructions she only has to be shown to offer it not that you got it and evidently that includes mentioning in the details.

I agree. Before the session started she layed her ground rules. where she didn't offer those services. However her session was still awesome.

Just because she didn't do or offer BBJ's does not mean her CBJ couldn't have been just as good. The young lady has her set rules, but within her rules, she throws it down nice and hard.

So, what you have to do is state somewhere in your review that the TER guidelines only allow a seven, but in your opinion she deserves an 8 (9 or 10), and let that be the way around the dilemma.

True, is doesn't help the gal in the ratings war, but it's the best we have.

Well right now the TERpage is showing over 4500 new reviews.  And I think that is 15 days?? Even if that is 30 that is a lot of review to go over.  They are bound to let things slip.  Also if you know for sure that a lady offers a service that is not marked you can send a problem report in and have it corrected.

Who is TER to decide for a gentleman what he decides is an 5 or 10?
GRRRR........ TER encourges men to lie... this explains alot.................

Posted By: magic4u

Last provider I saw I had an awesome time with her. and when writing her review I gave her an 8, because she was simply all amazing over the phone, before the mainevent, during the mainevent, and after the session.

She didn't do anything wild but her performance, and deameanor was great, so this was my reason for giving her such a high score.

I got an e-mail from TER  which read:

"Thank you for submitting your review.
Unfortunately we are unable to post your review yet due to the performance rate.

In order to keep our performance ratings consistent, we set up the following system: An escort provider may only eligible to earn up to a 7, unless she also willing to performs the following during a session: Kisses With Tongue, Bare-Back Blow Job, Really Bi, Anal Sex, or More than One Guy. The addition of each offering will raise the score she is eligible for by one point.

This does not mean she earns extra points for performing the service; just that she is now eligible for a higher score. Her maximum eligible score is based on what is offered, not what is taken. You may or may not be interested in the “extra” services she has, but the fact she offers them makes her eligible for the higher score.

As she offers No "extra" services, she is eligible for a maximum Performance score of 7, but you gave her 8.

If you lower her Performance score, your review will be posted. Just click the "edit" button next to the review "

A year ago two providers I saw didn't do BBBJ's CIM, but i was allowed to give them 8's.  Seems to me TER is getting more strick on oh we rate providers

It's just that users don't get to see it, lol.  Pretty much any transaction on the site can be tracked down to who did it, including things like how many moderated posts I approve.  While ClamSauce can't see the reviewers ID, I do think it's reasonable to assume that different reviewers would handle the process differently.  It's just human nature that different people will interpret the same rules differently.

my point was that is one of many factors that influence the variance in a subjective decision.  If CS cannot see the reviewers, than he has no data to support his "fact".  I just find it irritating in general when folks make illogical leaps.

Can bring another girl, especially if the guy does not take her up on the offer, then clearly her being into chicks had no bearing at all on her performance. If the apt was actually a double or the guy actually partook in anal it would make more sense, but girls who are not really bi or offer anal should not be penalized by not being eligible for a 10 performance because some guys do not want or need these services. I mean what bearing at all does a provider being "really bi" have on the my experience? Hey good for you more power to you.

Lol! According to what I hear, you ought to be asking about a TWENTY score!